Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

[Duritz]

Make sure to quiz him on whether or not he has to pilot the plane at a slight downward angle to attribute for the curvature of the earth. His answer will probably be gravity. Because you know... it's like the force in Star Wars. Magic. Also makes you wonder. If Gravity keeps us in atmosphere and able to fly in a straight line above and across a sphere... Then why isn't air travel faster in the direction of the earths rotation? Why isn't it slower the opposite direction? But alas, you'll find no such difference either way.

Because gravity, like wifi... Only works when you have the password.

"Bro, what's your wifi?"

I'm totally with you, except I don't think you're completely on top of it. Personally, I don't even think the plane leaves the ground. In fact, I don't think any plane has ever left the ground - I think it's all a hoax.

Think about it: we have to not only buckle up and often close our window, but we have to stow our tray tables UPRIGHT (why upright?) when we are taking off, PLUS (and here's the kicker) just when we are "taxi'ing" on the "runway" we are made - forced, even - to look at the boobs of an over-made up piece of mutton who we vaguely fantasise about doing in the toilets after takeoff, while she rabbits on about safety protocols. That's the great irony - all the while she's rabbiting on about safety, they are gassing us! So, they gas us with a "suggestability gas" in order that we are able to be convinced we've flown across the "globe" somewhere, when in fact we haven't even left the ground.

I'm with you comrade.

 

[Always Ballin]

Humorous.

- The Rational One

 

[CM86]

Gravity right! Such a joke.


Some how gravity can stop the ocean from moving... but I can beat it by jumping?
My legs are more powerful than the Pacific ocean? CMON!

I mean... I do work out... So maybe.

 

[Duritz]

Humorous.

- The Rational One

You don't think I am being serious?

 

[Always Ballin]

Gravity right! Such a joke.


Some how gravity can stop the ocean from moving... but I can beat it by jumping?
My legs are more powerful than the Pacific ocean? CMON!

I mean... I do work out... So maybe.

 

[Always Ballin]

You don't think I am being serious?

Irrelevant. I only care about the topic at hand, and the rationality of either the rotundity or pancake flatness of Earth.

 

[Duritz]

Irrelevant. I only care about the topic at hand, and the rationality of either the rotundity or pancake flatness of Earth.

I'm on your side here. I honestly believe, like you, that the round earthers are naive, ignorant, and perhaps even fanatically biased.

It's pretty clear that the pancake earth, walled by a massive ice wall which is guarded by the illuminati and whose existence is hidden by the powers that be in order to advance their nefarious ends is the only logical answer here.

I don't know how others live with themselves, blinded as they are by the MSM.

Friend can we meet sometime in a park to discuss these issues further? I do not trust cafe's, or libraries.

 

[CM86]

Look at all these pictures of people who haven't heard of gravity, so they just ignore it.


Cannot be explained!

Anyone spot the UFO in this pic?

 

[Always Ballin]

I'm on your side here. I honestly believe, like you, that the round earthers are naive, ignorant, and perhaps even fanatically biased.

It's pretty clear that the pancake earth, walled by a massive ice wall which is guarded by the illuminati and whose existence is hidden by the powers that be in order to advance their nefarious ends is the only logical answer here.

I don't know how others live with themselves, blinded as they are by the MSM.

Friend can we meet sometime in a park to discuss these issues further? I do not trust cafe's, or libraries.

I am on no side. Therefore, you are not on my side. But beneath me.

 

[Duritz]

I am on no side. Therefore, you are not on my side. But beneath me.

Friend, I agree with you. "Taking sides" is so establishment, it's so round earth. You and I are not like that friend. We traverse the space between fact and information, between reason and argument, and if the hirds and masses want to follow us then they need to open their minds to the reasoning of enlightenment.

What park can we meet in, friend?

 

[Always Ballin]

Friend, I agree with you. "Taking sides" is so establishment, it's so round earth. You and I are not like that friend. We traverse the space between fact and information, between reason and argument, and if the hirds and masses want to follow us then they need to open their minds to the reasoning of enlightenment.

