Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

[evo]

More examples of the panic strickened ball lovers attempting to intimidate flat earthers as our numbers continue to swell.
flat.html

 

[evo]

Like we say at the FES...Balls are for playing with,not living on.

Hahaha. More gold!

 

[Nothing]

Where does doughnut shaped impenetrable barriers fit in?

Two donuts of seething radiation that surround Earth, called the Van Allen radiation belts, have been found to contain a nearly impenetrable barrier that prevents the fastest, most energetic electrons from reaching Earth.

It is NOT impenetrable. Nowhere does it say that. I was nearly World Surfing Champion doesn't mean I was World Surfing Champion.
Further, specifically they are claiming it is NEARLY impenetrable to the a subset of electrons.

 

[Duritz]

And your being pedantic in your attempts to put road blocks up in front of FE discussion.
The tides turning with our numbers swelling and our cause being spread on Big Brother,road signs,education of the next generation etc.

And Starbucks.

 

[Zidane98]

Stuff flat earth. I reckon the earth is actually a square box. Prove me wrong.

 

[Duritz]

Stuff flat earth. I reckon the earth is actually a square box. Prove me wrong.

Why would we at the FES ridicule your theory without solid evidence? That would be very unscientific.

 

[JackOutback]

Stuff flat earth. I reckon the earth is actually a square box. Prove me wrong.

Block universe theory does provide a fascinating insight into time.

 

[NEGAN]

It is NOT impenetrable. Nowhere does it say that. I was nearly World Surfing Champion doesn't mean I was World Surfing Champion.
Further, specifically they are claiming it is NEARLY impenetrable to the a subset of electrons.

NASA words not mine, they used it.

Look at this guy he is getting angry defending his man made doughnut barrier.....lol

 

[darthbards]

Stuff flat earth. I reckon the earth is actually a square box. Prove me wrong.

Block universe theory does provide a fascinating insight into time.

Lol,more derailing tactics as the ball lovers this time attempt to pretend to be blockheads.

 

[Nothing]

NASA words not mine, they used it.

Look at this guy he is getting angry defending his man made doughnut barrier.....lol

Man made?

 

[NEGAN]

Man made?

Yes,

2014 spot a barrier say impenetrable

https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/van-allen-probes-spot-impenetrable-barrier-in-space

Then 2017 spot a barrier say man made

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddar...-probes-spot-man-made-barrier-shrouding-earth

 

[Boston tiger]

Yes,

2014 spot a barrier say impenetrable

https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/van-allen-probes-spot-impenetrable-barrier-in-space

Then 2017 spot a barrier say man made

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddar...-probes-spot-man-made-barrier-shrouding-earth

Yes but if you read both articles

 

[NEGAN]

Yes but if you read both articles

Oh I did,

But you're missing my point.

My point is if flat earthers say there is a barrier you guys will question it to the tenth degree.

But if NASA makes claims of impenetrable or man man made barriers it's ho hum.

(Remember these guys lost all records of "mans greatest achievement" even today.)


The difference ?

If you said unlimited funds and unlimited resources and a monopoly on the information you would be correct.

 

[Quivorir]

silly quotes

The second time you have quoted that. I am not mocking it, I am repeating what I was told. There is a very distinct difference.

 

[Boston tiger]

Oh I did,

But you're missing my point.

My point is if flat earthers say there is a barrier you guys will question it to the tenth degree.

But if NASA makes claims of impenetrable or man man made barriers it's ho hum.

(Remember these guys lost all records of "mans greatest achievement" even today.)


The difference ?

If you said unlimited funds and unlimited resources and a monopoly on the information you would be correct.

The difference is in the detail.

 

[NEGAN]

The difference is in the detail.

It has to be a relative level playing field first.

Best part of a decade and limited budget going against a bias

vs

500 years of this is how it is and 60 years of unlimited budget and resources and a monopoly on the information.


There are smarter people than you and I working on the flat earth Hypothesis you may or may not get your details in time.

 

[darthbards]

There are smarter people than you and I working on the flat earth Hypothesis you may or may not get your details in time.

Thanks for that kind words NEGAN. I'll pass them on to my colleagues at the FES also.

 

[NEGAN]

Thanks for that kind words NEGAN. I'll pass them on to my colleagues at the FES also.

Still waiting for the monopoly to answer what is gravity.

 

[Boston tiger]

It has to be a relative level playing field first.

Best part of a decade and limited budget going against a bias

vs

500 years of this is how it is and 60 years of unlimited budget and resources and a monopoly on the information.


There are smarter people than you and I working on the flat earth Hypothesis you may or may not get your details in time.

Except you can travel around the earth for under 10,000 dollars .

 

[darthbards]

Still waiting for the monopoly to answer what is gravity.

Lol...I've given up waiting.
212 pages of deflections and cheap shots mingled in with hysterical defences of NASA.

With these donuts. My guess is NASA and the religious monopoly of fraudulent and institutionalised science are preparing for a future announcement they have drawn an artists impression of some planet millions of light years away,in a Goldilocks zone,surrounded by donuts similar to the donuts that now apparently surround earth.
Wait for the ball lovers to then wet their pants in excitement as they talk of the possibility of some kind of Alien life form on this goldilocks zoned drawing.

 

[Nothing]

Yes,

2014 spot a barrier say impenetrable

https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/van-allen-probes-spot-impenetrable-barrier-in-space

Then 2017 spot a barrier say man made

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddar...-probes-spot-man-made-barrier-shrouding-earth

You quote the same article that says nearly impenetrable barrier to a subset of electrons. That is different to an impenetrable barrier.
As for the second one, once again you fail to understand nuance.
“A number of experiments and observations have figured out that, under the right conditions, radio communications signals in the VLF frequency range can in fact affect the properties of the high-energy radiation environment around the Earth,” said Phil Erickson, assistant director at the MIT Haystack Observatory, Westford, Massachusetts.

Still waiting for the monopoly to answer what is gravity.

Gravity is a 2013 film starring Sandra Bullock
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1454468/

 

[darthbards]

Ball lovers...would you prefer it if the FES said you needn't concern yourselves about falling off the edge of the earth if we started calling the Ice Wall an Ice Donut?

 

[darthbards]

Gravity is a 2013 film starring Sandra Bullock
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1454468/

Magik Gravity,always met with deflections disguised as baby humour from the believers in the beliefs of the religious monopoly of fraudulent and institutionalised science.

 

[darthbards]

A couple more examples of the frauds at NASA attempting to increase the use of the word 'donut' amongst the vocabulary of followers of the religious monopoly of fraudulent and institutionalised science.
Note how they are using a food source loved by children to fit in with other scientific terms such as goldilocks.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/623533/Bizarre-donut-UFOs-stalking-ISS-has-mystery-been-solved

https://www.space.com/24718-mars-jelly-doughnut-rock-mystery-solved.html

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/new-horizons-map-of-pluto-the-whale-and-the-donut

 

[NEGAN]

Except you can travel around the earth for under 10,000 dollars .

Well **** me,

Countless internet threads youtubes debated arguments documentations in the past decade page 212 on Bigfooty ....ON BIGFOOTY.


why hasn't anyone thought about this argument before?