Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Imagine the commentary going off when a high tackle to a west coast player gets reversed against us cos he is a ducking campaigner.A decision review in the AFL would just turn into a giant cluster fu** because every rule surrounding the most contentious decisions in a match are so open to interpretation. Nothing is completely black and white like in other codes, and more often than not it would just be be one person's opinion over ruling another person's opinion. Far too subjective.
Great idea. It’s so obvious they feel too much pressure in a tight match with little time left. They freeze. Take it out of their hands.Umpires have become so gutless in the last 2 minutes of the game to pay a blatant free yet they ocassionally pull a blue mooner out of their arse in the last 2 minutes.
Its time to give the captains the option to review 1 maybe 2 decisions for each side in the last 2 minutes. If they are correct then like cricket DRS they keep their review.
The major ball sports around the world have introduced video review systems or use a hawkeye type computer generated review.
I dont want reviews all match. The goal review shows how much time is wasted, but the critical last 2 minutes use the video to eliminate the bad errors.
Great idea. It’s so obvious they feel too much pressure in a tight match with little time left. They freeze. Take it out of their hands.
Ah, but apart from the official footage, it seems old Abe Zapruder took his trusty Super8 to the game and catured some additional vision...
Fresh vision ends debate over controversial Crows deliberate non-call
The AFL was in uproar after the umpires appeared to gift the Crows a get-out-of-jail-free card — and now a fresh angle has emerged.
There might be a few apology letters arriving at the AFL umpiring department this week.
Fresh vision of the most controversial call of the weekend has emerged and it lets the whistleblowers off the hook after the dramatic conclusion to the Crows’ thrilling one-point win against the Demons on Saturday evening.
late on Saturday night Fox Sports unearthed a boundary side angle of the decisive moment and it changed everything.
View attachment 1134911
As Murray handballed the ball, Melbourne opponent Charlie Spargo’s hand appeared to come in contact with the ball.
It wasn’t completely obvious and there will be many who will argue there isn’t clear evidence of Spargo’s intervention.
But even the most diehard Demons fans has to concede there’s enough grey area to defend the umpire’s non-decision.
They're incompetent mate. They're actually ruining the product, and they continue to escape criticism.Umpires have become so gutless in the last 2 minutes of the game to pay a blatant free yet they ocassionally pull a blue mooner out of their arse in the last 2 minutes.
Its time to give the captains the option to review 1 maybe 2 decisions for each side in the last 2 minutes. If they are correct then like cricket DRS they keep their review.
The major ball sports around the world have introduced video review systems or use a hawkeye type computer generated review.
I dont want reviews all match. The goal review shows how much time is wasted, but the critical last 2 minutes use the video to eliminate the bad errors.
If it means Dixon can put Flogarty on his ass with no repercussions from the tribunal then I 100% support this idea.have a 2 minute warning bell where rules go out the window for the remainder of the match and it becomes an open slather thunderdome.![]()
Crows supporter ‘journalist’ decides debate is ended in his teams favour"Ends debate".....

It’s corruption, it’s ridiculous it’s never going to change.
“Corrupt” as in “broken”.Being corrupt doesn't just mean you take money for personal gain. It also means debasing something by making errors.
View attachment 1134787
Gambling, viewing figures, multi billion dollar tv deals etc.You'd have to be pretty naive to take notice of how much betting has infiltrated the broadcasts and not think that money plays a huge outcome in the way games are officiated.
Not only this but the AFL is completely revenue driven.
I've said it a few times before, but their number 1 aim is protect the team that brings in more revenue come finals time.
Their second aim is to "even up" contests because blow outs are not a good look for the game. Then they'll pat themselves on the back for how even the competition is.
I always think back to that home game against Hawthorn in 2015 when they hadn't kicked a goal to half time. Start of the third and they get two free kicks in front of goal for no reason that anybody could ever explain.
You'd have to be pretty naive to take notice of how much betting has infiltrated the broadcasts and not think that money plays a huge outcome in the way games are officiated.
Not only this but the AFL is completely revenue driven.
I've said it a few times before, but their number 1 aim is protect the team that brings in more revenue come finals time.
Their second aim is to "even up" contests because blow outs are not a good look for the game. Then they'll pat themselves on the back for how even the competition is.
I always think back to that home game against Hawthorn in 2015 when they hadn't kicked a goal to half time. Start of the third and they get two free kicks in front of goal for no reason that anybody could ever explain.
But incompetence makes corruption way worse.Gambling, viewing figures, multi billion dollar tv deals etc.
There’s nowhere on earth where that much money is involved and there’s no corruption.
The way umpires are bottling it in front of home crowds at crucial moments this year, I'm not sure they would have. Not at AO, anyway.I don't usually like to fall into the "that would've been paid against us for sure" victim mentality, but that would've been paid against us for sure.
But incompetence makes corruption way worse.
Inherent bias or even favouritism would be as close as I'd get to calling the umpires corrupt