Strategy Trade and List management Thread Part 5 (opposition supporters - READ posting rules before posting)

[doggies ftw]

Amazing how many people don’t seem to comprehend that!


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

I think people obviously comprehend it, he’ll get where he wants to go but that still puts pressure on the situation & tilts the leverage a bit.

If Brissy aren’t playing fair and we say Josh Brissy won’t get a deal done but GC are happy to match your 6 years at 750k etc and hey it’s just down the road! It means he’s either that desperate to get out he’ll be fine with that, which at least makes Brissy realise they have to play ball as there’s other realistic competition.

They have zero leverage so make them pay, talking to GC is the way to do that

 

[Dogs Rule]

Nah, only Dogs Rule's

Nah, my heart is hard towards him. Solid as concrete.

 

[maddog37]

After the bombers debacle you would expect his manager has a deal already struck before announcing his preferred club.

Likely already agreed upon surely.

 

[Dogs Rule]

I’ve felt for a while that what the dogs are missing is a real barometer. Thoughts?

Edit: I thought I was on the trade board thread, apologies!

Hopefully your club is a bit more 'professional' than that...for Dunkley's sake.

 

[Chops]

Pick 15 and future first for Pick 29 and Dunkley.

I'd assume we try and get a fringe player and flick them 37 too

No thanks


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Freshwater]

Does the club manipulate the best and fairest like other clubs have done in the past, so it’s not a big let down for the major club function of the year? As well as the negative media we get if a reining b&f walks out of the club. Do we let him win it and have better negotiation material?

 

[Ash1337]

Ouch 6yrs and 750k. Dunks fleeced lions there.

 

[VitalDread]

Names i would guess Lions would offer

Kai Lohmann
Ely Smith
Kalin Lane
Thomas Berry

16

Thomas Berry

Age

25

Ht

185cm

Wt

80kg

Pos.

Fwd

Career

Season

Last 5

D

7.8

2star

K

3.2

1star

HB

4.6

3star

M

2.0

2star

T

2.2

4star

G

0.0

1star

D

7.8

2star

K

3.2

1star

HB

4.6

3star

M

2.0

2star

T

2.2

3star

G

0.0

1star

D

7.8

2star

K

3.2

2star

HB

4.6

4star

M

2.0

3star

T

2.2

4star

G

0.0

1star

 

[Bald]

No thanks


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

We aren’t getting much more than that. I think it’s actually a good deal.

 

[Mofra]

After the failed bomber trade 2years ago surely Dunkley and Pickering has done his due diligence to ensure they can satisfy us.

There was talk that going to a team that can get a deal done was part of his consideration.
Brisbane normally trade in good faith so I suspect a deal gets done

 

[Dogs_r_barking]

They don’t have enough draft assets they will have to give us a player. Let’s go shopping.

 

[jdz101]

Ouch 6yrs and 750k. Dunks fleeced lions there.

Not really. That's the ballpark of what I hoped we'd offer him to stay.

 

[missfinland]

Names i would guess Lions would offer

Kai Lohmann
Ely Smith
Kalin Lane
Thomas Berry

you can remove Kai of the list i would assume.

 

[BulldogMuscle]

Waiting for Daddy Dunkley to post about how our club is screwed and how much better off Josh will be at Brisbane.

 

[Tri_Colours]

Maybe I'm just down in the dumps because another one of our players wants to leave, but would we be high on the list of most ex-players on other teams lists (behind GWS and Gold Coast probably)?

 

[Angak]

I think people obviously comprehend it, he’ll get where he wants to go but that still puts pressure on the situation & tilts the leverage a bit.

If Brissy aren’t playing fair and we say Josh Brissy won’t get a deal done but GC are happy to match your 6 years at 750k etc and hey it’s just down the road! It means he’s either that desperate to get out he’ll be fine with that, which at least makes Brissy realise they have to play ball as there’s other realistic competition.

They have zero leverage so make them pay, talking to GC is the way to do that

GC have an abundance of big bodies in midfield. Dunkley is the last thing they need.

The easiest way to get this done is future first and future second or third.

 

[Dogs Rule]

you can remove Kai of the list i would assume.

Thanks Bud, what's your interest?

 

[dergert]

you can remove Kai of the list i would assume.

Why?

 

[Angak]

They don’t have enough draft assets they will have to give us a player. Let’s go shopping.

Can we not just ask for a future first and future a second/third pick?

This seems pretty simple to me.

 

[missfinland]

We aren’t getting much more than that. I think it’s actually a good deal.

i think its a good deal, will be very close to this.

2 first rd picks for dunkley and a second back.

 

[Foxman98]

Can we not just ask for a future first and future a second/third pick?

This seems pretty simple to me.

The easy offer is This years First, McStay Compo + Next years first with us sending 3rds/4ths this year and next year back so they have points we get good value picks. Their picks are irrelevant they just need points

 

[geoffjennings79]

Apart from my growing dislike of Dunkley as recent weeks have passed (I don't begrudge him setting himself up for life, more the self-flagellating 'brand' promotion), I really hope he, his manager and his father all simultaneously choke on their Weeties (can't post what I really feel, keen to avoid a perma-ban!).

 

[Angak]

Pick 15 and future first for Pick 29 and Dunkley.

I'd assume we try and get a fringe player and flick them 37 too

This is not happening. All of this year's picks are being used for Ashcroft.

Future first and a future second or third is what is likely to happen.

 

[Doggy]

This is not happening. All of this year's picks are being used for Ashcroft.

Future first and a future second or third is what is likely to happen.

Thanks Mr List Manager

 

[Hoges64]

GC have an abundance of big bodies in midfield. Dunkley is the last thing they need.

The easiest way to get this done is future first and future second or third.

The easiest way to get it done is their 1st this year, their first next year, and give them back our 2nd or Norths 3rd this year for the points they need for F/S. And / or maybe a 3rd / 4th next year to help "balance the scales".

Doubt they'd want to give up their first and second this year, that would put them well behind on required points.