Remove this Banner Ad

Transfer discussion thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter jod23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
You guys spent 200m on lugapoo and pog.
I'd take vvd over them

And like the other Southampton players Liverpool have bought, VVD won’t win anything of note and then he will get disgruntled in 2 years and decide he wants to be sold for £40M. What a way to try to get back to the top, raid Southampton year after year lol.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Welcome to Man City Dejan Lovren :)
Yet a mere hour before this you lauded Lovren as a very good CB when on form as a case to stay as depth. O.o

Btw... he’s crap
 
And like the other Southampton players Liverpool have bought, VVD won’t win anything of note and then he will get disgruntled in 2 years and decide he wants to be sold for £40M. What a way to try to get back to the top, raid Southampton year after year lol.

We are their major sponsor
 
And like the other Southampton players Liverpool have bought, VVD won’t win anything of note and then he will get disgruntled in 2 years and decide he wants to be sold for £40M. What a way to try to get back to the top, raid Southampton year after year lol.

It beats spending 300m in 2 years,
being 15 points behind your local rivals and have your manager still complain about not spending enough.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

VVD obviously a starter in our best 11 but do you think he starts at the other top 6?


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

City & Chelsea were both into him as a starting CB. You would have to say yes. Interesting to see how he goes.

Klopp has got all of his major transfers right so far. Long may it continue.
 
We are their major sponsor

That’s a good way of putting it.

It beats spending 300m in 2 years,
being 15 points behind your local rivals and have your manager still complain about not spending enough.

Yeah, that was a ridiculous thing to say.

About being 15 points behind City. We are not behind them by that amount from a lack of trying or anything. It’s impossible to keep up with any team that starts has 19 wins and 1 draw in the league.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

yeah nah more like 40 - 50 M too much...

Crazy money for just a single defender, who hasn't been great this season either.

Hope he flops tbh.

Under contract until 2021, 26 years old and the most sought after CB in the PL.

Was never going to be less than 50m in today's market. We heard that Salah was overpriced too - hopefully this transfer goes the same way. Klopp has got every major transfer spot on so far.
 
That’s a good way of putting it.



Yeah, that was a ridiculous thing to say.

About being 15 points behind City. We are not behind them by that amount from a lack of trying or anything. It’s impossible to keep up with any team that starts has 19 wins and 1 draw in the league.

I agree Mou saying he hasn't spent enough is ridiculous.
 
If Liverpool were going to spend that kind of money why on earth weren't they in for Davinson Sanchez?

Still, VVD would seem to be what they need so whatever it takes I guess...

Quite simply because for better or worse, Klopp didn't want Sanchez, he wanted Van Dijk.

Klopp and his team have identified their top targets over the last few years and have been reluctant to settle for 2nd/3rd/4th choice, even if that has meant waiting or paying a premium - see Keita, Van Dijk, Salah.
 
Pep loved him, doubt he wanted to buy him as a squad addition.
if pep loved him he'd be at the club. clearly there was a monetary limit on how much he wanted him, and now we'll look at other targets. inigo martinez for example is cheaper and much better with the ball at his feet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom