jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
He's the keeper of the code, not the architect. His job is to keep the code relevant in an increasingly (pharmaceutically) changing environment. It is why they have constant reviews of the Code and substances that should be included in it. He has just overseen one such change to the code. I believe this makes him more likely to identify weaknesses and have them addressed. THAT is his job, more than anything else.he's the keeper of the code. He's not going to say anything else Jen. Not only that, but hypothetically if the AFL were to try to renegotiate then what he's stated there would be his starting point. Why would he give that up publicly for no reason? That's not how the world works