What park can we meet in, friend?

I see the uncertainty in your words. A paradox of practice. You do not believe your own words. The sarcasm is detected. You wish not to pick sides, but alas this is exactly which that you have done. Your words humor me.

You can reach me via my Private Message Box. My schedule is quite jam packed so make sure to make a reservation.

"Squash with Tom and Jeanette 7PM tuesday... Drinks with Tammy and Paris 9PM thursday... Reservation at Dorcia on friday"

 

[CM86]

I see the uncertainty in your words. A paradox of practice. You do not believe your own words. The sarcasm is detected. You wish not to pick sides, but alas this is exactly which that you have done. Your words humor me.

You can reach me via my Private Message Box. My schedule is quite jam packed so make sure to make a reservation.

"Squash with Tom and Jeanette 7PM tuesday... Drinks with Tammy and Paris 9PM thursday... Reservation at Dorcia on friday"

I know why you play squash instead of tennis...
Because if the ball goes over that fence... you'll never get it back!

 

[Duritz]

I see the uncertainty in your words. A paradox of practice. You do not believe your own words. The sarcasm is detected. You wish not to pick sides, but alas this is exactly which that you have done. Your words humor* me.

You can reach me via my Private Message Box. My schedule is quite jam packed so make sure to make a reservation.

"Squash with Tom and Jeanette 7PM tuesday... Drinks with Tammy and Paris 9PM thursday... Reservation at Dorcia on friday"

*humour

So I see your background is American, friend? It is these minute detective skills which have made my name in my industry.

However my words display no paradox, sarcasm is merely a tool of the unimaginative mind. I first - and last - used sarcasm as a 2 year old, when I said to my mother "If I wanted breast milk I'd have asked to see the local cow - oh, wait..."

However back on point, I'll also be at Dorsia (I don't want to point it out, but you misspelled it in your post, how wonderfully ironic by you!) on Friday, I am there every Friday night in my regular window table, feel free to approach me if you wish, I shall dismiss my companion while you visit, though she does not speak English and I liberated her only weeks ago from the jungles of Borneo I am sure she is working for the CIA.

Yours,

Duritz.

 

[ash_1050]

The moon is round. The sun is round. Mars is round. The earth is flat. Genius.

 

[Always Ballin]

The moon is round. The sun is round. Mars is round. The earth is flat. Genius.

This is flawed logic. How do you know these things? How do you know the moon is a sphere? Why do you only see one face of the moon? I know where this goes. Tide... gravity! Wingardium Leviosa.

Now I neither believe Earth to be round or flat. Don't forget that I am the rational one here. I do not pick sides. I analyze evidence and give unbiased response.

From my research into the Flat Earth Theory, it is clear to me that you don't really know the ins and outs of it. I'll put it in easy terms. There is the ground, and there is above. The idea of space is above, because there is nothing but the ground beneath. On a globe model, space is in every which direction. There's this weird idea that the flat earth model has this same idea of 360 degree perspective space, as if Earth is just a flat dinner plate and off the edge and below, is the nothingness of space and the universe.

The truth is, the Earth is not so much as flat, as Earth is on a sole flat plane of existence. There is no edge that you would believe. There is just the coastline of "Antarctica", followed by snowy darkness for as far as the eye can see. The further away from the sun, the more frozen and lifeless the world gets. There is nothing beyond. It's noted in how different in comparison the arctic and antarctic regions are. Summers in the Arctic can actually get quite nice.

Anyways, that's a more accurate depiction of the theory. Just think of it as ground, and space above in the sky, not a flat earth in a 360 degree globular space in every which direction.

Anyways, I do not believe anything. I just provide unbiased response and debunk incorrect logic and "evidence" like yours.

Cliffs: You have no basis to make that claim, due to your presumption of the 3D rotundity of the moon, sun and different planets.

 

[CM86]

This is flawed logic. How do you know these things? How do you know the moon is a sphere? Why do you only see one face of the moon? I know where this goes. Tide... gravity! Wingardium Leviosa.

