Conspiracy Theory The nefarious activities of Jeffrey Epstein

[bourbons]

Don't be juvenile. I'm not defending rape in any shape or form.

You're defending/deflecting for Donnie in every shape and form, including on his sexual impropriety.

Years ago a close family friend of mine was r*ped and I had the opportunity of beating her rapist to a pulp and took that opportunity with relish so don't tell me I defend rape.

You wouldn't have done that if Donald Trump had r*ped your friend though (and you somehow had the same opportunity to tune him up).

That's the point.

 

[bourbons]

I know your question is a rhetorical joke but yes he is/has been literally persecuted.

lol

You say the same regarding legals against him like the classified docs. The most obvious and straightforward crime per the law you're ever likely to see, bloke is literally on tape confirming he knew the stuff he was showing some random was classified, and that he could have de-classified when he was prez but can't now.

You're simply not equipped to make a rational assessment on anything Trump related.

 

[faible]

You're defending/deflecting for Donnie in every shape and forum, including on his sexual impropriety.


You wouldn't have done that if Donald Trump had r*ped your friend though (and you somehow had the same opportunity to tune him up).

That's the point.

'I can't be a rape defender because I once beat up a guy my friend said r*ped her'.

Now, notwithstanding it could all just be LARPing on the internet to try to pretend he's not a shitty dude supporting a sex offender.

It's like arguing you can't be racist because you have a black friend. It doesn't work that way.

The mental gymnastics to justify why Trump didn't 'rape' her, based on an extremely narrow legal definition, despite it being found he did sexually assault her, and that exact behaviour would be classified as rape based on basically any other definition anywhere except the very narrow legal term used in NYC (which the judge even noted) whilst arguing endlessly in support of Trump and why Carroll shouldn't be believed, simply makes him a support of a guy who sexually assaulted a woman. Who r*ped a woman. He supports Trump even knowing he's a sex offender, because he likes the hateful things Trump says, and he's simply a shitty dude.

 

[Mofra]

 

[BFew]

@Mrs Putin

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

You wouldn't have done that if Donald Trump had r*ped your friend though (and you somehow had the same opportunity to tune him up).

It wouldn't matter who had r*ped her. Given the same opportunity, they would have received the same treatment.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

True enough - its more the reflexive psychological need to deflect or run defense for dear leader in literally any situation that is more indicative in your case.

This statement is as untrue as the countless others you've levelled against me including the one where you said I'd never criticised Trump. You're so full of shit you really need another arseh*le.

You paint everyone on the right side of politics as disingenuous, deceitful and incapable of critical thought when on the first two counts you are worse than almost everyone you disparage and on the last while intelligent and clearly capable of critical thought, you only display it if it suits your purposes and rarely if ever to acknowledge any deficiencies in your own arguments.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

'I can't be a rape defender because I once beat up a guy my friend said r*ped her'.

Now, notwithstanding it could all just be LARPing on the internet to try to pretend he's not a shitty dude supporting a sex offender.

It's like arguing you can't be racist because you have a black friend. It doesn't work that way.

The mental gymnastics to justify why Trump didn't 'rape' her, based on an extremely narrow legal definition, despite it being found he did sexually assault her, and that exact behaviour would be classified as rape based on basically any other definition anywhere except the very narrow legal term used in NYC (which the judge even noted) whilst arguing endlessly in support of Trump and why Carroll shouldn't be believed, simply makes him a support of a guy who sexually assaulted a woman. Who r*ped a woman. He supports Trump even knowing he's a sex offender, because he likes the hateful things Trump says, and he's simply a shitty dude.

Wow. It's like you never read #1,767 at all. Rather than respond to the multiple points I made in that post, you chose to quote bourbons instead and cover ground I've already addressed. Sneaky tactic. Then in #1,775 you removed everything I said apart from the last 7 words and just replied to that. Pathetic.

Just as an aside you do realise there's plenty of places around the world that also require penile penetration to occur for it to be considered rape. For example (without being exhaustive) Scotland, New Zealand and much of Australia until relatively recently, with Tasmania being the last hold out.

