Which Sinclair camp are you in?

[2006_Eagles]

Lets get a quick gauge on the board of where everyone sits.

 

[royalsfan]

Trade. Lycett is better

 

[Marlin01]

Where's the option for "Don't trade: we need 3 ruckmen on our list"

 

[2006_Eagles]

Where's the option for "Don't trade: we need 3 ruckmen on our list"

I only make the options

Sorry bru

 

[2006_Eagles]

Where's the option for "Don't trade: we need 3 ruckmen on our list"

This falls under the Don't Trade option so you are still well represented

 

[boondy]

too hard basket for me happy iether way it goes , for him to have come off the rookie list to where he is now , 1 bad game he had happened to be the GF but he wasnt the only one .

 

[Suma Magic]

Option x: trade for a good deal.

If we could turn Sinclair and 36/37/55 for Jetta and 14, we'd be crazy not to.

 

[Godfather32]

Where's the option for "Don't trade: we need 3 ruckmen on our list"

Having 3 ruckmen and trading Sinclair aren't necessarily mutually exclusive

 

[FatPizza]

I'm in the 'In reality I know ****-all about the inner-workings of football, so I'll leave it to the experts' camp.

 

[2006_Eagles]

I'm in the 'In reality I know ****-all about the inner-workings of football, so I'll leave it to the experts' camp.

That's half the fun, trying to get inside the minds of those in the inner sanctum.

 

[Godfather32]

That's half the fun, trying to get inside the minds of those in the inner sanctum.

 

[Illeagle]

I would like to keep him, but hawks want an early second round pick for Anderson. If somehow we could get Jetta and a pick for Anderson, then i reckon we'd be crazy not to.

 

[2006_Eagles]

I would like to keep him, but hawks want an early second round pick for Anderson. If somehow we could get Jetta and a pick for Anderson, then i reckon we'd be crazy not to.

That's probably the thinking.

 

[Ok Boomer]

Trade if we get a great return.

 

[2006_Eagles]

Trade if we get a great return.

What if its not great but adequate?

 

[wraglesweb]

I don't mind trading Sinclair but just not for Jetta...Something about him just doesn't sit well for me !!

 

[Ok Boomer]

What if its not great but adequate?

Then no, I'm not comfortable with only 2 rucks on the list. See our KPD problems last season as to why.

 

[Suma Magic]

I remember one of the first days of preseason. Another fan asked a support staff member who his tip for the big improved was.

He said Sinclair.

At the time I was thinking "you idiot, he won't play a game unless there are injuries."

 

[Johnno22]

Option x: trade for a good deal.

If we could turn Sinclair and 36/37/55 for Jetta and 14, we'd be crazy not to.

You're dreaming if you think Swans will part with pick 14 under any circumstance.

They will not risk missing out on Mills in the Academy selection.

 

[Bender_]

I like the idea of making money off an investment we developed, but I also like having the guy in our list.

Basically I'd be happy with whatever decision he ends up making - fact is if he does end up getting traded I think it'll be because he's asked to be.

 

[mattyc75]

I would like to keep him
If we get jetta + something worthwhile and can get a ready to go 2nd/3rd ruck then so be it

 

[Suma Magic]

You're dreaming if you think Swans will part with pick 14 under any circumstance.

They will not risk missing out on Mills in the Academy selection.

Bidding has changed. They don't need 14, they just need points: http://www.afl.com.au/staticfile/AFL Tenant/AFL/Files/Father-son-bidding-system.pdf

 

[HoneyBadger35]

The one where he's a ****ing legend.

 

[ConcreteWaters]

If we get a good deal for him, sure, let him go. Lycett will be our next Cox, Sinclair will play second fiddle to both, but could flourish at a different club. What we need is for NicNat to play more than 65% of a game.
McInnes or McGovern to pinch hit in the second ruck/forward roll if both Nic and Lycett go down.

 

[BS_82]

If we get a good deal for him, sure, let him go. Lycett will be our next Cox, Sinclair will play second fiddle to both, but could flourish at a different club. What we need is for NicNat to play more than 65% of a game.
McInnes or McGovern to pinch hit in the second ruck/forward roll if both Nic and Lycett go down.

May not need Nic Nat to play more than 65% if we dramatically improve our midfield