Remove this Banner Ad

Training Training Thread 2023

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

come on mate, he averaged less than 1 kick in a game. Taylor was in our 7th for turnovers last year. (BTW Stevo was 5th and Scott 13th!)
When you play half back like he did in the first half of the year and chipping sideways to uncontested player or short uncontested kicks 15-20m up ahead that usually results in less turnovers

The other 2 have far more talent than bailey and were playing further up the ground kicking into out numbered forwards
 
When you play half back like he did in the first half of the year and chipping sideways to uncontested player or short uncontested kicks 15-20m up ahead that usually results in less turnovers

The other 2 have far more talent than bailey
Thats not the roll Scott played. Every player has cheap easy stats in their total. All Stevo does is seagull yet for some reason you have it as a negative for Scott and a positive for Stevo. And despite Stevo always getting the ball on the outside with no pressure he was the 5th worst for turnovers.

You need to apply the same judgment criteria for all players. By your terms of reference either Stevo and Scott are both shit or they are both very good.
 
Thats not the roll Scott played. Every player has cheap easy stats in their total. All Stevo does is seagull yet for some reason you have it as a negative for Scott and a positive for Stevo. And despite Stevo always getting the ball on the outside with no pressure he was the 5th worst for turnovers.

You need to apply the same judgment criteria for all players. By your terms of reference either Stevo and Scott are both s**t or they are both very good.
Sleevo played that role for maybe 2-3 games that was it

I rate players based on talent and if the talent is not quite elite or high then mongrel

Bailey lacks both
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Sleevo played that role for maybe 2-3 games that was it

I rate players based on talent and if the talent is not quite elite or high then mongrel

Bailey lacks both
but he clearly has more talent than Stevo cause Stevo is the 5th for turnovers and has more clangers and has a poorer DE than Scott. Stevo doesn't have talent he just occasionally sparkles and the sparkle of a fake diamond grabs you everytime.
 
but he clearly has more talent than Stevo cause Stevo is the 5th for turnovers and has more clangers and has a poorer DE than Scott. Stevo doesn't have talent he just occasionally sparkles and the sparkle of a fake diamond grabs you everytime.
Coaches may rate based on work ethic etc

And luckily those coaches have left

Sleevo is a top 6 pick rising star winner and arguably most talented player on our list. Bailey is not

Bailey is a Sam Gibson hard worker type that lacks talent/skill of his teammates
 
View attachment 1620247

They're peculiarly close statistically. Practically the same player - age, height, weight, numbers.

I rate Scott well ahead though. He can play multiple defined roles in a team. Curtis isn't prolific enough for wing or reliable enough as a forward target. He's a player searching for a position.

Was surprised how closely matched they were. Thought Curtis would be well in front on forward related stats and Bailey would have him covered for mid/wing related stats. There you are though.

Need Baily to get up to an average of 20-25 touches per game to lift him to the next level.
 
Coaches may rate based on work ethic etc

And luckily those coaches have left

Sleevo is a top 6 pick rising star winner and arguably most talented player on our list. Bailey is not

Bailey is a Sam Gibson hard worker type that lacks talent/skill of his teammates
Who is your dealer? If you're getting your drugs on the cheap it's surely a bargain considering how much you must be smoking when you made this post.
 
Broadly speaking, I would expect Bailey to outperform Stevo in a badly performing team. However, if the team is playing well, I’d expect the reverse. If, I was being harsh on both, I’d say one is a “toiler” and the other is a “cream on top” player. At the end of the day, one of each type is required in a successful team. Probably, no more than one of each. Both players have a great opportunity to be part of our next flag push, given their age.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

Remove this Banner Ad

How did Jaidyn come into this?

His talent level eclipses most guys on the list. Nobody else on our list bar McDonald and Shiels have gone near being a Rising Star winner or a premiership player.
MAV brought him up cos he knows I rate sleevo but you are right has nothing to do with this

The question is more Curtis Taylor vs bailey Scott for the wing

Which as per your post is very similar stat wise but I rate Taylor higher
 
Western Bulldogs v North Melbourne at Ikon Park, 1.10pm

B:
J.Ziebell 7 B.McKay 23 F.Perez 39
HB: L.McDonald 21 (C) A.Bonar 16 J.Goater 31
C: B.Scott 8 J.Simpkin 12 (C) K.Turner 28
HF: T.Powell 24 C.Comben 30 P.Curtis 25
F: C.Zurhaar 44 N.Larkey 20 H.Sheezel 3
Foll: T.Goldstein 22 B.Cunnington 10 W.Phillips 29
I/C: G.Logue 19 L.Davies-Uniacke 9 L.Shiels 14 T.Xerri 38 J.Stephenson 2 M.Bergman 27 C.Coleman-Jones 21 H.Greenwood 18

Emerg: K.Dawson 42 E.Ford 40 C.Lazzaro 35 L.Young 17
 
How did Jaidyn come into this?

His talent level eclipses most guys on the list. Nobody else on our list bar McDonald and Shiels have gone near being a Rising Star winner or a premiership player.
He came into because The Nostradamus doesnt rate Scott because of his turn overs. What was it you called him? King of The Turnover? Yet Stevo, who he rates so highly, had way more turnovers last year. So it's just another example of TN shouldn't be ranking players.
 
He came into because The Nostradamus doesnt rate Scott because of his turn overs. What was it you called him? King of The Turnover? Yet Stevo, who he rates so highly, had way more turnovers last year. So it's just another example of TN shouldn't be ranking players.
bottom line is i dont rate bailey scott as he is not very talented

he's a sam gibson type
 
bottom line is i dont rate bailey scott as he is not very talented

he's a sam gibson type
Bottom line is, since the best coach in the modern era has named Scott on a Wing, Stevo on the extended bench and Taylor not in the side, you shouldn't rate players.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Western Bulldogs v North Melbourne at Ikon Park, 1.10pm

B:
J.Ziebell 7 B.McKay 23 F.Perez 39
HB: L.McDonald 21 (C) A.Bonar 16 J.Goater 31
C: B.Scott 8 J.Simpkin 12 (C) K.Turner 28
HF: T.Powell 24 C.Comben 30 P.Curtis 25
F: C.Zurhaar 44 N.Larkey 20 H.Sheezel 3
Foll: T.Goldstein 22 B.Cunnington 10 W.Phillips 29
I/C: G.Logue 19 L.Davies-Uniacke 9 L.Shiels 14 T.Xerri 38 J.Stephenson 2 M.Bergman 27 C.Coleman-Jones 21 H.Greenwood 18

Emerg: K.Dawson 42 E.Ford 40 C.Lazzaro 35 L.Young 17
The whole right side of the team named (from Perez down to Phillips) are massive endorsements by the coaching team. Hopefully they take the opportunity to lock down a spot.
 
Didn’t Clarkson say in Inner North that Tucker was being held back one more week i.e could’ve played last week? Where the hell is Corr and why is he always behind?
 
Based on these past few preseason games we should count ourselves lucky that St Kilda decided not to stooge us with Hunter Clark; he's looked absolutely awful to start the year, reckon he might legit be cooked from all his injuries
 
I thought i remembered Bailey's Scott's tackle on Aarts late in last Q big reason we won v Tigers last year, go to Footywire to check his stat's, 26 disposals, 6 marks, a clearance, and a goal, but zero tackles, am i mistaken, or them ?
 
bottom line is i dont rate bailey scott as he is not very talented

he's a sam gibson type
No, the bottom line is that because he isn't a flashy type, you ignore everything else he does. If you don't think Clarko wants a few of the Gibson/Scott (dare I say Zeibell/Turner) types in his side you're delusional.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom