jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
Hang on. We won't be saying that if we lose one of our stars for nothing.
I've been saying it from the get go.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Western Bulldogs v Sydney - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Dogs at 55% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 11
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Hang on. We won't be saying that if we lose one of our stars for nothing.
You are a bit difficult to figure out.I'm not a fan. I'm not sure I can be any clearer.
Hartigan will be a very good defender IMO however not the type that can take the monster Cloke type of forward however Frawley on the other hand is tailor made for this role
I'd take Henderson in a heartbeat.Was going to say, I reckon Murphy and Gibbs have suffered very similar fates.
I wish Lachie Henderson played for a different club. I rate the guy incredibly highly and reckon he could be a star of the game in another side.
When you actually sit down and look at a lot of Carlton's youngsters, it's amazing how little so many of them have achieved. I dont want to be taking pot shot after pot shot at Carlton here, but their list development is questionable at best.
Hartigan will be a very good defender IMO however not the type that can take the monster Cloke type of forward however Frawley on the other hand is tailor made for this role
Why is that? It can't be based on size, because Hartigan is bigger than Frawley.
I watched highlights of Tex vs Melbourne in 2012 where he kicked 5 goals. He actually embarrassed Frawley in a couple of one on ones.
I think Frawley is somehow getting better and better in the eyes of some now that he's a FA.
I'm not a fan. I'm not sure I can be any clearer.
We have an abundance of class already. Can't see Gibbs doing much for us.
Not really criticising ......just observations of improvements he needs to make & canFor all your criticism of Hartigan, surely you can agree he is at least an afl ready defender unlike Shaw.
He will get better with experience but does not have any major flaws.
As you know I supported Douglas in early years & always been a fan of Smith but Shaw still has a huge issue with being able to consistently kick the ball to team mate. My eyes don't lie. He needs to fix this in the sanfl before he is afl ready.Not really criticising ......just observations of improvements he needs to make & can
Shaw we'll have to disagree on .....i like the lad A LOT!
But this board savaged Douglas & to a lesser degree Smith because he wasn't an instant star
Shaw, hamstrings allowing, will be a good footballer .........this crap about kicking is only used on the targeted scapegoats, i can think of 6 other players who have crapped a delivery ....bunkum !
Kane, Kane .....the kid still has no confidence in his body, his hamstrings ...and hasn't strung too many games on the trotAs you know I supported Douglas in early years & always been a fan of Smith but Shaw still has a huge issue with being able to consistently kick the ball to team mate. My eyes don't lie. He needs to fix this in the sanfl before he is afl ready.
Give the guy a go .....as i said Danger when he came in was twice as bad, but that's always conveniently overlooked
Injury is not the reason for his kicking flaw.Kane, Kane .....the kid still has no confidence in his body, his hamstrings ...and hasn't strung too many games on the trot
Give the guy a go .....as i said Danger when he came in was twice as bad, but that's always conveniently overlooked
Absolutely
The AFL is allowing players to change teams without any compensation and this is only going to allow the strong clubs to get better. There has to be a form of compensation that is equal to the value of the player, if the AFL doesnt want to give the picks then the team who gets the player needs to compensate the team who lost him.That's not what she said. She said there shouldn't be compensation for free agency and there shouldn't be. Getting the salary cap freedom is the upside you receive.
That being said, there BETTER still be compo if we lose Danger.
I too have always rated shaw.Kane, Kane .....the kid still has no confidence in his body, his hamstrings ...and hasn't strung too many games on the trot
Give the guy a go .....as i said Danger when he came in was twice as bad, but that's always conveniently overlooked
The AFL is allowing players to change teams without any compensation and this is only going to allow the strong clubs to get better. There has to be a form of compensation that is equal to the value of the player, if the AFL doesnt want to give the picks then the team who gets the player needs to compensate the team who lost him.
Good thing you said it so everyone can see what nonsense you spit out and disregard it.Kane, Kane .....the kid still has no confidence in his body, his hamstrings ...and hasn't strung too many games on the trot
Give the guy a go .....as i said Danger when he came in was twice as bad, but that's always conveniently overlooked
Are you saying this because of their respective sizes, or because of the way they play?
But TSR isn't that our need ? ........Talia can cover the mobile type forwards, we need a good body player & i agree hartigan doesn't appear ATS to be that player ....as i said though the body & core can be developedjust in the way he plays
IMO Hartigan will be a good match up on the quick leading KPF as this plays to his strengths, at this stage I dont see Kyle as that body to body KPD that can match a Cloke or J Brown type in a strength contest
Hartigan looks like an absolute unit?