- Apr 11, 2015
- 4,150
- 5,010
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Cill Chainnigh
Oops, Double post.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Think you might have written this article SGee
Very true too - local footy is an anachronism really. Basically there should be a competition created 1 level below VFL footy (if you like) and clubs apply to be part of. One of the pillars would be financial status and a capacity to spend say $200K on players and personnel. You may decide to spend more but this is the minimum spend you should budget for. Other pillars might include junior set up, admin set up, capacity to generate funds (so the club isn't reliant on 1 big benefactor), facilities and probably a couple of others. FV decide who gets in. It would be a Super Comp as SG used to like calling it. Yes it will take players from local comps - so be it - already happens now, but it will also take a fair bit of pressure off a number of sides in good comps in the EFL, EDFL, NFL and others. If you want top coin then there is a comp for you...
If a club president doesn't think player payments are sustainable, they're welcome to pay less and perhaps end up in a lower division, or move to the amateurs.
I don't know why some clubs who are having trouble with player payments are trying to drag other clubs down to their level with new rules etc.
If player payments were unsustainable, why are Vermont, NP, Balwyn able to sustain it? Must be sustainable for them. Clubs like Norwood are also able to compete when they get their circumstances right.
Lower level clubs will eventually fall to a division that suits them. It's been a long time since a club folded completely, so whatever's happening must be relatively sustainable.
That word 'unsustainable' has been completely misused in this discussion. If a club spends 'unsustainably' it's their own fault and if they can't afford to stay in 2nd division, they should fall to 3rd division gracefully.
As has been pointed out repeatedly, the plan will have more than just the intended consequence of lower pay. It might lower pay for some, but will sky rocket for other local players.
If a club really doesn't want to pay players, the VAFA is Melbourne-wide.
It's obvious you don't know what goes on behind the scenes as your next lot of examples have let you with egg on your face once again. Croydon tried and spent $$$$ to keep up with the likes of NP, Balwyn and Vermont and the nearly folded. They have done really well but once again are spending money they saved and are building up again and that is what Croydon do. Doncaster has one major person inputting huge dollars, when he gets bored pumping the dollars what then? Don't know enough about Doncaster East but they aint paying peanuts, they have a lot of sponsors but my calculations is the sponsors would not be bringing in that much money to cover their player payments. No club without an income stream can sustain current player payments.Well, Croydon, Doncaster, Donny East can all sustain what they're paying presumably. Do they have pokies too?
It's all sustainable. When it's not, the competition will collapse.
If it's not sustainable for a club, they can drop to the level that they can sustain.
The points system will make it harder for clubs with less money, because they'll be competing harder for the local players and maybe a high points player will trickle down to them and take all their cash.
Doncaster has one major person inputting huge dollars, when he gets bored pumping the dollars what then?
Hope he stays around as do the others.Yes we are waiting, the selfish prick has been at the club since playing in the 1960's and refuses to get bored, the other 2 major inputters who you haven't mentioned are not nearly as loyal, they only played in the 1970's
Well East Burwood has made the hard call. They advised players that they cannot sustain the current player payments and advised them them that there will be a 50% pay cut. They have done this before the transfer cut off and any player wishing to leave will be cleared straight away. Gone are the Jacksons, Hughes, McKenzie so far. Watch the transfers I guess.
Good points Vanderhum, if they don't tell them and they play on and at the end of the season (which plenty of clubs have done) and they don't get paid, what then? I will take it the club has been up front rather the bullshit to them and on performance they are not worth what they have been paid. I will pull you up on the a club that was struggling, they have been struggling since 2004.
I hear what you are saying and your point is well made regarding the club being up front with the players but the fall out for EB is going to seriously challenge their viability in 2016. No juniors and word is the seconds might not be able to field a team on Saturday which suggests their participation in EFL is on the edge of the cliff. One point that should not be lost in this crisis is to recognise the players who have, in the full knowledge of the finances, decided to stick around. The guys that run out on Saturday for The Rams should be congratulated
I head to Ram Stadium to simply support the players. I never got to know the new players that have left so no they are no loss to me. The Juniors have the right people in charge this year. Last years President was more worried about his sons getting a game and I am grateful he pissed off with his sons. Under 17's will fill in the magoos which was a hard task to get that too happen last year. The Rams need an U19's, they had 25 players say they will play last year, come training 4 turned up. It's not through lack of trying.
My thoughts are it's pretty basic. No wins + no attendance = no income being generated.Signing players for $$ and then not honouring it is another thing altogether. What has changed since the offseason that they now don't have the money?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hold on there Richie, where you have I said that the EFL is a bad place?
Where have you got the idea that Peaky is some sort of a trail blazer?
Why do you think we are living in the past?
In 1992 we won a flag and in 1999 and 2000 we won a repeat, however, you, are probably right, we wouldn't have have given a s**t, because we paid a competitive price for players. At that time we had an ex AFL player as our coach with contacts and his father was an EB legend, who helped the club in any way possible. We got good information and we acted on it.
Not sure I understand, "just find it laughable that him and a few others think that the EFL" is a bad place. When has Peaky or me said that?
2000 is 15 years ago.
Actually surf around quite a few sports blogs and often find pretty good reads. SBNation is another good one, though not really on Australian things.
Basically I agree with it, just expressed better than I can! The VFA was killed and has never been replaced. Think there's a level of footy missing there and we'd benefit by getting it back. There's "local" clubs around who are better resourced than standalone VFL clubs. Put them where they belong and make community footy genuine community footy - not a commercial pursuit.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes we are waiting, the selfish prick has been at the club since playing in the 1960's and refuses to get bored, the other 2 major inputters who you haven't mentioned are not nearly as loyal, they only played in the 1970's
I hear what you are saying and your point is well made regarding the club being up front with the players but the fall out for EB is going to seriously challenge their viability in 2016. No juniors and word is the seconds might not be able to field a team on Saturday which suggests their participation in EFL is on the edge of the cliff. One point that should not be lost in this crisis is to recognise the players who have, in the full knowledge of the finances, decided to stick around. The guys that run out on Saturday for The Rams should be congratulated
Great points and I will add that people follow winners, no one follows losers and this can be spread across the realm of sport. East Burwood has all the same type of functions and they struggle to get numbers. EB have a Sportsmans nights coming up $100 a head all inclusive with Mark Thompson, Barry Michael and Nick Maxwell yet is struggling to get numbers. The same s**t has been happening for many years and I will say again it's not through lack of trying from the small band of hardcore East Burwood people.It is amazing just how many people know so little about our club & the belief that we run on the funding of one benefactor.
Try & get a ticket to the Business Lunch that sells out months beforehand every year for $150.00 a pop.
How many coterie members are there that pay a minimum $200.00 a season? - many pay $500.00.
Reverse raffle - noticed at Mooroolbark they has there numbers set up last week. Doncaster sell just as many, at more than double the price.
These are just a few examples of how there is further separation to the 'revenue' streams at some clubs. Look at the top end 1st Division clubs & you will see similar stories. Anyone ever attended the Balwyn Business Lunch? or their Pre-season launch encompassing the player auction? Easy to blame benefactors but perhaps there is some things that clubs could learn from some of the high end clubs.
Perhaps good sponsors contribute to the success of clubs & make these things easier run & sell, but it could also be that these clubs are more professional in many of the numerous areas that are required and this snowballs into success on & off the field.
Genuine question - Is having senior finals each year not the money spin that it once was? You look at the clubs that get them & they are none of them are exactly flying.