Discussion The Random Discussion Thread

[StFly]

I haven't been through one of these negotiations but I would assume there is considerable pressure applied about not being believed, the reliving of the experience publicly, how much influence the club can bring to bear, and the significant resources of the club to spend time in court if they go to the police.

The women have been r*ped so I'm not sure how happy they are.

It's called assault for a reason, it's not just rape.

So in a case like say Lovett where it was obvious and consistent, yeah courts as menace to society. In a case like Lethers situation only one side then said "no thanks" and there was a bit of hands and light petting, money, as not a menace and more shifted nuances only.

They're both SA then, but the background to them are vastly different in intent.

This is part of why most clubs bleed money and take stances on behalf of wrongdoing on their ends and let's placate the victims as yeah, previously less oversight at clubland, lets recognise that and make reparations as is fitting. Doggies response smacks of Hawks previous injunctioned phase, and where there's smoke...

 

[NoisyMinor]

No that's the low carb eaters

Still waiting on your explanation of how bacon elicits a diabetic insulin response, Doogie Howser, M.D.

 

[DougalHoward]

Still waiting on your explanation of how bacon elicits a diabetic insulin response, Doogie Howser, M.D.


View attachment 1851506

Lol meat spikes your insulin the same as carbs/sugar, eating a lot of red and processed meat is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes

 

[NoisyMinor]

Lol meat spikes your insulin the same as carbs/sugar, eating a lot of red and processed meat is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes

Glycemic Index of Meats Complete Chart - Glycemic Index Guide

The GI is a measure used to determine how quickly and how much certain foods raise blood glucose levels. All meats have a glycemic index of ..

glycemic-index.net

Explain to me why you would need an excess of insulin to lower blood sugar levels from a food that doesn't even exist on the glycemic index.

Meat is a risk factor for everything if you believe the vegan and sugar industry propaganda.

 

[DougalHoward]

Glycemic Index of Meats Complete Chart - Glycemic Index Guide

The GI is a measure used to determine how quickly and how much certain foods raise blood glucose levels. All meats have a glycemic index of ..

glycemic-index.net

Explain to me why you would need an excess of insulin to lower blood sugar levels from a food that doesn't even exist on the glycemic index.

Meat is a risk factor for everything if you believe the vegan and sugar industry propaganda.

Dosent appear on the glycemic index because it dosent have carbs it will still produce an insulin response though...

 

[NoisyMinor]

Dosent appear on the glycemic index because it dosent have carbs it will still produce an insulin response though...

You don't seem to be able to differentiate between a normal insulin response and that in response to food containing carbs / sugar.

Since when does a plateau equate to a spike?

 

[George]

Keto campaigners going ape shit, what else is new

 

[PoppedCorn]

Lol meat spikes your insulin the same as carbs/sugar, eating a lot of red and processed meat is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes

No one mentioned processed food

 

[PoppedCorn]

Keto campaigners going ape s**t, what else is new

Keep swinging iron mike

 

[Dard Ball Get]

Lol meat spikes your insulin the same as carbs/sugar, eating a lot of red and processed meat is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes

 

[DougalHoward]

No one mentioned processed food

Bacon is a processed meat

 

[George]

Keep swinging iron mike

I've gotta lose 21 kilos in 4 weeks to make weight. Even still, never crossed my mind to get on the pissy grass diets

 

[NoisyMinor]

Bacon is a processed meat

Nitrates / Nitrites do not spike insulin.

 

[Yawkey way]

Lol meat spikes your insulin the same as carbs/sugar, eating a lot of red and processed meat is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes

Diabetes Australia recommends you stay under 130g of carbs and 25g of sugar a day. You‘re also meant to control the portions sizes of all protein not just red meat but carbs especially simple carbs will really spike your blood sugar. You can’t find a site about diabetes and diet that doesn’t have a lot of people who have dropped a lot of weight and are controlling their diabetes with low carb and keto/carnivore diets. I haven’t seen too many saying the whole carb thing is crap dig in, but whatever works for you.

 

[SaintsSeptember]

Left over Chilli Con Carnivore for lunch.
I kind of feel sorry for the families of the beans , but what can ya do.

 

[Dard Ball Get]

Diabetes Australia recommends you stay under 130g of carbs and 25g of sugar a day. You‘re also meant to control the portions sizes of all protein not just red meat but carbs especially simple carbs will really spike your blood sugar. You can’t find a site about diabetes and diet that doesn’t have a lot of people who have dropped a lot of weight and are controlling their diabetes with low carb and keto/carnivore diets. I haven’t seen too many saying the whole carb thing is crap dig in, but whatever works for you.

Carbs being the only non-essential macronutrient says it all

 

[SaintsSeptember]

All my meat is processed, its not like i'm going to chew on a cow.

 

[bergholt]

Don’t buy too much shit with an ingredient list and you won’t go too far wrong

 

[DougalHoward]

Diabetes Australia recommends you stay under 130g of carbs and 25g of sugar a day. You‘re also meant to control the portions sizes of all protein not just red meat but carbs especially simple carbs will really spike your blood sugar. You can’t find a site about diabetes and diet that doesn’t have a lot of people who have dropped a lot of weight and are controlling their diabetes with low carb and keto/carnivore diets. I haven’t seen too many saying the whole carb thing is crap dig in, but whatever works for you.

Diabetes is a disease caused by gluttony not carbohydrates

 

[DougalHoward]

Carbs being the only non-essential macronutrient says it all

I thought aero bars were essential???

 

[Dard Ball Get]

I thought aero bars were essential???

