This sounds like a joke and will almost certainly turn out to be a joke.
Woggabaliri is apparently a game played by aborigines in central NSW pre-eurpean settlement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woggabaliri
"Often confused as a variant of Marn Grook, Woggabaliri is a non-competitive game played with a ball made of Bulrush roots wrapped in possum fur where the aim is to keep the ball in the air using football (soccer) type skills of teamwork and ball control"
Now, it is hard to see how it could have been often confused with anything, given that a google seach provides 74 results (a peter daicos 35 without "similar entries")
It has been apparently included by the FFA in the bid book as a demonstration of Australia's milenia long affintiy with the round game.
The first reference to the game appears to be 2007, when it was cited in a list of traditional aboriginal sports.
http://www.dsr.nsw.gov.au/assets/pubs/sshorts/ss_august07.pdf
The only historical reference to the game a regurgitated in WIKI is:
Woggabaliri is recognised by the Australian Sports Commission as the oldest Indigenous game and is the earliest depicted, believed to be the subject of an engraving "never let the ball hit the ground" based on William Blandowski's observations in 1857 of camp life near Merbein, Victoria.[1]
So from an etching that referred to a game that involved "never letting the ball hit the ground" in Victoria, with no apparent reference to what they are doing with their hands, it has been extrapolated a game like an english school yard soccer derivative was played in central NSW.
Now the FFA and the NSW govt pushing this to promote to aboriginal kids is not surprising. North Korean kids are taught that 83% of all technolgical advancements were discovered and innovated first in their country. Paranoia and jealousy is a cocktail that has an inverse affect to a truth serum.
The concern however is it appears that the Australian Sports Commission are now promoting the same to aborignal kids.
http://www.ausport.gov.au/participa...s/individual_games/ball_games/woggabaliri.pdf
Now kids (and particularly aboriginal kids) participating in physical activity is obviously a good thing so a pragmatist might feel it perfectly valid and ethical to manufacture aboriginal history to get them playing any game.
The ASC, however, has form.
The ASC if you are unaware, is a commonwealth tax payer funded agencythe legislated objectives are:
> excellence in sports performances by Australians.
Without excessively researching, the ASC doles out about $100 million a year to achieve these aims. You will notice if you look at their 2008/09 annual report that it has historically skews vast bulk of this to the second
objective. Additionally it appears to interpret the second as "success in olympic sports and soccer".
So it sees itself as basically a mechanism for satiating jingoism and cultural cringe, providing little resources to the first objective that, I would think anyway, should be their primary objective.
http://www.ausport.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/334254/Annual_Report_08-09.pdf
Without going at length into it (not even sure if the govt has responded yet) a recent independent inquiry found just that and recommended a rebalancing towards promoting participation and away from the Olympic gold medal standard
you can read it here:
http://www.sportpanel.org.au/internet/sportpanel/publishing.nsf/Content/crawford-report
The ASC's submission to this provides interesting reading. Interstingly though it referes to soccer as "Australian football" throughout the document.
http://www.sportpanel.org.au/intern...E/Australian Sports Commission_15-10-2008.pdf
In its submission, the AFL noted that the ASC has provided feedback to the AFL that it views it as a "competitor" for athletic talent that should be persuing succes for straya rather than playing the national game.
http://www.sportpanel.org.au/internet/sportpanel/publishing.nsf/Content/Australian+Football+League
You might note that the AFL spends considerably more on grass roots development and particpation than the ASC, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of turnover.
So now has the ASC has gone beyond its traditional role of skewing taxpayer resources away from sports people want to play towards those that boost jingoism, to fabricating aboriginal history to get kids to play soccer (Australian football)?
Well we'll see. Perhaps there might be some linguistic validation to the admittedly hilariously named "woggabaliri", and maybe some actual evidence will emerge that such a game existed.
Anyway, til then, watch this space.
