Trade hypotheticals

[Cringle]

If I was Brisbane, I'd play hard ball with Pick 4 only, and let Beams do the work saying the deal needs to be done.

At 1:30pm on the last day of trade week you'll throw in a fringe player of sorts (like a golby), and will be seen to be more fair, and the deal will get done.

But we would say that... we're Carlton supporters!

 

[SnowRoo]

Norths 1st and 3rd
for
O'Rourke and Frost

fair?

 

[Nintendo Jones]

Norths 1st and 3rd
for
O'Rourke and Frost

fair?

Market value? No. Not enough value for GWS. But, as both have requested trades, who knows?

 

[LukeParkerno1]

Don't mind that trade. O'Rourke is worth lets say pick 25, and Frost is around pick 35. North a first plus 3rd is around the mark

 

[Primetime Pricey]

O'Rourke and 20 for Beams? I would like to hear the reaction at Collingwood if that was put on their table!!

 

[Dan12]

I think a 3 way trade would be beneficial for Collingwood so they can get experience and reasonable compensation. Something like this:

Brisbane trade 4/5, 25 and Ryan Lester for Dayne Beams and North's second pick
Collingwood trade a 3rd rounder and Beams for Mullett, Lester and 4/5
North trade Mullett and their second for 25 and 50ish

Or...

Brisbane trade its first two picks for Beams
Collingwood trade Beams and Lumumba for 4/5 and Clark
Melbourne trade Clark for 25 and Lumumba

The Pies could easily leave unsatisfied in a deal with only Brisbane. I wouldn't mind it if our recruiters said to Collingwood 'go and find the senior player/s you want, then come back and we'll see if we can work them into a deal.'

 

[aussierulesrules]

If the talk that Shiel still wants out of GWS is correct and they are shopping him around to clubs like St Kilda and Melbourne, as has been rumoured to be the case, then Collingwood ought to try and get in on that action. I dare say Shiel would prefer to go to Collingwood than either of the lower ranked clubs.

 

[ManOfClay]

Garlett for Jones and our 2nd round pick?

 

[eaglespremiers]

If the talk that Shiel still wants out of GWS is correct

His manager was emphatic that Shiel didn't want to leave GWS.
Take that as you will.

 

[Prochard123]

Fair points. It was more me trying to get the more mature player to Collingwood.

Personally I think what I have Brisbane giving up is close to our limit. Only extra thing that might happen is if one of our young fringe gets put in the deal.

What about this:

Beams >> Brisbane
Pick 4, pick 20 and Jaksch >> Collingwood
Pick 28 and pick 24 >> GWS

Would be happy with that

 

[Shaneprice97]

Garlett for Jones and our 2nd round pick?

Thats serious overs for Garlett in my opinion.

 

[ManOfClay]

Thats serious overs for Garlett in my opinion.

Jones spent the last half of the year in our VFL side. Carlton want him and seem to want to get rid of Garlett.

 

[Shaneprice97]

Jones spent the last half of the year in our VFL side. Carlton want him and seem to want to get rid of Garlett.

A straight swap without your 2nd round pick should be fine.

 

[ManOfClay]

A straight swap without your 2nd round pick should be fine.

I'd jump at that.

 

[trooroo4life]

Garlett for Jones and our 2nd round pick?

Your overrating Garlett imo, can't see Carlton getting much for him from anybody.

 

[ManOfClay]

Your overrating Garlett imo, can't see Carlton getting much for him from anybody.

It's not like we're offering much.

 

[trooroo4life]

It's not like we're offering much.

I think you would probably get a 2nd Rd pick off of a club maybe even Carlton for Jones.

 

[ManOfClay]

I think you would probably get a 2nd Rd pick off of a club maybe even Carlton for Jones.

Would rather Garlett to be honest. Has shown to be quite capable putting aside the off-field stuff.

 

[Defacto]

Garlett for Jones and our 2nd round pick?

done...i assume you mean clinton jones

 

[LukeParkerno1]

Would rather Garlett to be honest. Has shown to be quite capable putting aside the off-field stuff.

Of all sides why? You have Dahalus!

 

[Oddhawk]

Brisbane out 4 & 24
In Beams, 28

Hawks out Suckling and 18
In 24, Jacksh

Collingwood out Beams, 28
4 and Suckling

GWS out Jacksh
In 18

 

[ManOfClay]

Of all sides why? You have Dahalus!

Dahlhaus plays more up the ground these days. Garlett can be the traditional crumber. Would much rather him taking shots at goal, Dahl is a little inaccurate.

 

[LukeParkerno1]

Brisbane out 4 & 24
In Beams, 28

Hawks out Suckling and 18
In 24, Jacksh

Collingwood out Beams, 28
4 and Suckling

GWS out Jacksh
In 18

Not sure why Collingwood would go near Suckling. He would be more for a side that is challenging right now. At the right price a side in the top 5.

 

[Oddhawk]

Not sure why Collingwood would go near Suckling. He would be more for a side that is challenging right now. At the right price a side in the top 5.

Figure they need an elite kick in their back half. Not quite 27. They don't need defenders. The other that springs to mind is Shoe if they play him forward but doesn't really fit the trade.

 

[LukeParkerno1]

Figure they need an elite kick in their back half. Not quite 27. They don't need defenders. The other that springs to mind is Shoe if they play him forward but doesn't really fit the trade.

Wouldn't it make sense for instance to trade with Freo/North or another side near a premiership. Suckling is your icing, he isn't what I'd build a backline around.