Now I neither believe Earth to be round or flat. Don't forget that I am the rational one here. I do not pick sides. I analyze evidence and give unbiased response.

From my research into the Flat Earth Theory, it is clear to me that you don't really know the ins and outs of it. I'll put it in easy terms. There is the ground, and there is above. The idea of space is above, because there is nothing but the ground beneath. On a globe model, space is in every which direction. There's this weird idea that the flat earth model has this same idea of 360 degree perspective space, as if Earth is just a flat dinner plate and off the edge and below, is the nothingness of space and the universe.

The truth is, the Earth is not so much as flat, as Earth is on a sole flat plane of existence. There is no edge that you would believe. There is just the coastline of "Antarctica", followed by snowy darkness for as far as the eye can see. The further away from the sun, the more frozen and lifeless the world gets. There is nothing beyond. It's noted in how different in comparison the arctic and antarctic regions are. Summers in the Arctic can actually get quite nice.

Anyways, that's a more accurate depiction of the theory. Just think of it as ground, and space above in the sky, not a flat earth in a 360 degree globular space in every which direction.

Anyways, I do not believe anything. I just provide unbiased response and debunk incorrect logic and "evidence" like yours.

Cliffs: You have no basis to make that claim, due to your presumption of the 3D rotundity of the moon, sun and different planets.

Fantastics, rational points.


Can you help me with my biased evidence?
What's the truth about the sun? Because they try to tell us it's so far away, but for some reason I can't see it in one position of the world I'm in, while others can see it in another position.

For example, I can see the sun at the moment, but it's not visible in London.

What cray cray is that?

 

[Lebbo73]

This is flawed logic. How do you know these things? How do you know the moon is a sphere? Why do you only see one face of the moon? I know where this goes. Tide... gravity! Wingardium Leviosa.

Now I neither believe Earth to be round or flat. Don't forget that I am the rational one here. I do not pick sides. I analyze evidence and give unbiased response.

From my research into the Flat Earth Theory, it is clear to me that you don't really know the ins and outs of it. I'll put it in easy terms. There is the ground, and there is above. The idea of space is above, because there is nothing but the ground beneath. On a globe model, space is in every which direction. There's this weird idea that the flat earth model has this same idea of 360 degree perspective space, as if Earth is just a flat dinner plate and off the edge and below, is the nothingness of space and the universe.

The truth is, the Earth is not so much as flat, as Earth is on a sole flat plane of existence. There is no edge that you would believe. There is just the coastline of "Antarctica", followed by snowy darkness for as far as the eye can see. The further away from the sun, the more frozen and lifeless the world gets. There is nothing beyond. It's noted in how different in comparison the arctic and antarctic regions are. Summers in the Arctic can actually get quite nice.

Anyways, that's a more accurate depiction of the theory. Just think of it as ground, and space above in the sky, not a flat earth in a 360 degree globular space in every which direction.

Anyways, I do not believe anything. I just provide unbiased response and debunk incorrect logic and "evidence" like yours.

Cliffs: You have no basis to make that claim, due to your presumption of the 3D rotundity of the moon, sun and different planets.

 

[Duritz]

This is flawed logic. How do you know these things? How do you know the moon is a sphere? Why do you only see one face of the moon? I know where this goes. Tide... gravity! Wingardium Leviosa.

Now I neither believe Earth to be round or flat. Don't forget that I am the rational one here. I do not pick sides. I analyze evidence and give unbiased response.

From my research into the Flat Earth Theory, it is clear to me that you don't really know the ins and outs of it. I'll put it in easy terms. There is the ground, and there is above. The idea of space is above, because there is nothing but the ground beneath. On a globe model, space is in every which direction. There's this weird idea that the flat earth model has this same idea of 360 degree perspective space, as if Earth is just a flat dinner plate and off the edge and below, is the nothingness of space and the universe.