 

[faible]

Wow. It's like you never read #1,767 at all. Rather than respond to the multiple points I made in that post, you chose to quote bourbons instead and cover ground I've already addressed. Sneaky tactic. Then in #1,775 you removed everything I said apart from the last 7 words and just replied to that. Pathetic.

Just as an aside you do realise there's plenty of places around the world that also require penile penetration to occur for it to be considered rape. For example (without being exhaustive) Scotland, New Zealand and much of Australia until relatively recently, with Tasmania being the last hold out.

We see you for who you are, not a truth teller or a free thinker, just a defender of rapists and sex offenders so long as they say things you like.

 

[sintoo]

'I can't be a rape defender because I once beat up a guy my friend said r*ped her'.

Now, notwithstanding it could all just be LARPing on the internet to try to pretend he's not a shitty dude supporting a sex offender.

It's like arguing you can't be racist because you have a black friend. It doesn't work that way.

The mental gymnastics to justify why Trump didn't 'rape' her, based on an extremely narrow legal definition, despite it being found he did sexually assault her, and that exact behaviour would be classified as rape based on basically any other definition anywhere except the very narrow legal term used in NYC (which the judge even noted) whilst arguing endlessly in support of Trump and why Carroll shouldn't be believed, simply makes him a support of a guy who sexually assaulted a woman. Who r*ped a woman. He supports Trump even knowing he's a sex offender, because he likes the hateful things Trump says, and he's simply a shitty dude.

I have a cool story for you dude

There was this pool boy in a Florida area hotel. This milf visitor thought he was hot. The milf seduces him. The milf's husband sits in the room watching the pool boy smash her. The milf enjoyed the smashing so much she took the smashing pool boys number. Milf and he keep in contact. Milf and hubby catch up with pool boy regular, milf and pool boy smash while hubby sits in the corner playing with himself. He even goes and visits them in the state they live. Things for so well they decide to buy pool boy his own hotel. Pool boy knows a couple of real estate doods who find him a backpackers. Milf and hubby want 50 percent of profits. Pool boy comes quite successful with hostel. The guys who found it for him decide to blackmail pool boy milf and hubby. Milf and hubby run the biggest Christian collage in America. Hubby's dad started it. Hubby goes to a lawyer saying fix this. Hostel is queer friendly and advertises it.
Lawyer fixes it. Lawyer then tells hubby you have to endorse Donald Trump for president to your flock ( this is 2015) hubby endorses Donald Trump. Some reckon this got him over the line. He wasn't really liked by them before this, wouldn't of endorsed him.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

faible

Who's "we"? bourbons, RCAB, LuvtheKangas et al I presume. That's OK. It's not like you guys have a great track record for viewing things from a balanced perspective very often. For instance you probably saw Kyle Rittenhouse as an indiscriminate mass murderer 5 years ago.

 

[faible]

faible

Who's "we"? bourbons, RCAB, LuvtheKangas et al I presume. That's OK. It's not like you guys have a great track record for viewing things from a balanced perspective very often. For instance you probably saw Kyle Rittenhouse as an indiscriminate mass murderer 5 years ago.

View attachment 2408749

'We' being basically anyone except the half dozen pro-Trumpers that will support him irrespective of what he does.

Because you're not a truth teller or a free thinker, just a defender of rapists and sex offenders so long as they say things you like.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

'We' being basically anyone except the half dozen pro-Trumpers that will support him irrespective of what he does.

No one on this thread does that.

Because you're not a truth teller or a free thinker, just a defender of rapists ...

More lies.

Ironically you probably defended one of the guys Rittenhouse shot 5 years ago (Rosenbaum) all in an effort to try and portray Rittenhouse as a murderer when he acted in self defense.

 

[faible]

Ironically you probably defended one of the guys Rittenhouse shot 5 years ago (Rosenbaum) all in an effort to try and portray Rittenhouse as a murderer when he acted in self defense.

