Conspiracy Theory VOTER FRAUD COMPILATION. CRIME OF THE CENTURY! * Debunked

Remove this Banner Ad

Oh brother. 2 blokes in Australia with excel sheets, well sh*t I'm convinced :tearsofjoy:

I quote - "You got to be a very special kind of stupid".

That was so hilariously representative of the low level thinking of Trumpies. Pretending to introduce some scientific rigour into the argument and failing miserably due to the lack of anything more than a superficial understanding.
 
LOL, this is very amusing.

So, your sophisticated Excel model indicated "no scenario where the result flips - zero" but almost immediately after that, it actually did happen. Oops, that would be a non-zero chance, wouldn't it? So, yours was not a very powerful predictive model, was it? I mean, any normal model would assign non-zero probabilities to numerous scenarios, no matter how implausible. Your model assigned a zero probability to a medium to high probability event. Just LOL.

Clearly you forgot to take into account the timing differences associated with postal votes v physical votes. Probably not your only error.

Just wondering, why didn't you bet like your mate did, if it was so obvious the "fix was in"?

And you still haven't responded to me pointing out that the stats you quoted in your earlier post have been discredited.

Every man and his dog talked about this for months leading up to the election - that mail-ins would be counted last in a bunch of states including swing ones and that they were likely to be overwhelmingly democrat. Trump primed his base with the narrative that this occurring = fraud, for the best part of 10 months.

Yebs and his mate on excel: zero probability :drunk:
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Trump primed his base with the narrative that this occurring = fraud, for the best part of 10 months.
Not only did he gaslight the bejesus out of these poor saps, he wasn’t even exactly hiding the fact that he intended to declare victory on election night, whether it was warranted or not. And the dutiful little Trumpkins just lined up and nodded their heads. How dumb do you have to be...

 
Creative destruction media isn’t any better
So go straight to the local papers interviewing Fulton County Election Officials since Democrat propaganda outlets like CNN, MSBNC, NBC, NYT or WaPo won't cover it.


Analysis of drop box ballot transfer forms for absentee ballots deposited in drop boxes provided by Fulton County in response to an Open Records Request showed that 385 transfer forms out of an estimated 1,565 transfer forms Fulton County said should have been provided are missing.

This is the first time that any election official at either the state or county level from a key battleground state has made an admission of significant error in election procedures for the November 3, 2020 election.

The admission of missing chain of custody documents by a Fulton County official is important for several reasons that cut to the very core of public confidence in the outcome of the 2020 presidential election:


  • President Biden was certified as the winner of Georgia’s 16 Electoral College votes in the 2020 election by the narrow margin of less than 12,000 votes over former President Donald Trump out of a total of 5 million votes cast statewide.
  • The total number of absentee ballots whose chain of custody was purportedly documented in these 385 missing Fulton County absentee ballot transfer forms was 18,901.
Just as well someone keeps spreadsheets. Links in the Georgia Star News.
1623794167272.png
 
So go straight to the local papers interviewing Fulton County Election Officials since Democrat propaganda outlets like CNN, MSBNC, NBC, NYT or WaPo won't cover it.


Analysis of drop box ballot transfer forms for absentee ballots deposited in drop boxes provided by Fulton County in response to an Open Records Request showed that 385 transfer forms out of an estimated 1,565 transfer forms Fulton County said should have been provided are missing.

This is the first time that any election official at either the state or county level from a key battleground state has made an admission of significant error in election procedures for the November 3, 2020 election.

The admission of missing chain of custody documents by a Fulton County official is important for several reasons that cut to the very core of public confidence in the outcome of the 2020 presidential election:


  • President Biden was certified as the winner of Georgia’s 16 Electoral College votes in the 2020 election by the narrow margin of less than 12,000 votes over former President Donald Trump out of a total of 5 million votes cast statewide.
  • The total number of absentee ballots whose chain of custody was purportedly documented in these 385 missing Fulton County absentee ballot transfer forms was 18,901.
Just as well someone keeps spreadsheets. Links in the Georgia Star News.
View attachment 1156245

Go collect your million!
 
So go straight to the local papers interviewing Fulton County Election Officials since Democrat propaganda outlets like CNN, MSBNC, NBC, NYT or WaPo won't cover it.


Analysis of drop box ballot transfer forms for absentee ballots deposited in drop boxes provided by Fulton County in response to an Open Records Request showed that 385 transfer forms out of an estimated 1,565 transfer forms Fulton County said should have been provided are missing.

This is the first time that any election official at either the state or county level from a key battleground state has made an admission of significant error in election procedures for the November 3, 2020 election.

