Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ahh so you intended to put words in my mouth again and misrepresent what was said by me.I understood your comment to mean consensus, not a couple of people.
Have you read the study from your first link? "Gay Marriage and Homosexuality, Some Medical Comments"
I'm willing to put money down, that you haven't actually read the study.
Also, you might want to read this.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/t...a-christian-youre-just-no-good-with-evidence/
It's about one of the authors of the study, and also points out the demonstrably false 'facts' the study provides.
In reply to being called out for saying;Ahh so you intended to put words in my mouth again and misrepresent what was said by me.
Think that's all ineeded to know.
Your response was;Why should I support unusually obscene sexual relationship.
If you said it was backed by some medical practitioners, I would have understood you to mean "it is backed by some religious nutters and fellow homophobes"it is backed by medical practitioners too.
No.Do you also oppose vaccines?
Most medical practitioners engaging in best practice pretty much are aware that in certain classes of persons there are enhanced issues or risks of a medical nature. Hence they give advice that is different on account of suiting their situations.How so?
No the words medical practitioners simply refers to more than one and not automatically to an overwhelming consensus as you assumed falsely.In reply to being called out for saying;
Your response was;
If you said it was backed by some medical practitioners, I would have understood you to mean "it is backed by some religious nutters and fellow homophobes"
Not putting words in your mouth at all.
I notice you didn't respond to my point about the study, so I'll assume you concede?
Because those same health issues don't affect the heterosexual community....right!The fact that their sexual behaviours cause health issues.
Nowhere near the way in which they affect the heterosexual community for one in some instances and secondly some of the sexual stuff undertaken by gays and the environment in which exists is nowhere close to that of straight people.Because those same health issues don't affect the heterosexual community
They eat da poo poo?Nowhere near the way in which they affect the heterosexual community for one in some instances and secondly some of the sexual stuff undertaken by gays and the environment in which exists is nowhere close to that of straight people.
So we dismiss their right for same sex marriage because 'You; believe they engage in acts that increase the health risks for this group Care to back up these suppositionsNowhere near the way in which they affect the heterosexual community for one in some instances and secondly some of the sexual stuff undertaken by gays and the environment in which exists is nowhere close to that of straight people.
The fact that their sexual behaviours cause health issues.
Yes. Straight parents, not straight married couples.Absolutely it is related trying to say they are not is wrong. it is an argument of criticism constantly bought up against straight parents who have seperated and associated negative effects on the children the same as gay couples get criticised fir bringing up children without their opposing sex parent. It legitimises this negative act.
whether they are mutually exclusive or not is irrelevant. Other marriage forms include sick religious extremists Muslims asking to allow marriage to juvenile brides.
It has effects on the child which they raise for starter secocondly it can be a source for other forms of marriage equality being raised.
So given that gay couples can already adopt a child in about half the states in Australia, the first point is really irrelevant here. I mean, if they're already your parents, they're raising you, married or not.It has effects on the child which they raise for starter secocondly it can be a source for other forms of marriage equality being raised.
So straight males cannot perform anal sex acts? Straight people can't perform oral sex? Straight people cannot have STDs and go around clubbing and having unprotected sex with strangers?The fact that their sexual behaviours cause health issues.
Out of curiosity, do you also think that single people shouldn't have children (be able to adopt etc)? What if someone is single and gay?Being against gay-marriage does not make you homophobic; if that's what the Greens were trying to say, it just reinforces what a pack of lunatics they are.
Personally, I don't see the problem. I don't think they should have children however.
It's all a tricky subject. Child Welfare is the most important factor, and if it was proven they'd be able to live a happy & healthy life, I wouldn't have any issues with them being raised by gay couples or single parents.Out of curiosity, do you also think that single people shouldn't have children (be able to adopt etc)? What if someone is single and gay?
No.
Most medical practitioners engaging in best practice pretty much are aware that in certain classes of persons there are enhanced issues or risks of a medical nature. Hence they give advice that is different on account of suiting their situations.
For example you realise there is evidence pointing to the increased risks associated with amphetamine use and aids and that this practice is significantly higher per capita in male homosexuals than in other subsets. Next there is also the fact that there is statistical evidence pointing to the risky behaviour gay men engage in when compared to straight men which again actually places them at a much higher risk than a straight person of contracting diseases. Lastly there are also anal sex issues which are exacerbated (and the vast majority are experienced by gay males.) that also need noticeably increased and provided to homosexual males in much more prevalent manners than to straight females.
No.
Most medical practitioners engaging in best practice pretty much are aware that in certain classes of persons there are enhanced issues or risks of a medical nature. Hence they give advice that is different on account of suiting their situations.
For example you realise there is evidence pointing to the increased risks associated with amphetamine use and aids and that this practice is significantly higher per capita in male homosexuals than in other subsets. Next there is also the fact that there is statistical evidence pointing to the risky behaviour gay men engage in when compared to straight men which again actually places them at a much higher risk than a straight person of contracting diseases. Lastly there are also anal sex issues which are exacerbated (and the vast majority are experienced by gay males.) that also need noticeably increased and provided to homosexual males in much more prevalent manners than to straight females.
I think you need to be comfortable with your own sexuality to admit that.