- Thread starter
- #76
I honestly thought Gav Urquhart would end up a better player than Scott Pendlebury.
Still time
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I honestly thought Gav Urquhart would end up a better player than Scott Pendlebury.
Geelong lost by 5 goals, not 5 points. They conceded 18 goals, 7 behinds. How many teams have won Grand Finals after conceding 18 goals? Hawthorn took their chances. That was the difference. Scoreboard pressure. We had Williams, Dew, Cyril, Brown, Young, Mitchell, Hodge and Buddy nailing goals from everywhere.
edit: 3 premiership teams in 119 years have conceded 16 goals or more on Grand Final day
1972 Carlton 28.9 def Richmond 22.18
1977 North Melb 21.25 def Collingwood 19.11
1989 Hawthorn 21.18 def Geelong 21.12
Since 1989, no premiership team has conceded more than 13 goals.
No they weren't, only 2 at most would of resulted in a free with the current ruling.You forgot to mention the 11 rushed behinds, most of which were very blatantly deliberate, and led to a very rapid response by the AFL to change the rule.
IMO wouldve been a very different result if Clarko didnt use that tactic.
Geelong lost by 5 goals, not 5 points. They conceded 18 goals, 7 behinds. How many teams have won Grand Finals after conceding 18 goals? Hawthorn took their chances. That was the difference. Scoreboard pressure. We had Williams, Dew, Cyril, Brown, Young, Mitchell, Hodge and Buddy nailing goals from everywhere.
edit: 3 premiership teams in 119 years have conceded 16 goals or more on Grand Final day
1972 Carlton 28.9 def Richmond 22.18
1977 North Melb 21.25 def Collingwood 19.11
1989 Hawthorn 21.18 def Geelong 21.12
Since 1989, no premiership team has conceded more than 13 goals.
No they weren't, only 2 at most would of resulted in a free with the current ruling.
The rule was change due to the Richmond player rushing the behind straight from the kick in not Hawthorn.
Yeah, exactly. Those weren't goal scoring opportunities however. That was Hawthorn defenders taking the piss - they were using rules & tactics of the day to their advantage. Subtract 11 rushed behinds and you have a scoreline of 18.7 to 11.11. Let's say Geelong scored 3 goals from Hawk defenders turning it over on those 11 rushed behinds. Ignoring chaos theory & cause/effect, the score would still be 18.7 to 14.11. The game wasn't really that close. Hawthorn had a match-winning lead at 3/4 time and they held Geelong at bay with ease. It was a warm day and the Cats had nothing in the tank.You forgot to mention the 11 rushed behinds, most of which were very blatantly deliberate, and led to a very rapid response by the AFL to change the rule.
IMO wouldve been a very different result if Clarko didnt use that tactic.
Off-season yaaaaaay
Time to make your confessions:
- Players / clubs you should hate, but actually like or admire
- Your own players you should love, but don’t really rate.
And no, I don’t mean like “I admire Fyfe” etc, the obvious ones. If you’re gonna confess, it has to be something you feel a little bit wrong about.
I’ll start: in what appears to be stark contrast to most non-North supporters, I love Brent Harvey. Love watching him play, always have. Think he’s an absolute marvel and a freak. His speed at his age is ridiculous and at full flight he’s a joy to behold as he burns away guys nearly half his age.
Over to you BF
Still time
How can you hate Danger?I dislike these players quite strongly
Patrick Dangerfield
Dan Hannebury
Luke Hodge
Joe Selwood
Joe Daniher
Andrew Mackie
Troy Chaplin
Not sure if this is considered "normal".
As said in previous post, those weren't scoring shots. They weren't even 50/50 opportunitiesi'm not gonna bother going back through the stats of history but if you can find another team that had 9 more scoring shots and lost the GF i'll be more inclined concede your point. because had geelong kicked even at 50% they would have surpassed the magic 16 goal mark.
the only time when a significantly better team loses in a GF is because they don't kick straight. north in 98, hawks in 2012 come to mind.
As said in previous post, those weren't scoring shots. They weren't even 50/50 opportunities
Hawk defenders were taking the ball across the line with impunity
Geelong had 22 scoring shots to Hawthorn's 25
Geelong missed a few goals in the 2nd quarter (and early in the 3rd quarter) but of those, only 50% of them were simple chances.
Mackie, Stokes and others missed shots from the boundary line or 50m out. They were't easy kicks to make.
People went on and on about how Geelong "lost it" because the upset result defied the expert narrative. Easy to explain it away as Geelong kicking 23 behinds. Myth. Really, people would've been better off trying to ascertain why Hawthorn won it. The simple truth s they were dead-eye dicks. Watch the highlights and check out the goals they kicked. They couldn't miss. It was unbelievable… Great day!
stupid callNat fyfe isn't fit to tie gajs boots
Bignosempelli and cripps are the most overrated kids in the comp
Bob murphy looks like moe off the Simpsons
I completely agree. I find his celebrity persona incredibly embarrassing. I hate listening to him speak and think he is an incredibly overrated player and did not deserve the BnF. I hate that he robbed Rough of a BnF in 2013.
I also hate his fashion crap and I don't find him even remotely attractive
I want Carlton back.
That comment is what the thread is all about. Good one.I really can't stand bob Murphy or the bulldogs?
You and Brian Taylor...I know it's footy and we should be analyzing footy/tactics/etc etc but I always notice players aesthetics and their haircuts
I always notice when they get new hair cuts or when they should, or when they do a little tint in them
I can't stand how clean shaven Priddis is!! and I know he got his blonde tints done for the brownlow
Zac Dawsons haircut makes him look like Kramer and he needs to get a looser fitting Guernsey.
Some of the Gold Coast boys have terrible hair cuts, especially the one with the long blonde hair... filthy!! get a haircut ffs you've got the money!!
the sexual objectification of nat fyfe by 45 year old women over social media is disgusting and makes me vomit a little in my mouth! that said Fyfe and Schoey are such specimens (no homosexual connotations intended). I love Schoeys haircut when it's done nicely. Fyfe's hair suits him and he doesn't need to get a hair cut.
Rance has a great haircut
dusty's haircut suits him and makes him look like a bad boy and he should be a model for bad boy clothing, mum reckons its horrible and that Dangerfield is a cutie.
Everytime Dangerfield gets the ball she says oh Dangerfield what a cutie
but when dusty gets it she will say oh that dustin needs to get a new haircut and those tattoos are horrible, she also said swannie has no more room
am I the only one that notices haircuts?
I cheered when Daniel Menzel first did his ACL
. geelong 08 was an insanely good team (in fact the best 1 season team i've ever seen).
Awwwww, I think I'm crying a bit.... Very nice words, thank you...Yes. I think they've done more than enough penance for their sins. The competition needs a strong Carlton. And they have the best team song. By far.
I would also like to thank blackcat (I don't know how to tag posters) for opening my eyes.