The truth is, the Earth is not so much as flat, as Earth is on a sole flat plane of existence. There is no edge that you would believe. There is just the coastline of "Antarctica", followed by snowy darkness for as far as the eye can see. The further away from the sun, the more frozen and lifeless the world gets. There is nothing beyond. It's noted in how different in comparison the arctic and antarctic regions are. Summers in the Arctic can actually get quite nice.

Anyways, that's a more accurate depiction of the theory. Just think of it as ground, and space above in the sky, not a flat earth in a 360 degree globular space in every which direction.

Anyways, I do not believe anything. I just provide unbiased response and debunk incorrect logic and "evidence" like yours.

Cliffs: You have no basis to make that claim, due to your presumption of the 3D rotundity of the moon, sun and different planets.

Friend, you have not responded to my many PM's offering to meet. Have you got your PM's enabled? I can ask one of the mods to help if you wish. Be careful though most of them are my enemy, they believe in the spherical earth conspiracy.

I look forward to your response friend.

 

[M Malice]

i have just been convinced by the rigorously peer reviewed Big Footy science board otherwise known as the C,M & P board that the earth is flat. look forward to more scientific myth busting.
would like Always Ballin to work on the elvis conspiracy, i have this dream/hope that he is still alive and working at nandos.

 

[M Malice]

Lol.
AB you're one of the best trolls on bigfooty.

i think he has delusions of grandeur CM86, Always Ballin is nowhere near the GG.exe class yet as a fisher of men.

 

[ash_1050]

This is flawed logic. How do you know these things? How do you know the moon is a sphere? Why do you only see one face of the moon? I know where this goes. Tide... gravity! Wingardium Leviosa.

Now I neither believe Earth to be round or flat. Don't forget that I am the rational one here. I do not pick sides. I analyze evidence and give unbiased response.

From my research into the Flat Earth Theory, it is clear to me that you don't really know the ins and outs of it. I'll put it in easy terms. There is the ground, and there is above. The idea of space is above, because there is nothing but the ground beneath. On a globe model, space is in every which direction. There's this weird idea that the flat earth model has this same idea of 360 degree perspective space, as if Earth is just a flat dinner plate and off the edge and below, is the nothingness of space and the universe.

The truth is, the Earth is not so much as flat, as Earth is on a sole flat plane of existence. There is no edge that you would believe. There is just the coastline of "Antarctica", followed by snowy darkness for as far as the eye can see. The further away from the sun, the more frozen and lifeless the world gets. There is nothing beyond. It's noted in how different in comparison the arctic and antarctic regions are. Summers in the Arctic can actually get quite nice.

Anyways, that's a more accurate depiction of the theory. Just think of it as ground, and space above in the sky, not a flat earth in a 360 degree globular space in every which direction.

Anyways, I do not believe anything. I just provide unbiased response and debunk incorrect logic and "evidence" like yours.

Cliffs: You have no basis to make that claim, due to your presumption of the 3D rotundity of the moon, sun and different planets.

I'm seeing pretty clear evidence of several things in this post

 

[CM86]

i have just been convinced by the rigorously peer reviewed Big Footy science board otherwise known as the C,M & P board that the earth is flat. look forward to more scientific myth busting.
would like Always Ballin to work on the elvis conspiracy, i have this dream/hope that he is still alive and working at nandos.

Well, Elvis was a very talented, charismatic performer. He naturally drew people towards him.
Thus, gravity doesn't exist, it's actually Elvis, who is still alive, on the other side of the flat world.

 

[Always Ballin]

Sorry kids, was just busy in an all day board meeting. The successful man never stops working. The hunger is never satisfied!

Humor all round I see! Nothing like watching globeheads and flat earthers chimp off. Makes the rational one smile from above. It's cold up here! Brrrrrr!

I recently came across some stunning footage, sent to me from one of my hundreds of thousands of twitter fans.



Footage of a night weather balloon, displaying the function of the moon. Identical in visual size and movement. The same perspective visual as day weather balloon footage of the sun on it's path. It brings up other ideas that, the rational one questions.


