I think it is time for exactly the opposite of the approach Barlow is through and through a Fremantle player so he has to stay. It will significantly hinder the speed of our rebuild if we hold on to players who have some trade value who won't be around in four years. Signing Barlow to a two year extension would also rob Blakely and Balic time playing in the guts. There is an obvious contradiction that it seems the same posters who want us to rebuild and improve skills also want Barlow to be resigned. It would be a massive mistake if we don't at least see the trade value of all players older than 25 bar Yarran.Not sure how credible it is. But this popped up in my facebook feed, heart dropped when I saw it. Really would be a step too far, sure we're rebuilding but Barlow is a must to have around the club. He is Freo through and through, and deserves to play be a lifetime member by playing 150 games.
Look at teams that have rebuilt brilliantly over the years. Those teams all made hard decisions. I think some here overemphasise the fact good blokes should not be traded.
Last edited: