Society/Culture Why is Multiculturalism a good thing?

[tesseract]

Also:

"The stage is now set for the death rate to outstrip the birth rate"

http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Web Pages/Population Clock

Yeah, nah.

Your post misses the point. The article isn't Australia specific. Also, it's not talking about population as a whole, it's more specific as to who's churning out the kids and which section of the population is decline.

 

[tesseract]

I use it to describe men who I think have weird motives and behaviours and language that makes me see them as potentially unhinged.

Martin Bryant was creepy. Anders Breivik was creepy. Elliot Rodger was creepy. You are creepy.

Given your version of what accounts for creepy, I'd put you in that category given your posting history of advocating violence and death. Such makes you unhinged.

 

[Floor Pie]

Your post misses the point. The article isn't Australia specific. Also, it's not talking about population as a whole, it's more specific as to who's churning out the kids and which section of the population is decline.

The article is a crock of shit, written by an idiot.
So... are you roosh?

Nah, he understands the English language doesn't have balls or ****.

 

[Floor Pie]

If you made an honest mistake then fine.

The way you capitalised the heading, and offered zero actual analysis or a qualifier that it was not something you endorse is the problem.

Either adjust your terrible communication skills (perhaps consider expanding your vocabulary, if you were a feminist you could adopt an entire gender worth of words - or speak gender specific languages like German) or continue to be ridiculed and misunderstood.

Haha, very nice post!

 

[The Coup]

Given your version of what accounts for creepy, I'd put you in that category given posting history of advocating violence and death. Such makes you unhinged.

I tend to focus my rage on individual people, people I will never meet. Thatcher. Reagan. Howard. etc.

You seem more like a "burn the world" type.

 

[tesseract]

If you made an honest mistake then fine.

The way you capitalised the heading, and offered zero actual analysis or a qualifier that it was not something you endorse is the problem.

Either adjust your terrible communication skills (perhaps consider expanding your vocabulary, if you were a feminist you could adopt an entire gender worth of words - or speak gender specific languages like German) or continue to be ridiculed and misunderstood.

You made the mistake of presumptuously positing motive.

I answered why I posted it. Your attempt to justify your erroneous presumption is deflection from being caught out.

I don't want the communication problems you and your feminist/SJW ilk have, for it involves the use of presumption to make the unfitting into something fitting.

Being ridiculed is the MO of the feminist/SJW. I accept this. They act this way because reason, logic and facts are beyond them; hence their being defined by their strawmanning and ad-homs. Even history has to be rewritten in order to justify their ideology.

 

[tesseract]

I tend to focus my rage on individual people, people I will never meet. Thatcher. Reagan. Howard. etc.

Of course you focus your rage on people you'll never meet. It is so because you well know that they'll never challenge you in return. How brave you are!

You seem more like a "burn the world" type.

Surely projection. Feminists and Social Justice Warriors with their adoption of Cultural Marxism are anti-nuclear family, anti-male, anti-Christian and so on. Basically they're deconstructionists and anti-civilization.

 

[The Coup]

Of course you focus your rage on people you'll never meet. It is so because you well know that they'll never challenge you in return. How brave you are!



Surely projection. Feminists and Social Justice Warriors with their adoption of Cultural Marxism are anti-nuclear family, anti-male, anti-Christian and so on. Basically they're deconstructionists and anti-civilization.

I'm more a "violence is not really productive anyway" type, even though I do get the rage on from time to time.

Cultural marxism was the main thing the Nazi's were scared of too. They also promoted men's rights in a similar way to you.

 

[The Coup]

You made the mistake of presumptuously positing motive.

I answered why I posted it. Your attempt to justify your erroneous presumption is deflection from being caught out.

I don't want the communication problems you and your feminist/SJW ilk have, for it involves the use of presumption to make the unfitting into something fitting.

Being ridiculed is the MO of the feminist/SJW. I accept this. They act this way because reason, logic and facts are beyond them; hence their being defined by their strawmanning and ad-homs. Even history has to be rewritten in order to justify their ideology.

If you put a tenth of this effort into your initial post, we could have avoided all of this.

But then you wouldn't be able to play the victim card. Again.

 

[Floor Pie]

Difference being that you wrote it. I didn't write the article. Nice try.

No I didn't.
I found it in a private forum online. They were talking about the avengers movie.

But trust a creepy femnazi like you to try and link it to me, even after I explained it had nothing to do with me.

 

[Floor Pie]

Floor Pie I disagree with the content of that image. But I thank you for being so clear with your explanation that you also did not agree with it. It has saved us playing a victim-themed pantomime where we pretend the world is against you.

You're most welcome!

It's almost like I held the same view when I posted it, that I did after someone called me out on it.

Not being a famnazi mangina creep, I didn't want to play the victim card.... like a woman...
Women!!!! Bah humbug!

Strange world!

 

[tesseract]

I'm more a "violence is not really productive anyway" type, even though I do get the rage on from time to time.

Cultural marxism was the main thing the Nazi's were scared of too. They also promoted men's rights in a similar way to you.

Your posting history contradicts your claim of being a "violence is not really productive anyway type".

 

[Floor Pie]

Your posting history contradicts your claim of being a "violence is not really productive anyway type".

What violent act has he committed?
Do you know who he is?
Do you have any evidence at all that he is a violent person?

Sounds like you're projecting!

He has multiple times told you that he is not violent, but you keep on going with it. Such a feminist!
Didn't get the answer you wanted, so you just keep pushing your own agenda! Magilina Jolie!

 

[swiftdog]

Your post misses the point. The article isn't Australia specific. Also, it's not talking about population as a whole, it's more specific as to who's churning out the kids and which section of the population is decline.

