thylacine60
Premium Platinum
- Banned
- #976
I didn't realize we were s**t until now, moods - cheers, fella! where the * would we be without your eternal support - did you catch someone smiling tonight, thought you'd drop a reminder of our direness?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, if we lose the club will be under the media spotlight. So what?If Carlton don't beat GCS tomorrow, Port Adelaide, Adelaide and Carlton will be under the media spotlight. All of the excuses the club has made will be put under scrutiny.
Since entering the competition GWS has won 63 games & GCS 44.5 games. Carlton won 59 games since 2011 when GCS entered the competition.
Carltons winning average for the past 8 years has been 7.37.
Since 2001 Carlton has won 135.5 games with an average of 7.5.
Pretty damning stats.
86.32% of all statistics are made up or misrepresented.Lies, damn lies and statistics. 55 years going to games. Can you calculate our winning % please?
Carlton won't win a premiership again in my lifetime.
This one's going to be very unpopular...
Our over-reliance on Cripps is incredibly unhealthy for the long term prospects of this team. With him in the midfield - because why would you play him anywhere else? - SPS, Dow, Kennedy will not become the players they could be, such is the extent to which he's pivotal.
In the past, when you've such dominance in a single member of the side, those sides have indeed been successful but have generally fallen over short of a flag. St Kilda with Riewoldt, Sydney with Franklin, Geelong with Ablett Senior; there are others that can be named. West Coast failed to win a flag with Priddis; North have failed to be exceptional with Cunnington. We've also seen players rise to fill the void, in the event that such a dominant player leaves; Hawthorn became a more balanced attacking side when Franklin left, WC when Mitchell and Priddis retired had their entire midfield step in to compensate for his lack.
We're now getting towards the Unpopular opinion.
I think it might result in a better end (with better development for the young players) if you went for the outrageous trade; offer Cripps to GWS for Coniglio, Hopper/Whitfield and Taranto, or failing that, Coniglio and Greene. Immediately improve our firsts with two mature bodies who can and are capable, so that on the spread we're up.
On one hand, this will never happen; you don't trade away a club captain, and you definitely do not trade away the best player in the comp which is what Cripps shapes as being. But AFL is not a sport dominated by individuals, if anything it is a sport littered with examples of those individuals not being able to elevate their side beyond the dross for very long.
So long as Adelaide gets blamed for the tanking.Edit: maybe instead of trading him, we could just give him 6 weeks off once he's locked away the Brownlow?
So long as Adelaide gets blamed for the tanking.
In the leadup to this season, it's what I was saying we should do. It's point blank unhealthy for us in the short medium and long term to have such an over-reliance on a single player for success, as Dusty actively proves. He was not right in the final last year, and so they got done (hilariously) by Collingwood.Gatorade starting to think you work for the coaching team - terribly complicated way to go about something.
You play your best midfielder in the midfield, your best forward down forward, and your best backman down back. It's simple.
Dusty 2017 had the best year in modern history and Richmond romped to a flag. Sam Mitchell was Hawthorns best midfielder for their 3-peat. Bont was the biggest reason for WB 2016 flag. Although they won a flag after he left, GAJ was on another level from 07-10.
An alternative is to just minimise his minutes in the midfield and putting him down forward for 2 goals a game. Bevo actually did this with Bont last couple of years and he's flying again now.
Don't agree with Dow. He knows how to find the ball. His kicking has become appalling. Not the same kid I saw in his first practice match against the cheats, where he faultless. I would put him in the VFL and make him get it right. He will be part of the team long term.This one's going to be very unpopular...
Our over-reliance on Cripps is incredibly unhealthy for the long term prospects of this team. With him in the midfield - because why would you play him anywhere else? - SPS, Dow, Kennedy will not become the players they could be, such is the extent to which he's pivotal.
In the past, when you've such dominance in a single member of the side, those sides have indeed been successful but have generally fallen over short of a flag. St Kilda with Riewoldt, Sydney with Franklin, Geelong with Ablett Senior; there are others that can be named. West Coast failed to win a flag with Priddis; North have failed to be exceptional with Cunnington. We've also seen players rise to fill the void, in the event that such a dominant player leaves; Hawthorn became a more balanced attacking side when Franklin left, WC when Mitchell and Priddis retired had their entire midfield step in to compensate for his lack.
We're now getting towards the Unpopular opinion.
I think it might result in a better end (with better development for the young players) if you went for the outrageous trade; offer Cripps to GWS for Coniglio, Hopper/Whitfield and Taranto, or failing that, Coniglio and Greene. Immediately improve our firsts with two mature bodies who can and are capable, so that on the spread we're up.
On one hand, this will never happen; you don't trade away a club captain, and you definitely do not trade away the best player in the comp which is what Cripps shapes as being. But AFL is not a sport dominated by individuals, if anything it is a sport littered with examples of those individuals not being able to elevate their side beyond the dross for very long.
This one's going to be very unpopular...
Our over-reliance on Cripps is incredibly unhealthy for the long term prospects of this team. With him in the midfield - because why would you play him anywhere else? - SPS, Dow, Kennedy will not become the players they could be, such is the extent to which he's pivotal.
In the past, when you've such dominance in a single member of the side, those sides have indeed been successful but have generally fallen over short of a flag. St Kilda with Riewoldt, Sydney with Franklin, Geelong with Ablett Senior; there are others that can be named. West Coast failed to win a flag with Priddis; North have failed to be exceptional with Cunnington. We've also seen players rise to fill the void, in the event that such a dominant player leaves; Hawthorn became a more balanced attacking side when Franklin left, WC when Mitchell and Priddis retired had their entire midfield step in to compensate for his lack.
We're now getting towards the Unpopular opinion.
I think it might result in a better end (with better development for the young players) if you went for the outrageous trade; offer Cripps to GWS for Coniglio, Hopper/Whitfield and Taranto, or failing that, Coniglio and Greene. Immediately improve our firsts with two mature bodies who can and are capable, so that on the spread we're up.
On one hand, this will never happen; you don't trade away a club captain, and you definitely do not trade away the best player in the comp which is what Cripps shapes as being. But AFL is not a sport dominated by individuals, if anything it is a sport littered with examples of those individuals not being able to elevate their side beyond the dross for very long.
Outside Amos (back 6 line coach) and Teague if I was an assisstant coach I would be very worried about my performance.
Barker needs to go mainly.
We may not be in a position to chose if WE want to trade him.
Remember, he is from WA, his better half is from WA, now with him in Melbourne but we all know how these things pan out when both are from the same state, don't we!
How do you figure, when it's the forwardline that isn't functioning?
Unpopular opinions?
We need more speed and forward crumbers and goal-kickers.