The admission of missing chain of custody documents by a Fulton County official is important for several reasons that cut to the very core of public confidence in the outcome of the 2020 presidential election:


  • President Biden was certified as the winner of Georgia’s 16 Electoral College votes in the 2020 election by the narrow margin of less than 12,000 votes over former President Donald Trump out of a total of 5 million votes cast statewide.
  • The total number of absentee ballots whose chain of custody was purportedly documented in these 385 missing Fulton County absentee ballot transfer forms was 18,901.
Just as well someone keeps spreadsheets. Links in the Georgia Star News.
View attachment 1156245

I've asked you this before when you mentioned this chain of custody doc stuff - how do these percentages stack up to previous elections? Are they typically at much higher percentages?
 
So go straight to the local papers interviewing Fulton County Election Officials since Democrat propaganda outlets like CNN, MSBNC, NBC, NYT or WaPo won't cover it.


Analysis of drop box ballot transfer forms for absentee ballots deposited in drop boxes provided by Fulton County in response to an Open Records Request showed that 385 transfer forms out of an estimated 1,565 transfer forms Fulton County said should have been provided are missing.

This is the first time that any election official at either the state or county level from a key battleground state has made an admission of significant error in election procedures for the November 3, 2020 election.

The admission of missing chain of custody documents by a Fulton County official is important for several reasons that cut to the very core of public confidence in the outcome of the 2020 presidential election:


  • President Biden was certified as the winner of Georgia’s 16 Electoral College votes in the 2020 election by the narrow margin of less than 12,000 votes over former President Donald Trump out of a total of 5 million votes cast statewide.
  • The total number of absentee ballots whose chain of custody was purportedly documented in these 385 missing Fulton County absentee ballot transfer forms was 18,901.
Just as well someone keeps spreadsheets. Links in the Georgia Star News.
View attachment 1156245

What you gonna spend the million dollars on?
 
I've asked you this before when you mentioned this chain of custody doc stuff - how do these percentages stack up to previous elections? Are they typically at much higher percentages?
Chain of custody was part of another ongoing lawsuit and it's breaking federal law not to keep for every vote for 22 months after an election. Should be 100% or it can't be counted or certified if it was. 18,000 is well over the winner margin.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

What you gonna spend the million dollars on?
You're obsessed. That's basic administration. But you keep on attacking anyone that points that out or the obvious fraud in a few key Counties. $100 million contract went to Dominion just before the election in Georgia, even though other States banned them, and you've naïve to think none of that got kicked back.

If I remember correctly two of the Fulton County adjudicators initially refused to certify Fulton County votes, then they were publically identified with their kid's schools named. So they changed their recommendation under pressure.
 
Last edited:
Chain of custody was part of another ongoing lawsuit and it's breaking federal law not to keep for every vote for 22 months after an election. Should be 100% or it can't be counted or certified if it was. 18,000 is well over the winner margin.

Should be, but is it? (for prior elections)

If no one has bothered to check until now, thats fine. But it's another example of something being thrown up which, yes, is a problem or breach of law, but isn't actual evidence of fraud.
 
You're obsessed. That's basic administration. But you keep on attacking anyone that points that out or the obvious fraud in a few key Counties. $100 million contract went to Dominion just before the election in Georgia, even though other States banned them, and you've naïve to think none of that got kicked back.

And the states using Dominion machines where Trump won? No issues there I assume?

Who has 'banned' them (not sure opting not to use them = banned lol) - Texas and a handful of others?

If I remember correctly two of the Fulton County adjudicators initially refused to certify Fulton County votes, then they were publically identified with their kid's schools named. So they changed their recommendation under pressure.
Yep, after a junket to DC and a night on the piss at a Trump hotel, for which they were roundly condemned.

Which isn't to excuse the naming stuff btw, but you can't have a problem with one and not the other.
 
Last edited:
You're obsessed. That's basic administration. But you keep on attacking anyone that points that out or the obvious fraud in a few key Counties. $100 million contract went to Dominion just before the election in Georgia, even though other States banned them, and you've naïve to think none of that got kicked back.

If I remember correctly two of the Fulton County adjudicators initially refused to certify Fulton County votes, then they were publically identified with their kid's schools named. So they changed their recommendation under pressure.

 
Should be, but is it? (for prior elections)

If no one has bothered to check until now, thats fine. But it's another example of something being thrown up which, yes, is a problem or breach of law, but isn't actual evidence of fraud.
That's what they're supposed to check before certifying. Yes it is election fraud and yes it is breaking Federal law.
 

by Bernard B. Kerik was the 40th Police Commissioner of the New York City Police Department

The Arizona audit is being run impeccably, utilizing security and surveillance procedures with a longstanding track record of effectiveness.

