Football / Coaching Department

Remove this Banner Ad

What's your excuse for seeking him out then?

Hughes' problems may not have had as much to do with his eye, as for his ears.
Maybe he shouldn't have been listening to others guiding him along and made his own decisions.
He is being looked at as a scout. As long as he doesn't make the final decisions, I will accept us signing him.
 
As for cripps. The timing is perfect. He's living in Melb and he's at a point with the port list where the list management becomes less about u18 talent and more about challenging.

Would be a big promotion for him. Looks like a bloke who sets the bar high.

It's a risky appointment by us but let's face it, given our position and finances any appointment will carry risk

I'd be wrapt with him
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Why do we need a scout anyway ?
Im sure between all us good folk on here we could come up with what kids to recruit .
After 1200 posts , 100 suspensions, 50 deleted accounts , 400 hissy fits ....
ummm second thoughts maybe Hughes is a good pick up :)
 
Yep, so it has to be someone that has been in recruiting for the last few years then. If he is best (see maybe only?) available, so be it.
I must admit though, if I had to choose a club to get a recruiting staffer from, Carlton would be almost the last club of the modern era of drafting that I would be looking at.
 
Yep, so it has to be someone that has been in recruiting for the last few years then. If he is best (see maybe only?) available, so be it.
I must admit though, if I had to choose a club to get a recruiting staffer from, Carlton would be almost the last club of the modern era of drafting.
I don't get it though, we got rid of peltch because his role was redundant, and now we are hiring someone to do exactly what peltch did..
 
I don't get it though, we got rid of peltch because his role was redundant, and now we are hiring someone to do exactly what peltch did..
Seems to me Hughes is specialising in Trade & FA, where as Pelch oversaw everything..
 
Seems to me Hughes is specialising in Trade & FA, where as Pelch oversaw everything..
Well that makes me feel much better..........
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I don't get it though, we got rid of peltch because his role was redundant, and now we are hiring someone to do exactly what peltch did..
Technically, it sounds more like somebody to do exactly what Ameet did, before he became COO. My problem isn't the position. My problem is the person they're thinking of for it. You might as well get somebody from West Coast to teach about drug prevention.
 
I don't get it though, we got rid of peltch because his role was redundant, and now we are hiring someone to do exactly what peltch did..
Nah, Peltch did FAR more than what this role seems to include. Would have been only 1 of his roles. Peltch did contracts, TPP, etc. etc.
I think a key thing to note in comparison to Peltch is that the $ this role would pay compared to what Peltch was on would be probably 25%. (I think I recall that Peltch was rumored to be on about $450K) I would guess a scout wouldn't be on much more than $100K. $$$ is what cost Peltch his job, and what Finnis is charged with saving.
 
Technically, it sounds more like somebody to do exactly what Ameet did, before he became COO. My problem isn't the position. My problem is the person they're thinking of for it. You might as well get somebody from West Coast to teach about drug prevention.
Ameet has always been involved in the contract & TPP side of things. Last few years it was Ameet and Peltch who handled everything to do with the playing list. Trout worked under them with his team. I think this role for Hughes would be more like the roles that Chris Liberatore and Mark Baynard have as recruiting scouts under Trout.
 
Last edited:
I don't get it though, we got rid of peltch because his role was redundant, and now we are hiring someone to do exactly what peltch did..

pelch initially suggested the role, sounded like we didnt have anyone to spend the time on it properly. would have been a fraction of pelch's role. basically someone fully dedicated to the existing talent in the AFL system

plus he'd be much much much much more cheaper than pelch

love the idea of the role..dont like the recent suggestion

but you know what since summers took over, everyone of the leaks have been people that we've shaken our head too, only to end up with someone we have all been happy with. i see this as the same thing, probably another leak to keep our name in the media and them away from the actual target

EDIT: just noticed i am repeating Wright 1 and Persevering Saint
 
FWIW we are looking for someone to replace Mark Barnard who has not had his contract renewed. He finished on Friday.
Hughes has applied for the position, as have several other industry people.
Who is mark Barnard and why should I be mad that we didn't resign him
 
Who is mark Barnard and why should I be mad that we didn't resign him
4728298-3x2-940x627.jpg
 
thats old man bevo

i'm thinking the other one, who was recently seen in the draft videos
*facepalm* Actually now that I see that I realise the old guy in the videos is different to that guy.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top