The off topic thread 3.0

[WealstoneRaider]

They claimed it was because she posted someone's personal phone number white violates the twitter terms of service. But people can throw racist abuse, threaten violence and the president can literally threaten another country with nuclear war without any issues.

You forgot to mention all the Islamic jihadist stuff you can find on the net through a simple google search. But of course that wouldn’t sit with your agenda

 

[SM]

So you see no hypocrisy from the many Hollywood stars who all came out and bashed Trump as some kind of lecherous, unstable man yet at the same time most would have at the least known about Weinstein’s antics? This is no doubt the tip of the iceberg - I expect there are many more HW’s out there. The place is corrupt, sleaze ridden filth. Everyone kind of knew that, but now the proof is out

Sorry, what exactly are you accusing me of defending?

 

[Quivorir]

You’re a funny man sometimes. I actually think you might suffer delusion. To even attempt to defend this is absurd

Can you post exactly what it is you read that SM said, because it appears to be completely different to what everyone else read.

 

[elhadjihenry]

You forgot to mention all the Islamic jihadist stuff you can find on the net through a simple google search. But of course that wouldn’t sit with your agenda

What does google searching islamic jihadists have to do with twitters terms of service? Or does that discussion not suit your agenda so you had to change the subject?

 

[SM]

You forgot to mention all the Islamic jihadist stuff you can find on the net through a simple google search. But of course that wouldn’t sit with your agenda

What agenda? All he said was Twitter shouldn't have taken down her account - something you seemingly agree with. You are full blown bonkers today.

 

[Loonerty]

You forgot to mention all the Islamic jihadist stuff you can find on the net through a simple google search. But of course that wouldn’t sit with your agenda

Sounds like threatening violence to me

 

[WealstoneRaider]

Sorry, what exactly are you accusing me of defending?

No I asked you whether you recognised the hypocrisy of Hollywood. Go and re-read the post and feel free to actually answer my question

 

[SM]

No I asked you whether you recognised the hypocrisy of Hollywood. Go and re-read the post and feel free to actually answer my question

Pretty sure you accused me of defending something.

I've already said he deserved everything he got. You seem to agree, which is a nice change from your "lads will be lads" attitude towards Trumps indiscretions. While we're talking about hypocrisy...

 

[WealstoneRaider]

Pretty sure you accused me of defending something.

I've already said he deserved everything he got. You seem to agree, which is a nice change from your "lads will be lads" attitude towards Trumps indiscretions. While we're talking about hypocrisy...

“Lads will be lads” doesn’t actually mean it’s ok to rape, harass and manipulate women for sex in exchange for a career boost though

Don’t go to those desperate lengths SM

 

[Quivorir]

“Lads will be lads” doesn’t actually mean it’s ok to rape, harass and manipulate women for sex in exchange for a career boost though

Don’t go to those desperate lengths SM

What the **** are you on about?

 

[SM]

“Lads will be lads” doesn’t actually mean it’s ok to rape, harass and manipulate women for sex in exchange for a career boost though

Don’t go to those desperate lengths SM

Great, so you think Trump is deplorable and should be sacked?

 

[WealstoneRaider]

Great, so you think Trump is deplorable and should be sacked?

Yeah he should be sacked for saying “grab ‘em by the pussy” for sure. Deplorable. Weinstein and the rest of the Hollywood sect have nothing on that level of depravity

 

[SM]

Yeah he should be sacked for saying “grab ‘em by the pussy” for sure. Deplorable. Weinstein and the rest of the Hollywood sect have nothing on that level of depravity

Well, sure, that and the countless cases of sexual abuse, harrassment, etc. that have been levelled against him...

 

[WealstoneRaider]

Well, sure, that and the countless cases of sexual abuse, harrassment, etc. that have been levelled against him...

But nothing has come to light mate. If it does, then yes his position will become untenable, but until that day, I think we can all agree Hollywood is deplorable and I’m just going to watch this shit storm unfold with my popcorn

 

[SM]

But nothing has come to light mate. If it does, then yes his position will become untenable, but until then, I think we can all agree Hollywood is deplorable and I’m just going to watch this shit storm unfold with my popcorn

Plenty has come to light. Don't be so naive.

 

[WealstoneRaider]

Plenty has come to light. Don't be so naive.

You make me laugh

 

[SM]

You make me laugh

It amazes me that you can have your head so firmly stuck in the sand, but I guess this is where we leave it yet again.

 

[Cruyff14]

Just another normal day on Big Footy

 

[WealstoneRaider]

It amazes me that you can have your head so firmly stuck in the sand, but I guess this is where we leave it yet again.

What’s my head stuck in the sand about? The point isn’t about whether Trump is “deplorable” or not, it’s about all those sanctimonious Hollywood players taking the moral high ground and blasting Trump when all the time they are complicit with the sleazy going-on’s in their own back yard. If you can’t see the hypocrisy in that then you are just plain daft

 

[SM]

What’s my head stuck in the sand about? The point isn’t about whether Trump is “deplorable” or not, it’s about all those sanctimonious Hollywood players taking the moral high ground and blasting Trump when all the time they are complicit with the sleazy going-on’s in their own back yard. If you can’t see the hypocrisy in that then you are just plain daft

Lol. It's stuck in the ground because you're refusing to acknowledge that Trump has swept a lot of the same stuff under the rug and when the tip of the iceberg emerged last year with footage of him saying he would grab women by the genitals without their permission because he could do that since he was famous, and you dismissed it as "locker room bantz". If you are going to denounce the Hollywood elite for something, and criticise their hypocrisy, it's best not to do it when you yourself have priors.

 

[WealstoneRaider]

Lol. It's stuck in the ground because you're refusing to acknowledge that Trump has swept a lot of the same stuff under the rug and when the tip of the iceberg emerged last year with footage of him saying he would grab women by the genitals without their permission because he could do that since he was famous, and you dismissed it as "locker room bantz". If you are going to denounce the Hollywood elite for something, and criticise their hypocrisy, it's best not to do it when you yourself have priors.

As I said before, until concrete evidence comes out that Trump has r*ped or sexually abused women en mass like what goes on in Hollywood then what have I got to feel hypocritical about? If you are equating “locker room chat” to rape and systematic sexual abuse then you are an idiot

 

[SM]

As I said before, until concrete evidence comes out that Trump has r*ped or sexually abused women en mass like what goes on in Hollywood then what have I got to feel hypocritical about? If you are equating “locker room chat” to rape and systematic sexual abuse then you are an idiot

Which is why I say you have your head in the sand and are being incredibly naive about how the world works.

Here's some light reading material for you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations

His first wife said he r*ped her FFS, and there were witnesses to his assaults against her. What more concrete evidence do you want?

 

[Quivorir]

Which is why I say you have your head in the sand and are being incredibly naive about how the world works.

Here's some light reading material for you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations

His first wife said he r*ped her FFS, and there were witnesses to his assaults against her. What more concrete evidence do you want?

Nah mate thats on wikipedia. Don't you know anyone can edit that? Hildog and her cronies are playing funny buggers.

 

[Loonerty]

Which is why I say you have your head in the sand and are being incredibly naive about how the world works.

Here's some light reading material for you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations

His first wife said he r*ped her FFS, and there were witnesses to his assaults against her. What more concrete evidence do you want?

No no these are just allegations and can't be taken seriously.

 

[kangaspurs]

Anyone else find the whole Hollywood sleaze thing hilarious following their moral lecturing during the US elections last year? You couldn’t find a bigger bunch of hypocrites than you find in Hollywood

The same Hollywood elite that have come out and almost unanimously condemned Weinstein and his actions?