- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
- Posts
- 4,272
- Reaction score
- 1,812
- Location
- Perth
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- East Perth
The 2000 - present colour-pallete mismash
Vote which logo is best
- Thread starter Smeagle
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2011
- Posts
- 11,899
- Reaction score
- 12,919
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2007
- Posts
- 1,932
- Reaction score
- 327
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Subiaco — West Ham
- Thread starter
- #54
Five and a half years on...
The Original Eagles logo is so well designed. It's so simple but so effective, and most importantly, ties in perfectly with arguably the biggest piece of continual WCE brand equity, the wings.
The 2000 Eagles head was never designed to fit in with the wings, structurally it is so incongruous that it has pushed them up and up to the little chicken wings we are stuck with now. It's a really ordinary, out-of-date logo, which stinks of ochre.
I don't know if it's the faux-retro movement, but Dynamo is actually making a little comeback in the world of design. It's actually not a bad-looking typeface, and I honestly cannot picture any other paired with the original head.
It's the Hartford Whalers logo of the AFL - distinctive, bold, symbolic and bloody timeless. I've mulled over this, and I can't possibly make it any better than it actually is. My dream Eagles kit is gold and royal wings jumpers with this beautiful thing sitting on its own (no wordmark), larger than it was in the 90s, right on the guts where it was made to be.
Shield or not, this classic contemporary piece of Australian graphic design needs to be returned. Permanently.
The Original Eagles logo is so well designed. It's so simple but so effective, and most importantly, ties in perfectly with arguably the biggest piece of continual WCE brand equity, the wings.
The 2000 Eagles head was never designed to fit in with the wings, structurally it is so incongruous that it has pushed them up and up to the little chicken wings we are stuck with now. It's a really ordinary, out-of-date logo, which stinks of ochre.
I don't know if it's the faux-retro movement, but Dynamo is actually making a little comeback in the world of design. It's actually not a bad-looking typeface, and I honestly cannot picture any other paired with the original head.
It's the Hartford Whalers logo of the AFL - distinctive, bold, symbolic and bloody timeless. I've mulled over this, and I can't possibly make it any better than it actually is. My dream Eagles kit is gold and royal wings jumpers with this beautiful thing sitting on its own (no wordmark), larger than it was in the 90s, right on the guts where it was made to be.
Shield or not, this classic contemporary piece of Australian graphic design needs to be returned. Permanently.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2011
- Posts
- 11,899
- Reaction score
- 12,919
- AFL Club
- West Coast
The Shield to me, minus the VFL logo.
QS
Brownlow Medallist
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2009
- Posts
- 23,119
- Reaction score
- 15,226
- Location
- between the big sticks
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2011
- Posts
- 11,899
- Reaction score
- 12,919
- AFL Club
- West Coast
maybe it does then because I guess we have only been rewarding effort in the midfield......
lmach
Naitanui2Yeo
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2010
- Posts
- 21,546
- Reaction score
- 32,373
- Location
- QLD via Perth
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Because that's relevant.
Now that's terrible.The OG East Perth Coat of Arms is so good!
Last edited:
