Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

[BIG BILLY F]

If somebody knows a pilot ask them if they have to constantly dip the plane to allow for the curvature of the earth....

 

[CM86]

If somebody knows a pilot ask them if they have to constantly dip the plane to allow for the curvature of the earth....

Why would they have to?

 

[BIG BILLY F]

Why would they have to?

It was a stupid joke really...my bad

On the premise that if the world was round pilots would fly off into space if they didn't correct the plane for the curve of the earth.

I dont believe in flat earth fwiw

 

[Thrawn]

Took my star destroyer for a spin around the Earth. Yup, definitely a globe.

 

[Duritz]

Such a falacy that "dip the plane" argument. One of the ways they keep it straight is by measuring distance to the ground, so they are constant adjusting to keep it about the same distance to the ground, thereby they are already naturally adjusting for the very gradual curve.

 

[Howard Littlejohn]

Such a falacy that "dip the plane" argument. One of the ways they keep it straight is by measuring distance to the ground, so they are constant adjusting to keep it about the same distance to the ground, thereby they are already naturally adjusting for the very gradual curve.

I would have thought it was simple garvity = lift. Ignoring minor changes in gravity, and slightly less minor changes in atmosphere, the same thrust against the same gravity keeps a plane at the same altitude without a need to adjust. The amount it falls and the amount of lift balance each other out.
This would hold true of a round or flat Earth, perhaps not a cubic Earth where the change is not so gradual on the edges.

 

[Duritz]

I would have thought it was simple garvity = lift. Ignoring minor changes in gravity, and slightly less minor changes in atmosphere, the same thrust against the same gravity keeps a plane at the same altitude without a need to adjust. The amount it falls and the amount of lift balance each other out.
This would hold true of a round or flat Earth, perhaps not a cubic Earth where the change is not so gradual on the edges.

The horizon is a key instrument in piloting. It's one of the ways you work out if you're upside down or not. The "adjust for the curve" argument displays an alarming ignorance about the nature of flying. It's a difficult thing. If you're in clouds or in rain or wind, you need to know at all times where the ground is: how far it is and where it is in relation to you. A pilot is not thinking "oops, better adjust for the minuscule and gradual earths curve", a pilot is thinking "where is the ground? Am I still level to it, not flying at it or away from it?"

It is very easy to become disoriented flying a plane. There's many documented examples of pilots not realising they are flying the craft upside down, for example. It's a difficult job and one that requires a lot of training and experience. To make the "better adjust for the curve" argument makes a person seem like a 12 year old whose only experience of piloting is on a video game.

 

[JD11]

The absurdity of this thread is the people who keep coming back to it; the while protesting the idiocy of it's premise; claiming to not be stupid enough to be sucked into the idea that earth is flat.

 

[Del80659]

Not flat.
View attachment 230691

do you still believe that's a photograph?

 

[frenchfri12]

this isn't a mystery, its bullshit.

 

[theyellowsash]

 

[Duritz]

Was just in a plane from Paris to Abu Dhabi. Got up very high, could see with my own two eyes the curve of the earth.

 

[Lebbo73]

Was just in a plane from Paris to Abu Dhabi. Got up very high, could see with my own two eyes the curve of the earth.

Pics or **** off!

 

[katana]

one of the facets of this conspiracy that is interesting is the apparent assumptions onto which modern science is heaped. according to wikipedia, henry cavendish was able to measure a torsion force of 1.74E-7 newtons due to the apparent gravitational attraction of the metal balls to one another. the article then says that this is equivalent to the weight of a "large grain of sand (13mg)". when you do the actual calculation, however, you get 0.000000174/9.81 = 1.8E-8 kg or 0.018mg which is 722 times less than the large grain of sand.

in short, was a man - named cavendish - able to calculate the weight of the sun, by hanging two balls from a roof? the experiment is simply one of the most ludicrous things i've ever heard.