Of course not, they were just props used to sucker lil George into straying from his fight diet. Worked a treat, the lil oinker couldn’t help himself!

 

[st_trav_ofWA]

Has this already been posted

Tom Elliott calls out St Kilda following gender quota job application criteria

Tom Elliott has called out the St Kilda Football Club after a recent job application outlined a gender quota ambition as one of its employer questions. Tom urged the Saints to focus on on-field success, rather than look to hire people based on quotas. Click PLAY to hear Tom Elliott explain why...

www.3aw.com.au

What effing next

again another post that im specifically passionate about has drawn me out of hidernation ...
in my work life a big portion of what i do is employing the workforce and the idea of quotas is a big area of concern at the moment in lots of business's - the fear held by many is that a person will get a job they are not qualified for just because of ther gender, sexual preferance or identity.

lets turn the clock back not too far back into the past where it was the "right man for the job" mentality in that time if it was coming down to employing a man or a woman for the job 99.9% the man got it regardless of who was the better candidate because the bias towards males was prevelant... This was widely accepted as just a fact of life

Fast forward a few years and mentalitys changed to the point were if a man and a woman applied for the job if the woman was clearly the better candidate she got the job but if things were equal the man would still usually get the job, in this situation the bias towards men was lowered and we were working towards equality but still it wasnt equal the wmoan had to be above and beyond to be considered superior to the male candidate. again this was widely accepted as a fact of life

What we see now with the drive to bring equality quota's into work places is a shift in that bias so now if a man & woman are after the same role if the man is the standout candidate he gets the job, if the candidates are equal the employers are looking at the representation and awarding the job to the female candidate - this is blowing everyones mind..

The fact of it is we have had male dominate work force since the consept of employment started, we have have generation after generation of women not even considered for roles - we brought that forward to an extent but the gap was still massive so promoting a midset shift to swap the preferance when everything is considered equal to favour females more is working to get a more even workforce .. From that we are seeing accross a large number of industrys productivity improving significantly as they move closer to an equal representation.. but again some people are threatend by this after generations of being treated one way when the roles flip it can cause a lot of anger ....
the thought that any business would turn down the best available for un unqulified female for a quota target is in most cases a story told by a over inflated ego who missed out on a job to a person who they feel superior to so they need to justify their hurt feelings by making it some sort of agenda against them.

 

[George]

again another post that im specifically passionate about has drawn me out of hidernation ...
in my work life a big portion of what i do is employing the workforce and the idea of quotas is a big area of concern at the moment in lots of business's - the fear held by many is that a person will get a job they are not qualified for just because of ther gender, sexual preferance or identity.

lets turn the clock back not too far back into the past where it was the "right man for the job" mentality in that time if it was coming down to employing a man or a woman for the job 99.9% the man got it regardless of who was the better candidate because the bias towards males was prevelant... This was widely accepted as just a fact of life

Fast forward a few years and mentalitys changed to the point were if a man and a woman applied for the job if the woman was clearly the better candidate she got the job but if things were equal the man would still usually get the job, in this situation the bias towards men was lowered and we were working towards equality but still it wasnt equal the wmoan had to be above and beyond to be considered superior to the male candidate. again this was widely accepted as a fact of life

What we see now with the drive to bring equality quota's into work places is a shift in that bias so now if a man & woman are after the same role if the man is the standout candidate he gets the job, if the candidates are equal the employers are looking at the representation and awarding the job to the female candidate - this is blowing everyones mind..

The fact of it is we have had male dominate work force since the consept of employment started, we have have generation after generation of women not even considered for roles - we brought that forward to an extent but the gap was still massive so promoting a midset shift to swap the preferance when everything is considered equal to favour females more is working to get a more even workforce .. From that we are seeing accross a large number of industrys productivity improving significantly as they move closer to an equal representation.. but again some people are threatend by this after generations of being treated one way when the roles flip it can cause a lot of anger ....
the thought that any business would turn down the best available for un unqulified female for a quota target is in most cases a story told by a over inflated ego who missed out on a job to a person who they feel superior to so they need to justify their hurt feelings by making it some sort of agenda against them.

The market dictates which types of people are employed. Same as the nonsensical "wage gap", the market dictates that.

Applying for a job should be competitive, it shouldn't be watered down so companies can happy-clap over quotas. If a female wants a role in a male dominated industry, she'll need to display more of the characteristics required to beat others for that role.

For example some employers look for assertiveness in their employees, and typically men are more assertive than women. If a woman wants to win one of these roles, she'll need to display the level of assertiveness required. Same goes for traits like empathy which are required for positions like nursing - an area which females dominate.

I work in organisational psychology and see this sort of stuff all the time. We work with men and women to develop their skills in communication, team work, leadership, etc and also work specifically with people who are either looking for a career change or students just coming out of high school.

It's not about equal representation of gender, it's about equal representation of the skills required to be a well functioning team. I have strengths and blindspots, if everyone in my team has the same strengths and blindspots then we only paint half the picture. However if we employ people who are strong in the areas I'm not, the team improves dramatically and becomes more efficient.

People think about these things way too simplistically. We're in 2023, no employer is hiring people solely based on gender.

 

[George]

Of course not, they were just props used to sucker lil George into straying from his fight diet. Worked a treat, the lil oinker couldn’t help himself!

My name always on the tip of your tongue, isn't it?

 

[StFly]

All my meat is processed, its not like i'm going to chew on a cow.

They don't generally appreciate that, and you have to also get used to the smell if you're not around them all that often. Then again, some cows are kinky like that and you might get more than you bargain for.