Remove this Banner Ad

Strategy What to do with pick 1 now we’ve got it - Do We Need Reid or is it Curtins

Keep pick 1, or trade it?


  • Total voters
    397
  • Poll closed .

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've had enough of all of these kents already.

Nothing would satisfy me more right now than drafting H.Reid and watch him kick a bag against the tin-rattlers.


And anyone else wanting to entertain splitting the pick in this massively compromised draft needs to give themselves an uppercut as well.
 
No he meant Tony

marilyn monroe vintage GIF by FilmStruck
Not with Jamie looking like that he didn’t…
 
Why not all 3?

Then with our draft hand we can tell the other clubs to Reid all about it

It's bad enough yelling out for Williams to win the ruck. Then at the next centre bounce correctly yelling "Go Williams" and it is a different person.

Not to mention (when not seeing the numbers & at a distance) seeing Allen, Maric and B.Williams near the ball & getting them mixed up.
 
Last edited:
Didn't Rohan come out and say there will need to be a couple picks in top 10 & even then....

I saw someone mention something about Melbourne getting hold of NM's #3 (on McKay's departure) & adding that to Freo's 1st pick they hold. So #3 & #6 would be a starting point I'd imagine.

Who the **** is Rohan?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

FWIW I reckon the AFL will push privately for a deal where you guys get 2 & 3 and North end up with 1 & 8.

You guys can get Curtin & choice of McKercher/Duursma.

North get Reid and academy approval to select Sanders at 8.

If I’m reading the tea leaves correctly I reckon this will be the ‘massaged’ outcome.

Happy? No good? Interested to hear WC thoughts.
 
FWIW I reckon the AFL will push privately for a deal where you guys get 2 & 3 and North end up with 1 & 8.

You guys can get Curtin & choice of McKercher/Duursma.

North get Reid and academy approval to select Sanders at 8.

If I’m reading the tea leaves correctly I reckon this will be the ‘massaged’ outcome.

Happy? No good? Interested to hear WC thoughts.
The only way I would consider giving up Reid is to get Curtin and another top 5 pick so this would work for me. Curtin & McKercher would be an amazing outcome imo.
 
FWIW I reckon the AFL will push privately for a deal where you guys get 2 & 3 and North end up with 1 & 8.

You guys can get Curtin & choice of McKercher/Duursma.

North get Reid and academy approval to select Sanders at 8.

If I’m reading the tea leaves correctly I reckon this will be the ‘massaged’ outcome.

Happy? No good? Interested to hear WC thoughts.
The AFL should have absolutely no say in it. Why is everyone on the east coast offended by us drafting the best available talent in the draft when we have pick 1?
 
FWIW I reckon the AFL will push privately for a deal where you guys get 2 & 3 and North end up with 1 & 8.

You guys can get Curtin & choice of McKercher/Duursma.

North get Reid and academy approval to select Sanders at 8.

If I’m reading the tea leaves correctly I reckon this will be the ‘massaged’ outcome.

Happy? No good? Interested to hear WC thoughts.
I’d still prefer Reid tbh but I could understand if others were happy with the trade.


Not going to happen though. Zero chance the AFL hand North both Band 1 and access to Sanders.

They weren’t even the worst performed club this year. It would sure as hell open the door for WC to request assistance next year if another bottom two finish occurs.
 
FWIW I reckon the AFL will push privately for a deal where you guys get 2 & 3 and North end up with 1 & 8.

You guys can get Curtin & choice of McKercher/Duursma.

North get Reid and academy approval to select Sanders at 8.

If I’m reading the tea leaves correctly I reckon this will be the ‘massaged’ outcome.

Happy? No good? Interested to hear WC thoughts.
Wouldn't it be great to get rid of these stupid massaged outcomes. We don't need it. We got pick 1 because we had a terrible year so let's just take the best player and be done with it.
 
FWIW I reckon the AFL will push privately for a deal where you guys get 2 & 3 and North end up with 1 & 8.

You guys can get Curtin & choice of McKercher/Duursma.

North get Reid and academy approval to select Sanders at 8.

If I’m reading the tea leaves correctly I reckon this will be the ‘massaged’ outcome.

Happy? No good? Interested to hear WC thoughts.
Would be mad to turn down 2 and 3.

Do also have the gut feel that the AFL will try to push their way in and get involved behind the scenes. There’ll be all sort of pressure from the media and broadcasters not to lose the best Victorian prospect in years, and money talks unfortunately.

2+3 would be more than enough but I still hope we tell them to stick it.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Wouldn't it be great to get rid of these stupid massaged outcomes. We don't need it. We got pick 1 because we had a terrible year so let's just take the best player and be done with it.
It'd be great....but while they're giving them out we should just take advantage while we can. Just about every other team in the league gets their fair share of handouts from the AFL one way or another
 
I still prefer 2x top ten picks one of them needs to be the top three pick to land one of Curtin/ McKercher.

Which leaves just North and Hawthorn. Melbourne would need to include pick 15 to make it worth dropping out of that top echelon of players.








Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
 
It'd be great....but while they're giving them out we should just take advantage while we can. Just about every other team in the league gets their fair share of handouts from the AFL one way or another
We take Reid this year then finish bottom two next year and apply for a PP and get 1+2 or 2+3 just to really shit the vics off.
 
It'd be great....but while they're giving them out we should just take advantage while we can. Just about every other team in the league gets their fair share of handouts from the AFL one way or another

Our injury list has given us top 2 picks 2 years in a row. That's enough of a leg up for me.

Plus you know if we get this stupid massaged outcome and use one of the picks on Mckercher, the AFL will massage it so he goes to Tassie for not much in a few years.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Why would AFL push privately for a deal? It is not like we have to trade pick 1 whether or not it is in our best interests to do so.

They will want both clubs to get back on track and competitive as quickly as possible. The draft is their primary mechanism to achieve this.

Picks 2 & 3 for Reid now is MUCH more preferable for all concerned than another Jason Horne-Francis scenario developing.
 
FWIW I reckon the AFL will push privately for a deal where you guys get 2 & 3 and North end up with 1 & 8.

You guys can get Curtin & choice of McKercher/Duursma.

North get Reid and academy approval to select Sanders at 8.

If I’m reading the tea leaves correctly I reckon this will be the ‘massaged’ outcome.

Happy? No good? Interested to hear WC thoughts.
Why would the AFL care who goes where?
 
Why would the AFL care who goes where?

It’s less about who goes where than the AFL will want both clubs to receive TWO very early first round picks without ever having to use the dirty words “priority pick”.

The deal I mentioned is the best way of achieving that, whilst satisfying both parties.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top