- In this footage we have a sunrise/moonset high altitude weather balloon launch footage
- We see both the sun and moon rising and setting in their respective perspective on the horizons. We can see the lighting of the gradually closer sun, and dimming and faintness of the diminishing, leaving moon
- Visually, they are identical in movement and size (More on this later...)
- During the higher altitude moments, where the daylight has arrived as the sun draws nearer, we see a visible Hotspot underneath the direct locale of the orbiting sun
- This cannot be explained by a sun that is 149.6 million kilometers away. The only explanation is that the sun is a lot closer
- Also note; irrelevant of the altitude, the horizon remains flat. Eye level. This is important, because on a heliocentric ball earth model, as altitude increases, the horizon should begin to show a more and more pronounced curvature

Here is some quality footage of the visual perspective of a rising sun. The visual function so that you guys can understand how the horizon and perspective works.


Notice how visually the sun becomes larger as it gets closer? It dramatically increases in optical size in a very short amount of time. This is backed up by numerous high altitude weather balloon footage. This cannot be explained by a 149.6 million km away sun, as only a few thousand kilometers from the ground created quite a distinct optical size difference in the sun. You can do the math and notice that it does not add up on a dramatically far away sun.

Also one point I'd also like to remind you. The moon and the sun appear the same size. What is the mainstream reasoning for this?

"The sun and moon appear the same size in Earth's sky because the sun's diameter is about 400 times greater – but the sun is also about 400 times farther away. Bottom line: Thesun's diameter is about 400 times larger than that of the moon – and the sun is also about 400 times farther from Earth."

What a coincidence, right? It almost sounds like they're just making this up off observations. Presumptions of Earth rotundity? Sounds like it right. Anyways. The footage above including the visual movement of the sun, and the hotspot from the high altitude footage, all of which cannot be explained, suggest a much closer sun. And this is all applicable for the moon as well because of similar footage and identical optical size, only explained by sheer coincidental luck.

The rational one analyzes the evidence, and he concludes the sun to be much closer to the Earth, and the moon to be of the same size and distance away from Earth as the sun.

Thanks for your time kiddos. Wish I could stay and chat, but I have dinner with the mixed netball girls, and then a late night conference call at the office. さようなら!

(I can speak 6 different languages... Necessary for "global" business and commerce!)

- The Rational One

 

[FlowersByIrene]

Sorry kids, was just busy in an all day board meeting. The successful man never stops working. The hunger is never satisfied!

Humor all round I see! Nothing like watching globeheads and flat earthers chimp off. Makes the rational one smile from above. It's cold up here! Brrrrrr!

I recently came across some stunning footage, sent to me from one of my hundreds of thousands of twitter fans.



Footage of a night weather balloon, displaying the function of the moon. Identical in visual size and movement. The same perspective visual as day weather balloon footage of the sun on it's path. It brings up other ideas that, the rational one questions.


- In this footage we have a sunrise/moonset high altitude weather balloon launch footage
- We see both the sun and moon rising and setting in their respective perspective on the horizons. We can see the lighting of the gradually closer sun, and dimming and faintness of the diminishing, leaving moon
- Visually, they are identical in movement and size (More on this later...)
- During the higher altitude moments, where the daylight has arrived as the sun draws nearer, we see a visible Hotspot underneath the direct locale of the orbiting sun
- This cannot be explained by a sun that is 149.6 million kilometers away. The only explanation is that the sun is a lot closer
- Also note; irrelevant of the altitude, the horizon remains flat. Eye level. This is important, because on a heliocentric ball earth model, as altitude increases, the horizon should begin to show a more and more pronounced curvature

Here is some quality footage of the visual perspective of a rising sun. The visual function so that you guys can understand how the horizon and perspective works.


Notice how visually the sun becomes larger as it gets closer? It dramatically increases in optical size in a very short amount of time. This is backed up by numerous high altitude weather balloon footage. This cannot be explained by a 149.6 million km away sun, as only a few thousand kilometers from the ground created quite a distinct optical size difference in the sun. You can do the math and notice that it does not add up on a dramatically far away sun.

