List Mgmt. Trade Week 2016 - Live Thread

[Optemizer]

Keyser said if there isn't a pick on Waterman till after our pick 54 we can take Waterman with pick 106 .

Ps we dont have pick 73 anymore .

I know we don't have pick 73 anymore, 73 is the last pick worth points is why i mentioned it.

 

[Dark Sharks]

I found a video of Port's recruiting manager in action this draft period.

No joke, this is actually the first time i even remembered Port actually exists since before trade period started.

 

[Forward Press]

This is actually the first time i even remembered Port actually exists since before trade period started.

I occasionally forget Port even exists, period.

Few fans here in Perth, never on FTA TV unless they play us or the Dockers, mediocre at best for all but one season since 119.

 

[boondy]

I went to Adelaide Once

 

[Agent93]

Slightly disappointed we didn't pick up Adams. I'd assume Dogs wanted more than we'd be prepared to give up, if there was any discussion at all.

 

[paran]

More like drafting isn't an exact science, even with high draft picks.

12/28 kept with 4 traded for good value. 16/28. 57% strike rate is actually pretty good.

More like they got a return on best 22 players and the rest weren't really in future calculations! Waaay too much talent there. Looks like they're not even going to have a crack at either Perryman or Setterfield or Scheer or Mutch (they'll likely only get one of them with pick 15)., and they'll be fine. Hopper and Kennedy, guns drafted last year, have hardly been sighted.

 

[FatPizza]

I went to Adelaide Once

I've been there once too. Then I jumped on the connecting flight to Melbourne.

 

[flyinghi64]

Very generous to Collingwood

Me thinks that "D" is for Dumb.

 

[darksquare]

Unless it is pick 55, then we go into 10 points of debt for next season. I'm not sure how that works though, it probably just means our first rounder is worth 10 points less which doesn't change its position.

The points are deducted from the pick in the corresponding round (in this case 2017 round 4). Don't know offhand what our 4th round pick is next year, but 10 points is likely to move it down a place or two. Should still be enough for Hodge, Burgoyne or Gibson, though.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Miguel Sanchez]

Slightly disappointed we didn't pick up Adams. I'd assume Dogs wanted more than we'd be prepared to give up, if there was any discussion at all.

Think they probably just refused to deal once Hamling was going out the door.

 

[ChampRevesby]

 

[Dark Sharks]

See? I was joking all along you idiots. You all thought i was being serious.

 

[the harry]

Thanks

 

[Optemizer]

Gold coast in a good position lets see if they can stuff this up aswell.

 

[CM9000]

Since the trade period has finished, and we didn't trade for any second rounders, this is probably what our draft will look like:
1. SPP
2. Ryan
3. Waterman
4. Cameron

 

[Agent93]

Quick review - we were the equal 3rd least active team in the trade period (with Essendon) being involved in 2 transactions, behind Adelaide and Port involved in 1 transaction.

I was critical of Geelong so I figure I go over what they've done so far:

In: Tuohy, Black, Pick 24, 64, 72, 2017 2nd Rd (CARL)
Out: Kersten, Caddy, Smedts, Vardy, Pick 56, 92, 2017 1st Rd (GEEL)

Main list de-listed / Retired: Enright, Bartel

Rookies de-listed: Bates, Cornell, Delaney, Lucey, Read

So 6 out, 2 in. 4 list sports (currently) with picks 24, 38, 42, 64 (plus lower ones which can't be used atm). A replacement Kersten, and lesser replacement Enright. Vardy and Smedts not best 22 so the losses to cover are really Bartel and Caddy.

I don't think they got better this year, or next with the trade out of the first rounder.

 

[ep2018]

Since the trade period has finished, and we didn't trade for any second rounders, this is probably what our draft will look like:
1. SPP
2. Ryan
3. Waterman
4. Cameron

Hope so. I reckon Ryan is worth the second round pick.

 

[Beutbrute]

Yep thats the only thing I could think of too. Hope Port get screwed and their slider gets picked up.

I can't remember where I read it, but Port are meant to be interested in Ryan, so he could be the player they're interested in with this pick
I think Ryan's dad would have played with Paddy Ryder's dad too

 

[liam123]

Since the trade period has finished, and we didn't trade for any second rounders, this is probably what our draft will look like:
1. SPP
2. Ryan
3. Waterman
4. Cameron

More like Gold Coast will steal all the WA boys before our first rounder

 

[The Falcon Strike]

More like Gold Coast will steal all the WA boys before our first rounder

Hopefully it is a case of once bitten, twice shy

 

[CM9000]

I can't remember where I read it, but Port are meant to be interested in Ryan, so he could be the player they're interested in with this pick
I think Ryan's dad would have played with Paddy Ryder's dad too

Port can **** off then, Ryan is ours.

They already have Wingard.

 

[Beutbrute]

Ahhh, I look at that and all I see is "Risk Assessment" with that colour combo

 

[Dark Sharks]

Swear Ryan has gone from "would like to see him possibly as a rookie" to "take him before SPP with our first" overnight.

 

[ChampRevesby]

Ahhh, I look at that and all I see is "Risk Assessment" with that colour combo

Risk Matrices are the bane of my existence.

 

[bombard]

Nothing like being rated by a coach who got sacked by Richmond, but I'd have to wait and see what Damien Drum, Michael Voss and Mark Neeld think first.

Sorry Terry if you're reading this.

Don't be silly - Terry doesn't read about football.