In his second coming to the test team, Johnson is averaging 26 with the bat. He's going to be missed at 8 when he goes, but he's not an all-rounder. Neither is Watson.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
This comment explains things even more............
Excellent, especially the title of Ray Bright's book.
It was funny watching you grandstanding about him scoring zero f-c centuries when you were wrong, that's all.![]()
It was funny watching you grandstanding about him scoring zero f-c centuries when you were wrong, that's all.![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Its not based off this Test, it is based off three years.If he doesnt perform next test I dont give a shit if we won. Go ahead and drop him but based off this test you cannot drop him before voges or clarke.
Zampa, Boyce, Lynn, Silk.Is there any Australian player you actually rate or like??![]()
Zampa, Boyce, Lynn, Silk.
All nowhere near test selection mind you.
I don't see how we can fit Mitch Marsh into this side then either.People need to stop talking about Faulkner. We're not a good enough team to bat a keeper at 6, and that's all there really is to it.
I don't see how we can fit Mitch Marsh into this side then either.
I don't view him as good enough to hold down a top 6 batting position.
And Haddin certainly can't (to accommodate Marsh at 7).
Why the fixation with an all-rounder at 6?Marsh does average over 60 since the last Ashes.
Of all the allrounders (bar Maxwell) he's the best bat
Why the fixation with an all-rounder at 6?
Why the fixation with an all-rounder at 6?
So Geoff Marsh was just spotted leaving Perth on a London-bound flight (source: Tim Gossage's twitter). Doesn't look good for Robot.
Zampa, Boyce, Lynn, Silk.
All nowhere near test selection mind you.
I don't see how we can fit Mitch Marsh into this side then either.
I don't view him as good enough to hold down a top 6 batting position.
And Haddin certainly can't (to accommodate Marsh at 7).
WarnerAsk the selectors. Not me.
Personally I wouldn't be amazed if they drop Voges for Mitch Marsh because we need an extra bowling option because Johnson and Starc went at 4.5 an over
does anyone else have a feeling NO changes will be made?