Also one point I'd also like to remind you. The moon and the sun appear the same size. What is the mainstream reasoning for this?

"The sun and moon appear the same size in Earth's sky because the sun's diameter is about 400 times greater – but the sun is also about 400 times farther away. Bottom line: Thesun's diameter is about 400 times larger than that of the moon – and the sun is also about 400 times farther from Earth."

What a coincidence, right? It almost sounds like they're just making this up off observations. Presumptions of Earth rotundity? Sounds like it right. Anyways. The footage above including the visual movement of the sun, and the hotspot from the high altitude footage, all of which cannot be explained, suggest a much closer sun. And this is all applicable for the moon as well because of similar footage and identical optical size, only explained by sheer coincidental luck.

The rational one analyzes the evidence, and he concludes the sun to be much closer to the Earth, and the moon to be of the same size and distance away from Earth as the sun.

Thanks for your time kiddos. Wish I could stay and chat, but I have dinner with the mixed netball girls, and then a late night conference call at the office. さようなら!

(I can speak 6 different languages... Necessary for "global" business and commerce!)

- The Rational One

All day board meeting... on a Sunday.


I think the Flat Earth is more believeable than that.

 

[Duritz]

Sorry kids, was just busy in an all day board meeting. The successful man never stops working. The hunger is never satisfied!

Humor all round I see! Nothing like watching globeheads and flat earthers chimp off. Makes the rational one smile from above. It's cold up here! Brrrrrr!

I recently came across some stunning footage, sent to me from one of my hundreds of thousands of twitter fans.



Footage of a night weather balloon, displaying the function of the moon. Identical in visual size and movement. The same perspective visual as day weather balloon footage of the sun on it's path. It brings up other ideas that, the rational one questions.


- In this footage we have a sunrise/moonset high altitude weather balloon launch footage
- We see both the sun and moon rising and setting in their respective perspective on the horizons. We can see the lighting of the gradually closer sun, and dimming and faintness of the diminishing, leaving moon
- Visually, they are identical in movement and size (More on this later...)
- During the higher altitude moments, where the daylight has arrived as the sun draws nearer, we see a visible Hotspot underneath the direct locale of the orbiting sun
- This cannot be explained by a sun that is 149.6 million kilometers away. The only explanation is that the sun is a lot closer
- Also note; irrelevant of the altitude, the horizon remains flat. Eye level. This is important, because on a heliocentric ball earth model, as altitude increases, the horizon should begin to show a more and more pronounced curvature

Here is some quality footage of the visual perspective of a rising sun. The visual function so that you guys can understand how the horizon and perspective works.


Notice how visually the sun becomes larger as it gets closer? It dramatically increases in optical size in a very short amount of time. This is backed up by numerous high altitude weather balloon footage. This cannot be explained by a 149.6 million km away sun, as only a few thousand kilometers from the ground created quite a distinct optical size difference in the sun. You can do the math and notice that it does not add up on a dramatically far away sun.

Also one point I'd also like to remind you. The moon and the sun appear the same size. What is the mainstream reasoning for this?

"The sun and moon appear the same size in Earth's sky because the sun's diameter is about 400 times greater – but the sun is also about 400 times farther away. Bottom line: Thesun's diameter is about 400 times larger than that of the moon – and the sun is also about 400 times farther from Earth."

What a coincidence, right? It almost sounds like they're just making this up off observations. Presumptions of Earth rotundity? Sounds like it right. Anyways. The footage above including the visual movement of the sun, and the hotspot from the high altitude footage, all of which cannot be explained, suggest a much closer sun. And this is all applicable for the moon as well because of similar footage and identical optical size, only explained by sheer coincidental luck.

The rational one analyzes the evidence, and he concludes the sun to be much closer to the Earth, and the moon to be of the same size and distance away from Earth as the sun.

Thanks for your time kiddos. Wish I could stay and chat, but I have dinner with the mixed netball girls, and then a late night conference call at the office. さようなら!

(I can speak 6 different languages... Necessary for "global" business and commerce!)

- The Rational One

You got it friend!