 

[theyellowsash]

one of the facets of this conspiracy that is interesting is the apparent assumptions onto which modern science is heaped. according to wikipedia, henry cavendish was able to measure a torsion force of 1.74E-7 newtons due to the apparent gravitational attraction of the metal balls to one another. the article then says that this is equivalent to the weight of a "large grain of sand (13mg)". when you do the actual calculation, however, you get 0.000000174/9.81 = 1.8E-8 kg or 0.018mg which is 722 times less than the large grain of sand.

in short, was a man - named cavendish - able to calculate the weight of the sun, by hanging two balls from a roof? the experiment is simply one of the most ludicrous things i've ever heard.

well, youve got me convinced. im off to burn the library in the name of jesus!

 

[Duritz]

one of the facets of this conspiracy that is interesting is the apparent assumptions onto which modern science is heaped. according to wikipedia, henry cavendish was able to measure a torsion force of 1.74E-7 newtons due to the apparent gravitational attraction of the metal balls to one another. the article then says that this is equivalent to the weight of a "large grain of sand (13mg)". when you do the actual calculation, however, you get 0.000000174/9.81 = 1.8E-8 kg or 0.018mg which is 722 times less than the large grain of sand.

in short, was a man - named cavendish - able to calculate the weight of the sun, by hanging two balls from a roof? the experiment is simply one of the most ludicrous things i've ever heard.

Assumptions made by others and their experiments don't prove or disprove a rounded earth. Actually seeing the big ****er from up high and seeing its curve - that is proof.

And as I've said earlier ITT, even if you haven't been up high enough to see the earths curve, you can see the rounded shape of the moon. You don't even need a telescope but through a telescope it is obvious. I was watching the footy the other night and the cameras had a great close up of the moon, it was beautiful, of course, and it was rounded.

So, the moon is demonstrably round. The sun is round. The other planets are round. The earth is flat though lol...

 

[theyellowsash]

Assumptions made by others and their experiments don't prove or disprove a rounded earth. Actually seeing the big goose from up high and seeing its curve - that is proof.

And as I've said earlier ITT, even if you haven't been up high enough to see the earths curve, you can see the rounded shape of the moon. You don't even need a telescope but through a telescope it is obvious. I was watching the footy the other night and the cameras had a great close up of the moon, it was beautiful, of course, and it was rounded.

So, the moon is demonstrably round. The sun is round. The other planets are round. The earth is flat though lol...

no theyre all a flat circle like a coin but the greens use their bogus science to make sure theyre always facing towards us so that they look like a sphere. the proof is that a crescent moon is actually when they are having technical problems.

 

[katana]

my god. i'm not here - for the 70th time - to have arguments about the shape of the earth. this thread is about a community of roughly 10,000 people on youtube who've, in the last year and a half, created something of a 'scene' of cosmological research.

you morons don't seem to be able to get it through your heads that i don't think the world is flat but simply enjoy looking into a fringe line of research.

 

[katana]

Assumptions made by others and their experiments don't prove or disprove a rounded earth. Actually seeing the big goose from up high and seeing its curve - that is proof.

And as I've said earlier ITT, even if you haven't been up high enough to see the earths curve, you can see the rounded shape of the moon. You don't even need a telescope but through a telescope it is obvious. I was watching the footy the other night and the cameras had a great close up of the moon, it was beautiful, of course, and it was rounded.

So, the moon is demonstrably round. The sun is round. The other planets are round. The earth is flat though lol...

don't you have children?

 

[Duritz]

don't you have children?

Yeah I do. Some with my wife and some more with your mum, why?

 

[Thrawn]

my god. i'm not here - for the 70th time - to have arguments about the shape of the earth. this thread is about a community of roughly 10,000 people on youtube who've, in the last year and a half, created something of a 'scene' of cosmological research.

you morons don't seem to be able to get it through your heads that i don't think the world is flat but simply enjoy looking into a fringe line of research.

i've become pretty enamoured with yoga instructor, flat-earther and all-round interesting guy eric dubay.

You're enamoured with either a moron or someone who cashes in on people's stupidity. And you wonder why people are belittling you?