And note the Wiki article on "football" has already been updated to incorporate this incredible development in our understanding of our first peoples history
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football
Woggabaliri is apparently a game played by aborigines in central NSW pre-eurpean settlement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woggabaliri
"Often confused as a variant of Marn Grook, Woggabaliri is a non-competitive game played with a ball made of Bulrush roots wrapped in possum fur where the aim is to keep the ball in the air using football (soccer) type skills of teamwork and ball control"
Now, it is hard to see how it could have been often confused with anything, given that a google seach provides 74 results (a peter daicos 35 without "similar entries")
It has been apparently included by the FFA in the bid book as a demonstration of Australia's milenia long affintiy with the round game.
The first reference to the game appears to be 2007, when it was cited in a list of traditional aboriginal sports.
http://www.dsr.nsw.gov.au/assets/pubs/sshorts/ss_august07.pdf
The only historical reference to the game a regurgitated in WIKI is:
Woggabaliri is recognised by the Australian Sports Commission as the oldest Indigenous game and is the earliest depicted, believed to be the subject of an engraving "never let the ball hit the ground" based on William Blandowski's observations in 1857 of camp life near Merbein, Victoria.[1]
So from an etching that referred to a game that involved "never letting the ball hit the ground" in Victoria, with no apparent reference to what they are doing with their hands, it has been extrapolated a game like an english school yard soccer derivative was played in central NSW.
Now the FFA and the NSW govt pushing this to promote to aboriginal kids is not surprising. North Korean kids are taught that 83% of all technolgical advancements were discovered and innovated first in their country. Paranoia and jealousy is a cocktail that has an inverse affect to a truth serum.
The concern however is it appears that the Australian Sports Commission are now promoting the same to aborignal kids.
http://www.ausport.gov.au/participa...s/individual_games/ball_games/woggabaliri.pdf
Now kids (and particularly aboriginal kids) participating in physical activity is obviously a good thing so a pragmatist might feel it perfectly valid and ethical to manufacture aboriginal history to get them playing any game.
The ASC, however, has form.
The ASC if you are unaware, is a commonwealth tax payer funded agencythe legislated objectives are:
>
an effective national sports system that offers improved participation in quality sports
activities by Australians
activities by Australians
> excellence in sports performances by Australians.
Without excessively researching, the ASC doles out about $100 million a year to achieve these aims. You will notice if you look at their 2008/09 annual report that it has historically skews vast bulk of this to the second
objective. Additionally it appears to interpret the second as "success in olympic sports and soccer".
So it sees itself as basically a mechanism for satiating jingoism and cultural cringe, providing little resources to the first objective that, I would think anyway, should be their primary objective.
http://www.ausport.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/334254/Annual_Report_08-09.pdf
Without going at length into it (not even sure if the govt has responded yet) a recent independent inquiry found just that and recommended a rebalancing towards promoting participation and away from the Olympic gold medal standard
you can read it here:
http://www.sportpanel.org.au/internet/sportpanel/publishing.nsf/Content/crawford-report
The ASC's submission to this provides interesting reading. Interstingly though it referes to soccer as "Australian football" throughout the document.
http://www.sportpanel.org.au/intern...E/Australian Sports Commission_15-10-2008.pdf
In its submission, the AFL noted that the ASC has provided feedback to the AFL that it views it as a "competitor" for athletic talent that should be persuing succes for straya rather than playing the national game.
http://www.sportpanel.org.au/internet/sportpanel/publishing.nsf/Content/Australian+Football+League
You might note that the AFL spends considerably more on grass roots development and particpation than the ASC, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of turnover.
So now has the ASC has gone beyond its traditional role of skewing taxpayer resources away from sports people want to play towards those that boost jingoism, to fabricating aboriginal history to get kids to play soccer (Australian football)?
Well we'll see. Perhaps there might be some linguistic validation to the admittedly hilariously named "woggabaliri", and maybe some actual evidence will emerge that such a game existed.
Anyway, til then, watch this space.
And note the Wiki article on "football" has already been updated to incorporate this incredible development in our understanding of our first peoples history
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football




