See right there, with the capital 'G'. You just don't get it.It can be God
Now, let's stop derailing this thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
See right there, with the capital 'G'. You just don't get it.It can be God
I am happy not to "derail" any further.See right there, with the capital 'G'. You just don't get it.
Now, let's stop derailing this thread.
Precisely. And if that's the subject, then we're entitled to mention Goldilocks, Humpty Dumpty and other fairy tales.
You will have to take it up with the people who started this aside in the thread.
Worship means to give worth to something/someone who is worthy. It also entails what we gain our own worth from. It can be God - the legitimate being to whom worship is due; or it can be something else that we consider the ultimate authority/being/thing of worth.
Everybody worships something/someone. For most people, its is themselves - but it could be a career, money, pleasure, family, a footy club. But whatever it is, the truth remains that everyone worships something - you included.
Whoah there, careful with those facts of yours, you'll spark a logical, rational discussion and we can't have that. Back to the footy...Actually, "worship" has two separate meanings, and you're erroneously conflating them.
Meaning one: "devotion and reverent love accorded to a deity, being, object, idol, etc on religious pretexts". Meaning two: "strong adoration or reverence".
Actually, "worship" has two separate meanings, and you're erroneously conflating them.
Meaning one: "devotion and reverent love accorded to a deity, being, object, idol, etc on religious pretexts". Meaning two: "strong adoration or reverence".
In fact you can find far more dictionary definitions than that.
But there is no conflagration here. Both definitions you provide relate to adoration or reverence - worship. The issue in discussion is that everyone worships something/someone - strong adoration or reverence/devotion for someone/thing.
What you worship is a different thing. But everyone worships something/someone. You may not want to call it worship, but in the end ones devotion to that thing or person (including self) that holds highest regard, is worship.
Whoah there, careful with those facts of yours, you'll spark a logical, rational discussion and we can't have that. Back to the footy...
Vardy and Menzel, fit and in form, despite the long layoff for both, are the difference between being middling and being in contention. Therefore, get them right. Everyone else is expendable.
In fact you can find far more dictionary definitions than that.
But there is no conflagration here. Both definitions you provide relate to adoration or reverence - worship. The issue in discussion is that everyone worships something/someone - strong adoration or reverence/devotion for someone/thing.
What you worship is a different thing. But everyone worships something/someone. You may not want to call it worship, but in the end ones devotion to that thing or person (including self) that holds highest regard, is worship.
Yeah, you do. You just don't realise it.
Whatever people give worth to, whatever they derive their worth from, is what they worship.
Good chance its themselves.
Interesting. I don't think they'll make any difference at all next season. Even IF Menzel plays any senior football (which I very much doubt), will struggle mightily. Vardy still has to show he deserves to be CHF ahead of other contenders. As a forward he's a mark and kick player, just like Walker, except Walker is fitter and more durable. And lately, more improved.
If we're depending on those two next year we're in trouble.
Vardy will be a welcomed inclusion mate. Wouldn't put it past him to slot 35+ goals if he plays forward for most of the season. I reckon if we secure Minson, or another ruck, we will see Walker play the backup ruck and Blicavs move to more or a permanent defensive role instead of that 2nd ruck position.
Vardy will be a welcomed inclusion mate. Wouldn't put it past him to slot 35+ goals if he plays forward for most of the season. I reckon if we secure Minson, or another ruck, we will see Walker play the backup ruck and Blicavs move to more or a permanent defensive role instead of that 2nd ruck position.
It comes as emerging forward Shane Kersten, who made his long-awaited debut this season, was sent for post-season arthroscopic surgery on his knee.
The 21-year-old, regarded as a long-term forward prospect at the Cats, played nine consecutive matches this year before his season was ended by a hamstring injury.
You mean Nutters' Corner?
It would be nice to know when Kersten hurt his knee or how long he had been carrying that issue and if that was a reason for the drop off in performance from him - and in turn if we could have got Walker/Brown into the side earlier then week 23.
I generally pray to Satyr, the god of lust, and he doesn't give a fig about footy...This is just such an important topic and is something we all need to pray for every single night
IT was an arthroscope….probably just a clean out……...
Players come back after two weeks following a "scope" these days. I just hope his hamstring is 100% and doesn't recur.
Vardy's might depend on how his knee has pulled up during recovery - they might decide that due to his history of injury concerns that it is better to have him on a restricted or limited pre-season schedule early and ramp up his training prior to Christmas to see how he then pulls up with a break and then really go for it after that break if he is able to.
Vardy's previous issues were with his hip. How his knee surgery has any relationship to his hip problems is beyond me.
Didn't Vardy himself say that his hip issues meant that he would need to be "managed" for the rest of his career?Yeah, 2 injuries, fully recovered from one, does not equate to a "history of injury concerns".
Didn't Vardy himself say that his hip issues meant that he would need to be "managed" for the rest of his career?
Doing his knee might put stress on one or other of his hips and cause problems- perhaps. I don't think any leg injury can be considered in isolation in Vardy's case.
That's terrible!Well the hip was managed successfully to the extent that he was able to play part-time and full-time in the ruck.
The real issue is the ACL itself; in 2013 there were 23 over the whole comp, but more than 1/3rd of them - 8 - were recurrences.