 

[Present Not Past]

one of the facets of this conspiracy that is interesting is the apparent assumptions onto which modern science is heaped. according to wikipedia, henry cavendish was able to measure a torsion force of 1.74E-7 newtons due to the apparent gravitational attraction of the metal balls to one another. the article then says that this is equivalent to the weight of a "large grain of sand (13mg)". when you do the actual calculation, however, you get 0.000000174/9.81 = 1.8E-8 kg or 0.018mg which is 722 times less than the large grain of sand.

in short, was a man - named cavendish - able to calculate the weight of the sun, by hanging two balls from a roof? the experiment is simply one of the most ludicrous things i've ever heard.

Assumptions? Really? There's a saying: "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing".

 

[Wiggo4PM]

Disclaimer (get comfy its a long one) - this is a crazy post but all information is public domain. Its more of a bigger picture theory/answer/help. You have been warned.

(this isnt a discussion about if the bible and other religious books are real or not just take the content that I am talking about for this ramble) fwiw they are just books to me, encoded (not the bible code) with blinds to hide other information....psalms hide a lot.

I am not a religious person at all by any means, but the bible (haven't checked other religious books that much as I cant be bothered nor have the time these days to do so and if they also state it in these terms re the Earth) it never mentions that we live on a sphere - it does call it a face, plane, and a surface and refers to the ends of the world many times with zero references to a "sphere" (Also not End of the World as in destruction) and "Satan" took "Jesus" to the top of the highest mountain and showed him ALL of the kingdoms at once that he could rule over (math tells us that this should not be possible on a spherical earth and I understand analogies and allegory just fine but bare with me) Even talks about the far ends of the earth being devoid of all life and light - now that to me is a clue (if you believe the earth is flat) as to why you cant get to the edges....and chances are if you did manage to survive (though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me) and found a wall and went up and noticed it was a dome - then you would have to believe that divine creation or what people call God did in fact create it and have actually have some tangible proof - therefore the conspiracy of HIDING "god" is all that more plausible in a biblical sense as well as practical sense here on earth (ive kinda alluded to it in the apollo 13 thread regarding the saturn influence on earth and Steve Icke theory see video below its off topic but is one reason for the hiding/deflection) Whilst yes he is crazy like myself, he does make some sense about some things.

We all know or joke that the Illuminati rule the world these days etc...but you know the story.. 500 odd years ago everyone thought the world was flat until Galileo Galilei said otherwise with his proof - and he was an Illuminati member (when it was apparently cool to be in if you were a man of science at the time and thats cool and I get it - no problems) But absolute power corrupts.

One thing that does make a lot of sense at least to me and my occult studies etc is the vedic take on it all. See video below (yes its the longest one)

Personally...I think the planet is a sphere - but its sooooo massive we dont really know (yes this does take into account we never landed on the moon or been up high enough to take a pciture..youd think with the "1000's" of "satellites" in the sky you would point a camera at the Earth and I could watch the Earth "spin at 1000mphs" 24 hours a day on a channel - see video below about van allens belts below and the theory of the Expanding Earth - yes its a theory too...) however....the part we know as Earth is just on one section of it...hence its pretty flat. Not going to bother about the "spinning earth" and the pole star google it as it all ties in.

For example (its 2d so you can see what I am saying about a flat surface on a sphere)

Not a good picture of what I described but...

flat surfaces on a sphere - thats a 400 sided dice

You get the idea now.

There is a flat surface on a sphere (lots of them) Inter dimension travel, middle earth theories, caves to other words etc, tv shows such as: sliders, stargate etc to me is discovering new lands on the Sphere that Earth is a part of. Remember Admiral Byrd who went to Antarctica more times than anyone, did state that there was land larger than the US and EU beyond Antarctica..was he talking about the place itself?..not so in his address live on national tv before Operation High Jump. You can look into the Nazis in your own time about what and why (speculating of course) why they went there and for what. Some say Atlantis...which might be true but what if it was a country/city beyond the ice ? Shangri La is apparently a city hidden within the Earth only accessible by certain cave passages..same idea. Operation Fishbowl was all about nuclear testing........in space.....

I would talk about the flight plans etc but its not really proof in my opinion - sure there are sus things...specially when its been said whilst the GPS was a US military design and works perfectly in the Northern hemisphere for every journey for ALL of the journey, and has its issues in the Southern Hemisphere - makes you wonder why they haven't found MH370 yet...