I know it's not Australia specific but you wouldn't have posted it if you didn't think that this cultural collapse is a possibility in Australia. Yes, the subtitle heading was "birth rates decrease among native population". The question is though, if a child is born in Australia are they a part of the native population? I'm a second generation Australian and my grandparents migrated from Europe. Am I a part of the native population or not?

I'll ask the question again: which Australian's are considered part of the native population?

 

[tesseract]

I know it's not Australia specific but you wouldn't have posted it if you didn't think that this cultural collapse is a possibility in Australia. Yes, the subtitle heading was "birth rates decrease among native population". The question is though, if a child is born in Australia are they a part of the native population? I'm a second generation Australian and my grandparents migrated from Europe. Am I a part of the native population or not?

I'll ask the question again: which Australian's are considered part of the native population?

You are not the first to presumptuously posit a motive as to my posting the article. I've already answered that question.

So, if you know the article isn't Australia specific, why are you attempting to make the article about Australia?

If you want your question answered, read the article to find out what context the author is using and apply it to Australia.

 

[smokingjacket]

Joe had long left the country and moved to Thailand, where he married a young Thai girl and had three children. He had no plans on returning to his country, America.
If cultural collapse occurs in the way I will now describe, the above scenario will be the rule within a few decades. The Western world is being colonized in reverse, not by weapons or hard power, but through a combination of progressivism and low reproductive rates. These two factors will lead to a complete cultural collapse of many Western nations within the next 200 years. This theory will show the most likely mechanism that it will proceed in America, Canada, UK, Scandinavia, and Western Europe.

Seriously what the actual...that was an exercise in masochism reading that 'opinion piece.' Sounds like someone just got himself a copy of the latest Fox News anchor pulp print and summarised it's 'findings.'

Anyways prepare ye borders South East Asia millions of disaffected MRA's are coming for your women.

For one, does South East Asia have enough poor rural women left to feed this massive nation state wife swap?

How are South East Asian nations going to cope with this massive influx of farangs looking for arranged marriage and the Thai dream?

Secondly my understanding of the whole find yourself a nice Thai girl situation was reliant on the increased living standards incentive ie. for her being granted access to the West. In that case they move back to the West, have said three babies, supposed problem solved.

Who says the gals are even interested these days anyway? GDP per capita in PPP terms of Bangkok is $39262. That compares favourably to 21 US States. CBF looking at Europe but I'm sure it's worse.

 

[swiftdog]

You are not the first to presumptuously posit a motive as to my posting the article. I've already answered that question.

So, if you know the article isn't Australia specific, why are you attempting to make the article about Australia?

If you want your question answered, read the article to find out what context the author is using and apply it to Australia.

Considering this is a thread about multiculturalism in Australia it would make sense to post articles relating to Australia or discuss the ideas that could be used in an Australian context. Otherwise, what's the point?

I've read the article, I still don't know what classifies as native population in Australia. I was hoping you would shed some light on the matter.

 

[tesseract]

Considering this is a thread about multiculturalism in Australia it would make sense to post articles relating to Australia or discuss the ideas that could be used in an Australian context. Otherwise, what's the point?

I've read the article, I still don't know what classifies as native population in Australia. I was hoping you would shed some light on the matter.

I'm free to post articles without need to adhere to your stipulation. This thread is about multiculturalism, not specifically multiculturalism in Australia.

 

[The Coup]

tess you can't repost what I was replying too though.

It was hardly a matter of mere disagreement.

 

[The Coup]

I'm free to post articles without need to adhere to your stipulation. This thread is about multiculturalism, not specifically multiculturalism in Australia.

What does the word 'Multiculturalism' mean to you tess?

And what does the term "Australian culture" mean?

Genuinely interested.

 

[smokingjacket]

Surely projection. Feminists and Social Justice Warriors with their adoption of Cultural Marxism are anti-nuclear family, anti-male, anti-Christian and so on. Basically they're deconstructionists and anti-civilization.

So to clarify Western Civilisation has reached it's end point? There's no room to build new civilisation or culture? Would you say the Enlightenment was anti-civilisation?

 

[Riseupaustralia]

So to clarify Western Civilisation has reached it's end point? There's no room to build new civilisation or culture? Would you say the Enlightenment was anti-civilisation?

Tess is of the opinion that the book of revelations is upon us.

 

[tesseract]

tess you can't repost what I was replying too though.

It was hardly a matter of mere disagreement.

It's been shown that you call for violence and death upon those whose views you don't agree with.

 

[Floor Pie]

So to clarify Western Civilisation has reached it's end point? There's no room to build new civilisation or culture? Would you say the Enlightenment was anti-civilisation?

What does the word 'Multiculturalism' mean to you tess?

And what does the term "Australian culture" mean?

Genuinely interested.

The guy thinks Obama is a pawn of Satan... what are you hoping to get out of a discussion with him?
All he can do is regurgitate shit that he reads on nutter websites. He can't answer your questions logically or without hyperbole or general bullshit.
Challenge laid out for tessa.

 

[swiftdog]

I'm free to post articles without need to adhere to your stipulation. This thread is about multiculturalism, not specifically multiculturalism in Australia.

Well this is the OP below:

The default answer to this question appears to be "they increase the variety of restaurant food" but that, to me, seems rather trivial. I've asked this a couple times to different people but no one can give me a clear, tangible benefit to Australia (eg not 'cultural enrichment', whatever that actually means). I'd be interested to see the arguments for greater multiculturalism in the country.

So yes, this thread is about multiculturalism in Australia. Therefore, by default, if you post an article without any sort of qualifier most people will assume you think it applies in an Australian context. To be honest though, I don't care why you posted the article, all I care about it the answer to the question you've been avoiding - What people make up the native population in Australia? As a second generation Australian am I part of the native population?