Viceregal
Norm Smith Medallist
Nah I can spot a re-rail opportunity thread...
![]()
Is that the going to the hospital after getting beaten up or what happens after they discharge you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

AFLW Logo
The livestream will be available on womens.afl & the AFLW app. Join our live chat!
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Nah I can spot a re-rail opportunity thread...
![]()
Shakes head, either/both... that was the magical mystery tour of the late 60's/70's, kids these days - wasted potential.Is that the going to the hospital after getting beaten up or what happens after they discharge you?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I'm not convinced. I haven't seen any evidence (and we never will) that his "failure" was due only to a lack of application.Jared Brennan by a mile, could have been an AFL legend if he had a bigger drive, talent to burn. Those one handed tricks will remain in my memory forever.
It's hard to know, really. I will say this though- he's one of the few players we seen in recent times who could genuinely play every position on the ground effectively.I'm not convinced. I haven't seen any evidence (and we never will) that his "failure" was due only to a lack of application.
Certainly, I think he could have been better and lasted longer, but how much better or more consistent, will remain a mystery. I think it is likely that his "flashes of brilliance" were exactly that, moments when an ordinary player managed to pluck something special/exciting out of his arse.
What I mean is, were those times when he excitingly picked the ball up with one hand, dodge an opponent only to kick off the side of his boot out on the full, really a result of laziness, or did we actually see his best? I think we might have actually seen his best, where he could do some freaky stuff, but wasn't able to do it often or consistently enough.
*At times. Could also be a liability.It's hard to know, really. I will say this though- he's one of the few players we seen in recent times who could genuinely play every position on the ground effectively.
Think there's enough evidence to suggest he didn't have the desire or application needed to go to the next level. Retiring fairly young supports that notion.I'm not convinced. I haven't seen any evidence (and we never will) that his "failure" was due only to a lack of application.
Certainly, I think he could have been better and lasted longer, but how much better or more consistent, will remain a mystery. I think it is likely that his "flashes of brilliance" were exactly that, moments when an ordinary player managed to pluck something special/exciting out of his arse.
What I mean is, were those times when he excitingly picked the ball up with one hand, dodge an opponent only to kick off the side of his boot out on the full, really a result of laziness, or did we actually see his best? I think we might have actually seen his best, where he could do some freaky stuff, but wasn't able to do it often or consistently enough.
inside information that i will not expand on, leigh matthews comment on rhan is spot on.One player that hasn't been mentioned yet - Rhan Hooper.
At his best he was kind of like Cyril Rioli. I think Leigh mentioned him in his wasted talent in his book, including that he begun to hang around some bad influences i think.
In 2008 he played 20 games averaging 10 disposals 1 goal and 4.5 tackles per game in the forward line. Some of his 9 games in 2009 were fantastic. Something must have happened off field / fitness wise to trade him to Hawthorn where he only played 6 more games in 2010 for a total of 54.
One player that hasn't been mentioned yet - Rhan Hooper.
At his best he was kind of like Cyril Rioli. I think Leigh mentioned him in his wasted talent in his book, including that he begun to hang around some bad influences I think.
In 2008 he played 20 games averaging 10 disposals 1 goal and 4.5 tackles per game in the forward line. Some of his 9 games in 2009 were fantastic. Something must have happened off field / fitness wise to trade him to Hawthorn where he only played 6 more games in 2010 for a total of 54.
Karnezis was certainly a talent.
I'd say his most impressive skill was his ability to blind people to his significant deficiencies and make them defend him rabidly without any semblance of objectivity and excuse and blameshift his non-performance onto everyone but himself. It followed him to Collingwood too from what I saw.
Should have stuck with cricket didn't have the appetite for the fitness work required at AFL levelDamian Cupido?
Fev would be one of the league's greatest wasted talents.
I think using the term great is ver reaching, Jed was a good player but honestly probably made the most of his career based on his talent level.Was Jed Adcock played out of position? I'd say yes , would have made a great half forward flanker. Who else are we mucking about with? Hanley is one that comes to mind.
Have to agree, in his first season I reslly rated Karnezis. He could find space and read the flight so well. I had hopes of him being the poor mans Fyfe just a shame he had no heart.Karnezis was a waste of talent IMO. Once Voss got wind that he was looking to leave he didn't play him which was understandable. Karnezis was just never made for AFL footy being mentally soft and not willing to work hard enough which was also a problem at Collingwood. Could have been a great wing/HFF IMO he just had something about him.