Bradesmaen
TheBrownDog
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2007
- Posts
- 64,153
- Reaction score
- 34,265
- Location
- Dublin
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- SJ Sharks/Everton/NY Jets
and are barely watched by intelligent people.There are equivalents in the UK and Australia.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 13
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
and are barely watched by intelligent people.There are equivalents in the UK and Australia.
No I didn't. Maybe you should read that again. I said people who want you to shut up and tow the government line are equivalent to fascists.You literally called people who have a different political view on immigration fascists.
I don't think Lineker should have anything happen to him. I mean trying to link an Indian and his Jewish deputy to being akin to Nazis is moronic but let him say it if he wants. There are plenty more modern examples he could have used, like Obama and Biden.
You probably should read up a few history books though. They weren't going after a religion, they were going after an ethnicity, even Christian Jews shared the same fate back then.
Out of interest, what media do you think intelligent people watch/read?and are barely watched by intelligent people.
The Daily Mail and the SunOut of interest, what media do you think intelligent people watch/read?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
You said conservatives are fascists.No I didn't. Maybe you should read that again. I said people who want you to shut up and tow the government line are equivalent to fascists.
Can't believe you are defending this crap.
"Christian Jews". Jaysus, next they'll be after the Catholic Muslims.
I like reading fiction from time to time too.The Daily Mail and the Sun
And? Look at how this has played out. Standard from the Conservative government is to crack the shits at the BBC for anything critical. They've been doing it for years.You said conservatives are fascists.
In the long run, people that just want the news without a political slant end up not bothering because its next to impossible to differentiate between news and PR nowadays.Never said it does. People who watch the news tend to look for media that tells them what they want to hear anyway. Whether that is Fox, CNN or whatever.
That's not actually true. People confuse critical analysis of either side (generally tends to be the government in power of the day) for slant.I guess that's where organisations like BBC/ABC come in, but they tend to be as bad as anyone nowadays and have been for some time.
Both Labour and Conservative governments have been critical of the BBC over the years. I don't see how this leads to your conclusion that all conservatives are fascists. Are you referring to voters, MP's or both? Most MP's in this government aren't really conservatives anyway. There are power hungry cretins on both sides of the house who have no morals and are in it solely for personal gain.And? Look at how this has played out. Standard from the Conservative government is to crack the shits at the BBC for anything critical. They've been doing it for years.
No I didn't. Maybe you should read that again. I said people who want you to shut up and tow the government line are equivalent to fascists.
Can't believe you are defending this crap.
"Christian Jews". Jaysus, next they'll be after the Catholic Muslims.
I wasn't referring to critical analysis of either side.That's not actually true. People confuse critical analysis of either side (generally tends to be the government in power of the day) for slant.
Have you ever learnt to read? Nothing of what the conservative government have done to the BBC is any equivalent to Dan Andrews because the Victorian Government doesn't have a TV station. Nor did they tell the ABC to get on board. In fact the ABC was critical of parts of the Andrews government as they should be.No they aren't. If that were the case then a lot of the people who vote Dan Andrews would qualify as fascists using that theory. Are they fascists?
Defending what? I said Lineker should be able to say what he said.
You seem to still not comprehend that the Jews were an ethnicity, not a religion.
Here's a book written by a Catholic Jew who went through WW2.
Evil That Surrounds Us: The WWII Memoir of Erna Becker-Kohen - Spicer, Kevin P, Cucchiara, Martina | 9780253029867 | Amazon.com.au | Books
Evil That Surrounds Us: The WWII Memoir of Erna Becker-Kohen [Spicer, Kevin P, Cucchiara, Martina] on Amazon.com.au. *FREE* shipping on eligible orders. Evil That Surrounds Us: The WWII Memoir of Erna Becker-Kohenwww.amazon.com.au
Labour have been critical over their reluctance to be critical of the conservative government because the conservatives keep threatening to pull funding. There is a distinct difference. And I'm referring to the MPs, they have continuously attempted to shut down any debate and anytime the BBC says anything critical of them they jump up and down and tell them to "get on the side of Team GB"Both Labour and Conservative governments have been critical of the BBC over the years. I don't see how this leads to your conclusion that all conservatives are fascists. Are you referring to voters, MP's or both? Most MP's in this government aren't really conservatives anyway. There are power hungry cretins on both sides of the house who have no morals and are in it solely for personal gain.
Have you ever learnt to read? Nothing of what the conservative government have done to the BBC is any equivalent to Dan Andrews because the Victorian Government doesn't have a TV station. Nor did they tell the ABC to get on board. In fact the ABC was critical of parts of the Andrews government as they should be.
I know that Jews are an ethnicity Judaism is a religion. This crap is irrelevant because nothing about their eradication was to do with differing political views as Gina the dope espoused, until she was given a chance to walk back her statements and time to come up with an excuse.
She said that after she was given a chance to come up with an excuse. She never said that in her original post and was not even close to saying that. Defending this crap is unintelligent.Oh please. As if Australian parties don't have mouthpieces in media outlets. Including the ABC and SBS.
No you don't know that. You just realised it. All your previous posts have you talking about the irrelevant religious aspect of it.
She said Governments and political parties are responsible for attempting to pit neighbour v neighbour against each other for their own gain. So if she's wrong for using the 30s past as an example then so is Lineker.
He could have used far more modern examples but he went full Godwin.
She said that after she was given a chance to come up with an excuse. She never said that in her original post and was not even close to saying that. Defending this crap is unintelligent.
You didn't need to read FAITH's posts.They don't need to read his Twitter feed either. Again, not complicated.
Yes it was SOOOOOOOOOOOO Obvious. It wasn't even a tweet, it was an instagram post. Shows you that you're defending stupidity with stupidity.Excuse for what?
It was obvious the tweet was saying don't hate on people because they hold differing views to yours, that hate can end up manifesting in things far worse.
And she's right, that's what the red and the blue parties do, stir up hate within their own supporters so that they go out and do their dirty work while the politicians sit back and profit from it.
Arggghhhhh
Run along child.Oh bullshit. You just hate hypocrisy being pointed out.
Without a doubt the same kind of clowns who got all hot under the collar about what she tweeted will be the among the same clowns now jumping to Lineker's defence.
When people post nonsense like below and try to paint a picture where what is going on with Lineker doesn't come from the other side as well then it's hard to take it serious. It's all tit for tat.
Yes it was SOOOOOOOOOOOO Obvious. It wasn't even a tweet, it was an instagram post. Shows you that you're defending stupidity with stupidity.
Her original post was obnoxious and incorrect and she was given the chance to correct the record and basically read from a prepared statement.
The rest of her views like masks, vaccines and voting irregularities shows she's been hit in the head far too many times.