The on topic thread 4.0

[Memphis]

And yet everyone is talking about United in this thread and across English football. Never ignored mate.

They love us.

 

[UnitedWarrior93]

Have to lol

Arsenal haven’t won the title in 20 years, still massive.

Liverpool went 30 years, were still massive.

United go 10 years and they’re ’irrelevant, shit and the northern spurs’ hahaha

 

[Art Vandelay_]

Have to lol

Arsenal haven’t won the title in 20 years, still massive.

Liverpool went 30 years, were still massive.

United go 10 years and they’re ’irrelevant, s**t and the northern spurs’ hahaha

You don't get hammers, Gooners and chavs fans singing about you at the Darts. That's the real prize clubs strive for, to be that rent free

 

[Jatz]

Have to lol

Arsenal haven’t won the title in 20 years, still massive.

Liverpool went 30 years, were still massive.

United go 10 years and they’re ’irrelevant, s**t and the northern spurs’ hahaha

Who said Arsenal are massive?

Liverpool were often the butt of many jokes until they won the title again.

 

[UnitedWarrior93]

Who said Arsenal are massive?

Liverpool were often the butt of many jokes until they won the title again.

Arsenal are a massive club, and Liverpool have always been despite not winning much for a very long time.

The notion that a club goes from being massive to irrelevant just because they haven’t won a league title in a while is quite silly.

Carlton still massive? Essendon?

 

[TheGreatBarryB]

Leeds and Bombers are still massive

 

[moomba]

Leeds and Bombers are still massive campaigners

FTFY

 

[Bostonian]

What the **** are the PL up too? Surely this can't be real, parody maybe?

If it is, how can they let Newcastle owners buy a club with their views and history yet they ban a woman who thinks men can't be women from going to games.

 

[RPCB]

What the * are the PL up too? Surely this can't be real, parody maybe?

If it is, how can they let Newcastle owners buy a club with their views and history yet they ban a woman who thinks men can't be women from going to games.

Because they are assholes?

 

[Bostonian]

Because they are assholes?

That goes well beyond being arseholes.

That's stalking at a minimum. Thats a crime.

 

[Cruyff14]

I'd argue that United weren't "massive" between the their ECC win and the resurgence under Ferguson.

Arsenal have never been on the same scale as United or Liverpool either.

 

[SM]

What the * are the PL up too? Surely this can't be real, parody maybe?

If it is, how can they let Newcastle owners buy a club with their views and history yet they ban a woman who thinks men can't be women from going to games.

Because it's hate speech? And she was warned and still did it?

 

[Bostonian]

Because it's hate speech? And she was warned and still did it?

Except it's not.

Gender Critical Speech is protected under section 10 of the Equality Act.

So in law it's not considered hate speech.


Unlike racist speech which is not protected under such laws.

 

[SM]

Except it's not.

Gender Critical Speech is protected under section 10 of the Equality Act.

So in law it's not considered hate speech.


Unlike racist speech which is not protected under such laws.

Was she warned with banning if she didn't desist?

 

[Bostonian]

Was she warned with banning if she didn't desist?

Desist with what?

Posting legally acceptable views upon her own social media?

Exactly what business is that of the EPL and why were they stalking her in the first place?

 

[SM]

Desist with what?

Posting legally acceptable views upon her own social media?

Exactly what business is that of the EPL and why were they stalking her in the first place?

Was she?

 

[Bostonian]

Was she?

Well you tell me. What do you know that everyone else doesn't know?

If what she stated is what she posted then that's none of the EPL's business.

 

[SM]

Well you tell me. What do you know that everyone else doesn't know?

If what she stated is what she posted then that's none of the EPL's business.

Yeah doesn't work like that.

 

[Bostonian]

Yeah doesn't work like that.

Doesn't it? How does it work then?

She's been banned for 3 years. That's the kind of punishment they give to fans found of guilty of racist speech at grounds.

 

[SM]

Doesn't it? How does it work then?

She's been banned for 3 years. That's the kind of punishment they give to fans found of guilty of racist speech at grounds.

Probably best to let it go. You're not doing yourself any favours.

 

[Bostonian]

Probably best to let it go. You're not doing yourself any favours.

What?

The PL has stalked someone that hasn't committed any offence and then had them banned isn't problematic to you?

So your advice is we should all ignore what the PL did and not find it disturbing the lengths they went too to spy one someone?

Did you even watch the video?

 

[Magma]

any proof it's even real?

 

[Bostonian]

any proof it's even real?

That's why I asked was it a parody.

If not it's disturbing.

 

[RossFC]

 

[Magma]

well he couldn't really as he had reached his 2 term limit that he himself brought in when he started. well actually i guess he could cos it's not like rules apply to these sorts usually.