End of the day, I am not sure and ive flown etc, do I buy into the fish eye lens crap and nasa? not really, imo when i see that footage and people are pointing out LOOK ITS CURVED SEE ITS IN DA VIDEO, or I look out a double glass pane plane window...whilst I agree with that on point - im looking at it through a filter/lens and not directly with my own 2 eyes. But believe this - even if you dont believe in biblical and occult stuff etc - there are people with the most power in the world that DO and WILL use it to their advantage. Once you start digging, you can find soo many opinions and soo many facts either way and then upside down and inside out ones. Misdirection at its finest.

Now some videos and pictures if you can be bothered. None of this is to brainwash you into saying your wrong or right. If its flat or if its spherical...Its just information thats old and written off and most if not all world religions believe it at its core (regarding the vedic video)

How the bible describes the creation of Earth (see pic immediately below) - /off topic an anagram of that is Heart, heart is also the green coloured chakra - so this GO GREEN isnt about the environment really /ontopic

I know I left off talking about other things like the Sun and the Moon. Some say they are in the dome with us, and its the same size and distance from the earth as the moon (they try to explain sundogs with light reflecting off the dome - even planet x or nibiru is written off as a reflection of the sun against the dome - sun spots) etc. Again and I agree with people stating that 1000's of people need to be in on it.. but we are talking about it, there is a lot of info(or dis info) out there about it..who knows....nasa ? please

Magellan circumnavigates the world...

or

Im still yet to see anyone go North to South, or South to North yet...has anyone found anything ? ive looked or not looked hard enough but..i cant.... or have information as to why it hasn't ? I mean it would be almost believable then what nasa said about not going to the moon anymore...

Now some videos.



Whilst this is a hindu take on it, the general principals on this ie the setup,structure and layout is what most ancients believed as well as highest serving positions in world religions. You could learn Enochian and their rituals etc and find out for yourself - but then you would be called a crazy person right


No dome ? Then what did this rocket hit with sound and make it stop climbing and spinning on the spot?


Could have just exploded - but its still sold when trying to "push forward"

Warning crazy to the max incoming // And lets not forget about the footage of astronauts "under water" passed off as authentic space footage. Google them yourself..Look at the picture about of the Bible model of Earth....if they did breach the dome then Yes they would definitely be in water. I dont believe that, because again, Cern and the Hadron Collider is apparently looking for the god particle or anti matter ...why ? well we can speculate all night, but if it was say 'The powers that be' idea to hide the real shape of the earth to hide god as I alluded to above as MY reasoning why IF IT WERE TRUE the earth was flat...they then definitely want a way to pierce their firmament and get up to the "heavens" so to speak. Apparently we were there before the fall of man and kicked out of the Garden of Eden....tower of babel all ties into trying to reach back to god..what if they worked out there is a dome ... and now trying to work out how to crack it open..nukes clearly failed. (again it speculation on my behalf with what I just said but the goals of the power elite in the know are more crazier than whatever I can surmise) // end of uber crazy

Interesting topics re flat earth - Kármán line, Ezekiels Wheel/s

Now you see why its impossible (in my mind) to have a debate about if the world is flat or not and expect a simple yes or no answer or even a solid paragraph or two with the truth...and how many of them interconnect. And admittedly I haven't touched on the basic topics about this theory but you can research that yourselves, it kinda involves a lot and easier to call someone crazy, no one likes being told they have been lied too all their life - I dont, hence why I dig at interesting topics (pro and con) Wont touch on all the CGI videos and pictures from nasa....I do believe the sun and moon are spherical - that is not concrete evidence that what we are standing on is a sphere as well - to most it is and that is fine.

But then again I blame the Jesuits...for everything

/crazy out


have fun more videos in next post as I cant put more than 5 in.

 

[Wiggo4PM]

Simpsons have a history of letting the cat out of the bag (that's if you believe other conspiracy theories)


Watch from 3 mins - and the kicker where he admits at least to my understanding they haven't gone through the Van Allens belts at 3:35 - 3:40


Byrd talks about this land here - this was before Operation HighJump


Icke video from first paragraph.

 

[Shane Hird]