To say that I was impressed after viewing the audit process for myself would be a massive understatement. I’ve spent decades working in security and law enforcement at the highest levels, and this is exactly the level of conscientiousness and attention to detail that I would demand for a sensitive or high-profile investigation.

On the coliseum floor, the audit is conducted in several stages, each of which takes place in a designated area. The tables in each section are color-coded, and workers wear shirts with corresponding colors, making it easy for anyone to spot if someone strays from their assigned area.

At every table, there is accountability and supervision, all of it live streamed and viewable by the general public.

There is an audit supervisor responsible for groups of two to three tables. If any problems arise or anything appears to be even slightly amiss, the supervisor immediately steps in to address it.

And just as casinos use high-resolution cameras in the ceiling to monitor every single table, the auditors in Arizona labor under the scrutiny of state-of-the-art cameras positioned directly above each table.

Every ballot reviewed by the auditors goes through distinct stages, starting with a simple count. One by one, ballots are placed on rotating stands in the middle of each table, and each one is viewed and counted by three separate people, whose independent tallies must line up. Each batch has 50 ballots, and once all of them are counted they’re boxed, sealed, and marked with the name of each counter, much like an evidence label.

The box is then taken to a locked cage until it is ready for review at the next station.

Next, the ballots undergo digital imagery examination, which is done at such a high resolution that it’s almost better than reviewing the ballot itself, because you can zoom in without losing resolution.

After being imaged, the ballots are re-boxed, a new tabulations page is attached, and the box is sent to a different cage. From that point on, the ballots are kept under lock and key, with 24/7 video surveillance.

If every state performed an audit like this one after every election, public faith in our democracy would be absolute and unshakable.

The audit process being used in Arizona has accuracy, integrity, and accountability, and there’s no way to cheat because everything is captured on film.
 
That's what they're supposed to check before certifying. Yes it is election fraud and yes it is breaking Federal law.

See, this is where you regularly come unstuck. Honestly, its pretty simple - its a breach of law, but it's not election fraud. The lack of documentation on the ballot handling doesn't prove that anything was tampered with - this is why I asked you about prior elections (I've looked myself but haven't been able to find anything). With the US system the way it is, I imagine there are a literal mountain of T's not crossed and I's not dotted every election.

Another example of this erroneous leap in logic is the Dominion voting machines - they're not secure, they can connect to the internet, hacked remotely etc. Great, should be fixed - can you show us anything to prove that something like that did occur in this instance?

Like I said to Yebs a few pages back, you essentially want to overturn a democratic election on a hunch, an allegation, an accusation, without satisfying the required burden of proof that we as a functioning society have agreed to accept. Its ludicrous :drunk:
 

by Bernard B. Kerik was the 40th Police Commissioner of the New York City Police Department

The Arizona audit is being run impeccably, utilizing security and surveillance procedures with a longstanding track record of effectiveness.

To say that I was impressed after viewing the audit process for myself would be a massive understatement. I’ve spent decades working in security and law enforcement at the highest levels, and this is exactly the level of conscientiousness and attention to detail that I would demand for a sensitive or high-profile investigation.

On the coliseum floor, the audit is conducted in several stages, each of which takes place in a designated area. The tables in each section are color-coded, and workers wear shirts with corresponding colors, making it easy for anyone to spot if someone strays from their assigned area.

At every table, there is accountability and supervision, all of it live streamed and viewable by the general public.

There is an audit supervisor responsible for groups of two to three tables. If any problems arise or anything appears to be even slightly amiss, the supervisor immediately steps in to address it.

And just as casinos use high-resolution cameras in the ceiling to monitor every single table, the auditors in Arizona labor under the scrutiny of state-of-the-art cameras positioned directly above each table.

Every ballot reviewed by the auditors goes through distinct stages, starting with a simple count. One by one, ballots are placed on rotating stands in the middle of each table, and each one is viewed and counted by three separate people, whose independent tallies must line up. Each batch has 50 ballots, and once all of them are counted they’re boxed, sealed, and marked with the name of each counter, much like an evidence label.

The box is then taken to a locked cage until it is ready for review at the next station.

Next, the ballots undergo digital imagery examination, which is done at such a high resolution that it’s almost better than reviewing the ballot itself, because you can zoom in without losing resolution.

After being imaged, the ballots are re-boxed, a new tabulations page is attached, and the box is sent to a different cage. From that point on, the ballots are kept under lock and key, with 24/7 video surveillance.

If every state performed an audit like this one after every election, public faith in our democracy would be absolute and unshakable.

The audit process being used in Arizona has accuracy, integrity, and accountability, and there’s no way to cheat because everything is captured on film.

200w.gif


lol

Quick, we need to push back on Republicans calling out the audit for the sham it is.


 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top