Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would also make a Euopean Super league more likely.Makes the off season much longer if your club doesn't play in Europe.
Attendances would also go down for mid table clubs that are playing far more mid week games. .
What if international breaks were lumped into the end of the season? You could put weekend games into those empty slots.Makes the off season much longer if your club doesn't play in Europe.
Attendances would also go down for mid table clubs that are playing far more mid week games. .
What I like about it is that the team that made it to the Champions League would be the one playing in it.Interesting idea I reckon. Not a bad one.
Like a giant european finals series at the end of the domestic league seasonWhat I like about it is that the team that made it to the Champions League would be the one playing in it.
LONDON — Representatives of seven of the world’s richest soccer teams, including Manchester United, Barcelona and Real Madrid, visited FIFA on Wednesday for a private meeting aimed at winning the clubs in the increasingly fractious battle to set up a new multibillion-dollar world club championship.
The group also included the English champion Manchester City, Italy’s Juventus, France’s Paris Saint-Germain and the perennial German champion Bayern Munich.
The seven clubs invited to the meeting had combined revenues of more than $4 billion in 2017, and they command a massive global fan base that would be critical to making FIFA’s secretive discussions about the new tournament, code-named “Project Trophy,” a success.
They met one day after the president of UEFA, Aleksander Ceferin, wrote to FIFA’s president, Gianni Infantino, questioning the wisdom of selling an expanded version of FIFA’s annual Club World Cup to a consortium led by Japan’s SoftBank, which runs the world’s largest technology investment fund. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are among the fund’s biggest backers.
That would be interesting. Particularly if it's a CB at a corner or something haha.For penalty kicks the person who was fouled should be the one who has to take the penalty kick.
Why 3 mins? Seems an arbitrary number.Players who go down and force the ball to be kicked out so they can receive attention should be forced to stay off for 3 mins. Would cut out the fake stuff if they knew their side was down to 10 men for that long
I reckon 5 mins might be too steep and 2 mins not enough.Why 3 mins? Seems an arbitrary number.
I'd prefer they have to wait for a stoppage. Currently they can run back on whenever can't they?I reckon 5 mins might be too steep and 2 mins not enough.
Yeah the ref lets them back on when he gets a chance. Nah next stoppage would be no penalty. The team with someone off would just put the ball back outI'd prefer they have to wait for a stoppage. Currently they can run back on whenever can't they?
That's their prerogative. I don't see how picking a random number out would serve the game any better.Yeah the ref lets them back on when he gets a chance. Nah next stoppage would be no penalty. The team with someone off would just put the ball back out
The point of it is to stamp out fake injuries. Letting teams put the ball out a 2nd time to let someone on doesn't help. Would be good to disadvantage the side with the player off because it'll just be real injuries where players stay down needing treatmentThat's their prerogative. I don't see how picking a random number out would serve the game any better.
the retrospective ban is already in and i'm all forDon't think it's unpopular, but if you're found diving - in game or retrospectively - it should be a red with a three game ban.
How often has a fake injury genuinely worked for any team? Honestly don't think it's even worth worrying about.The point of it is to stamp out fake injuries. Letting teams put the ball out a 2nd time to let someone on doesn't help. Would be good to disadvantage the side with the player off because it'll just be real injuries where players stay down needing treatment
It works every time the team with the ball puts the ball out for "fair" play when the injury isn't genuineHow often has a fake injury genuinely worked for any team? Honestly don't think it's even worth worrying about.