Will Judd get cited?

[Thaihawk]

Will Judd get cited for the use of his knees in a scrimage on Friday night? The umpire gave a free against him, and was vocal in warning him to "watch your knees."

Players have been found guilty for less, but he is Chris Judd so there will probably be no action from his admirers at the MRP.

 

[7zark7]

Judd is a dog. He should get cited for it. The bloos fans are crying over Lonergans tackle I reckon what Judd did was disgusting. I don't know why he is respected in the football community.

 

[Silvagnis]

Will Judd get cited for the use of his knees in a scrimage on Friday night? The umpire gave a free against him, and was vocal in warning him to "watch your knees."

Players have been found guilty for less, but he is Chris Judd so there will probably be no action from his admirers at the MRP.

The admirers who gave Judd two weeks after the 2009 finals?

Nothing in it.

Hocking was riding on Judd's back and pushing him forward.

http://www.smartreplay.afl.com.au/?...02&eventType=free&seek=1005&videoQuality=high

Poor umpiring like the free that was paid against the WC player (Masten?) who had no chance to get rid of the ball.

 

[MagooTheRoo]

The admirers who gave Judd two weeks after the 2009 finals?

No, the ones who said that it was ok to split Pavlich's cheek open.

 

[Big Blow Hard]

Lucky he only grazed Hockings head when he threw that backward arm/fist. A solid contact and he would definitely have been cited. He is a sneaky dog, but knows he can get away with it. To gutless/smart to have a proper swing at anyone.

 

[Slattery_20]

Not much in it. Bit of aggro, at a good tag, as per usual with Judd.

Someone in another thread said there was a gouge on Crameri, caught on camera, in the last quarter? Haven't seen the replay on that, yet. But should go if that's the case.

 

[BluesMan]

Lucky he only grazed Hockings head when he threw that backward arm/fist. A solid contact and he would definitely have been cited. He is a sneaky dog, but knows he can get away with it. To gutless/smart to have a proper swing at anyone.

Yep becuase swinging at someone means you're the bigger man, and are full of guts. Are you high? Don't say crap that no other player would do. How in the world would it be smart to have a swing at someone??? I feel emabrassed for you

 

[Thaihawk]

Yep becuase swinging at someone means you're the bigger man, and are full of guts. Are you high? Don't say crap that no other player would do. How in the world would it be smart to have a swing at someone??? I feel emabrassed for you

Obviously you haven't been watching footy for long. For if you had you would know about Judd's swing, albeit backwards, against Pav.

 

[Poseidon]

Judd doesn't follow the same rules as your loser players. Deal with it.

 

[Necromancer Beth]

Not much in it. Bit of aggro, at a good tag, as per usual with Judd.

Someone in another thread said there was a gouge on Crameri, caught on camera, in the last quarter? Haven't seen the replay on that, yet. But should go if that's the case.

This, nothing in it.

Don't know about any gouge on Crameri, but he will get the benefit of the doubt on that as well more than likely.

 

[Slattery_20]

I'm thinking the gouge is rubbish... read it in one place and asked a few Dons supporters, they haven't been able to tell me when/where in the match.

Will watch re-play at some point.

 

[ziad]

Judd doesn't follow the same rules as your loser players. Deal with it.

pressure points I guess

 

[Skystyler]

that stupid knee thing he did? insufficient impact to warrant a report.

what about Lonergan? filthy tackle with intent to injure. Should get weeks if there is any justice.

 

[Strike Swiftly]

I mentioned the attempted scratching of the face. Wont say eye gouge. I'm on my way home from work now. I'll post the exact time it occurred when I get home

 

[Strike Swiftly]

Judd scratching incident 2nd quarter 14:52 left on the clock. Was against Hurley, not Crameri. My bad. Hurley goes for mark, which should of been paid, falls to ground, Judd clearly and obviously intentionally drags his fingers against Hurley's face. Pretty obvious even without slow mo

 

[BluesMan]

Obviously you haven't been watching footy for long. For if you had you would know about Judd's swing, albeit backwards, against Pav.

WTF?
Did you even read my post, becuase if you had you wouldnt of replied with what you did which doesnt counter argue anything I said. Get a clue. Did I say anything about Judd being suspended? No

What I stated was how stupid the previous comment was for saying that it takes someone with guts to hit someone, which is absolute disgraceful. Anyone who takes a swing and makes good contact should be suspended. Judd should of been suspended for the pav one, but is that my fault? Judds fault? No, so get the f*** of your high horse ffs!

 

[Mancey]

Didn't even get a mention as an assessed incident.

Was pretty soft tho tbh

 

[84GF]

The incident wasn't worthy of being cited, but it was a low act. It baffles me why a champion footballer needs to resort to dirty underhanded tactics like this. It's not an isolated incident (eg. pressure points, Pav hit). Is he simply a sh!t bloke?

 

[mediumsizered]

The incident wasn't worthy of being cited, but it was a low act. It baffles me why a champion footballer needs to resort to dirty underhanded tactics like this. It's not an isolated incident (eg. pressure points, Pav hit). Is he simply a sh!t bloke?

I think it has a lot to do with what some parasites, I mean taggers, dish out to him & other stars of the game over & over again. If you watch some of the taggers closely, their tactics are downright disgraceful & not only a blight on the game, but a blight on the credibility of these taggers as AFL footballers.

Taggers are a necessary evil of the game nowadays (although less so than a few years ago), but some of them are just lowlifes & should be umpired out of our game.

 

[84GF]

I think it has a lot to do with what some parasites, I mean taggers, dish out to him & other stars of the game over & over again. If you watch some of the taggers closely, their tactics are downright disgraceful & not only a blight on the game, but a blight on the credibility of these taggers as AFL footballers.

Taggers are a necessary evil of the game nowadays (although less so than a few years ago), but some of them are just lowlifes & should be umpired out of our game.

Plenty of players get tagged, yet you don't see Pendlebury, Ablett, Murphy, Hayes, etc. commit the low acts. The other bloke with form in this area is his old team mate Daniel Kerr - both great footballers, but probably not the best blokes.

 

[84GF]

I think it has a lot to do with what some parasites, I mean taggers, dish out to him & other stars of the game over & over again. If you watch some of the taggers closely, their tactics are downright disgraceful & not only a blight on the game, but a blight on the credibility of these taggers as AFL footballers.

Taggers are a necessary evil of the game nowadays (although less so than a few years ago), but some of them are just lowlifes & should be umpired out of our game.

Also, where does Carazzo fit in your view of taggers?

 

[Big Blow Hard]

WTF?
Did you even read my post, becuase if you had you wouldnt of replied with what you did which doesnt counter argue anything I said. Get a clue. Did I say anything about Judd being suspended? No

What I stated was how stupid the previous comment was for saying that it takes someone with guts to hit someone, which is absolute disgraceful. Anyone who takes a swing and makes good contact should be suspended. Judd should of been suspended for the pav one, but is that my fault? Judds fault? No, so get the f*** of your high horse ffs!

You are the one who misunderstood. I didnt say it takes guts to hit someone. I said Judd chooses spineless ways to try to hurt people. If he had any balls, he would stand face to face with someone instead of sneaky punches pinching and gouging.