- Joined
- Jan 25, 2011
- Posts
- 9,156
- Reaction score
- 4,708
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Webber, Ricciardo, NE Patriots
You gotta eatThat's a nice dining table. A tad expensive - but nice.![]()

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

You gotta eatThat's a nice dining table. A tad expensive - but nice.![]()

It depends on the safety net. Even if it's a 99% chance of 100 million and a 1% chance of absolutely nothing, vs 100% chance of 1 million, I'll take 1 million thanks.
If there was a "safety net" in the event that I miss out on 100 million, then I'd be willing to gamble.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Would take the million without a second’s hesitation. Buy a nice comfortable house, a nice car plus another one to restore, and invest the rest (prob 300k or so) in the best business opportunity I can find or come up with. That’s a very good start-up fund.
In ten years the business will be flying and I’d just sell it, or pay someone to run it while I scoot around the world doing whatever I want.
The thing about the $100m is the alternative, where you don’t win, is pretty bad. People think “oh I’d be no worse of so it’s not too bad”... but the mind doesn’t work like that... it would eat you up for the rest of your life... “I was so, so , so close to having a completely different life”... you’d just wind up as one of those sad sacks leaning on the bar dribbling beer and crying about what might have been. No thanks.
90% of businesses fail.
50/50 are much better odds.
Here is an alternative to your sad sack story. You win the 100 Mil. Life is awsome. The end.
Yes those businesses too.Not businesses where the owners have significant start-up capital and plenty of time and money to plan things properly.
It’s not a direct comparison, you have absolutely zero control over the 50/50 $100m.
100m every time.
If theres a small risk between buying everyone you know a mansion or a dingy or nothing, you go for the mansion. Every. Single. Time.

Yes those businesses too.
Would you really though? Even though you say it now I bet if the opportunity ever arose most people would change their mind and take the sure thing.I would defaintly have a 50/50 crack at $100 mil.
bankroll management broYep. $1m would not mean never working again. I'd lose and it would eat me up thinking I could have had $1m but it's the right choice, mathematically. Of course, if it was $10m or coin flip $100m and I'd take the $10m as that is enough to set me up for life.
Mathematically, it's the right option. You need to make financial decisions based on maths not emotion, otherwise they are not financial decisions. Conversely if it was a 1% chance to win $100m or a guaranteed $1m, I would take the $1m. Any percentage above that and you are better off taking your chances.Would you really though? Even though you say it now I bet if the opportunity ever arose most people would change their mind and take the sure thing.
bankroll management bro
you basically already have the $1 million in your pocket. If your net worth is ~$1.1 million, its terrible bankroll management to put $1 mill on a even money chance even if you are getting 99-1 odds
sorry, i was meaning if the $1.1mill net worth was inclusive of the $1mill you effectively now have. yeah, if you're worth $5mill + you'd take the +EV bet but in most of our positions I'd suggest its just poor bankroll managementWhat would Kelly suggest? You should bet ~50% of your BR on that event. In saying that, I guess you need to consider what your BR is though. Either way, for mine it would be take the coin flip under that scenario.
Yes I really would.Would you really though? Even though you say it now I bet if the opportunity ever arose most people would change their mind and take the sure thing.
I got that. If your net worth is more than $1m currently (or around that) add the $1m guaranteed and you should be willing to risk half that ($1m) to have a 50% chance of $100m, according to Kelly. You raise an interesting (and valid) point.sorry, i was meaning if the $1.1mill net worth was inclusive of the $1mill you effectively now have. yeah, if you're worth $5mill + you'd take the +EV bet but in most of our positions I'd suggest its just poor bankroll management
Mathematically, it's the right option. You need to make financial decisions based on maths not emotion, otherwise they are not financial decisions. Conversely if it was a 1% chance to win $100m or a guaranteed $1m, I would take the $1m. Any percentage above that and you are better off taking your chances.
I'm surprised at how far people think $1m will go, especially those who are talking about buying a home with it.
oh, it's still an investment decision. you just know the probabilities of success upfront rather than having to estimate them. the issue is that expected value is not the only mathematical input to put into the decision, you have to consider bankroll management (or the equivalent investment term) as wellExcept this isn’t a “financial decision”. We’re not talking about an investment decision here. You can’t influence the outcome through good management or hedging your position. It’s pure dumb luck, a coin toss. You wouldn’t approach it as you would any other financial decision, where you have some control over the outcome.