'Look, over there!'

We see you for who you are, not a truth teller or a free thinker, just a defender of rapists and sex offenders so long as they say things you like.

 

[bourbons]

It wouldn't matter who had r*ped her. Given the same opportunity, they would have received the same treatment.

You either wouldn't have believed her, or would have told her how lucky she was.

 

[bourbons]

This statement is as untrue as the countless others you've levelled against me including the one where you said I'd never criticised Trump. You're so full of shit you really need another arseh*le.

Yeah yeah mate, we know - you're a paragon of rationality and balanced critique. dO yOu kNoW wATeR iSN't aCTuAlLy WeT!???

Spare us.

 

[bourbons]

It's not like you guys have a great track record for viewing things from a balanced perspective very often.

OK dude, what the ****. You get into the red cordial or something?

Rare form today, combined with a Stokey-like level of self awareness

 

[bourbons]

No one on this thread does that.

I mean... you can keep telling us the water isn't wet all you like.

Just don't expect anyone outside of your fellow cultists to buy it ¯\(ツ)/¯

 

[Cyg1992]

It wouldn't matter who had r*ped her. Given the same opportunity, they would have received the same treatment.

If trump had been the rapist in your totally not made up story, you'd have dropped your dacks, bent over and self applied the lube quicker than you can say Rolf Harris.

And even then your daddy would ignore you because you'd have been too old for him even 50 years ago.

 

[Cyg1992]

@Mrs Putin

That according to him, the Epstein files and client list are a hoax that only weak and stupid people believe in, must've really been a kick in the nuts for the cookers.

Something they've based a solid decade of their sole being on, despite being grown adults well into their 60s, is all just BS apparently

 

[bourbons]

That according to him, the Epstein files and client list are a hoax that only weak and stupid people believe in, must've really been a kick in the nuts for the cookers.

Something they've based a solid decade of their sole being on, despite being grown adults well into their 60s, is all just BS apparently

Yep. It would be a lot to deal with, cognitive dissonance bordering on physical pain I'd say.

Has definitely cracked a few of them wide open, zill and HitTheNailOnTheHead the most pertinent examples on this board.

 

[zill]

Yep. It would be a lot to deal with, cognitive dissonance bordering on physical pain I'd say.

Has definitely cracked a few of them wide open, zill and HitTheNailOnTheHead the most pertinent examples on this board.

It should be noted you are all in on conspiracy theories when trumps name is attached.

 

[bourbons]

It should be noted you are all in on conspiracy theories when trumps name is attached.

Cheers for immediately confirming my take regarding your current level of broken

Look, let me sort you out here mate, its easy - simply stop basing your political worldview if not entire sense of self on a politician in another country who wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire

 

[sintoo]

It should be noted you are all in on conspiracy theories when trumps name is attached

A few years ago lunatic left commentators like tom tunaki were calling anyone who spoke up about the Epstein client list and flight logs for his personal jet " pedophile fantasists"

How things have changed, now the lunatic left is attacking the Zionist right about Donald Trumps cover up of what they initially covered up.

So does that make the left " pedophile fantasists " now as well?

 

[bourbons]

A few years ago lunatic left commentators like tom tunaki were calling anyone who spoke up about the Epstein client list and flight logs for his personal jet " pedophile fantasists"

Citation needed.

I did find this video of Tom's from 3 years ago titled 'Paedo fantasists'



but you can't be talking about that coz, surprise surprise, Epstein wasn't mentioned once ¯\(ツ)/¯

There was a bit about Qanon and cookers' general penchant for labeling people they don't like pedos, though. You wouldn't be going down the zill road of intentionally conflating nonsense like Q and Pizzagate with verified, evidence-backed cases of pedophilia, tested in courts, that people went to jail for would you?

Coz thats not a great road. Zill's doing it to avoid any acknowledgement of the fact the foreign demagogue he's outsourced his brain to is actually a really shit bloke and very likely a pedo, but you come across as a little more rational.