He should be in the team even if Shultz is in, they play different roles
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 10
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Sturt can play a similar role, Schultz is partly a lead out forwardHe should be in the team even if Shultz is in, they play different roles
And will love to have the opportunity. I believe he can apply as much pressure which is exciting but his ability to impact the scoreboard like Schultz is unknown and unlikely.Sturt can play a similar role, Schultz is partly a lead out forward
Tom Emmett will have to pick up the other side of the role
If Sam Sturt plays all 22 or 23 games next season, he should kick 30 goals minimum.He should be in the team even if Shultz is in, they play different roles
Nah, Dockers fans get their rocks off by seeing other docker fans suffer. lolGet ****ed for bumping this.
Couldn’t agree more.I posted in the list management thread and got laughed at… but time to throw at the least a year’s extension to Sturt to keep him here till 2025. We’ve put 6 years of development and rehab into him - just watch him have a breakout year next year, then ask for a trade back home.
You read my mindGet ****ed for bumping this.
Amen brother.Need to sign this kid on 2 years with trigger for a 3rd (at least) ASAP or he'll be another Lachie Schultz.
Natural forwards like him don't grow on trees and in a good team he will dominate from minimal touches.
For memory he's only signed until the end of 2024, so you can guarantee VIC clubs will already be getting in his ear.
We're asleep at the wheel on this one (as usual) by not having signed him already beyond 2024. Unfortunately for us non-vic clubs we need to give these talented Vic players probably a year more than they're worth, just to stop the Vic teams from getting in their ear.
While you are correct, the ghost of 2018 haunts this club and it might be better if we just bite the bullet and trade him after he dominates in 2024. Only then will the curse be lifted and the club shall prosper.I posted in the list management thread and got laughed at… but time to throw at the least a year’s extension to Sturt to keep him here till 2025. We’ve put 6 years of development and rehab into him - just watch him have a breakout year next year, then ask for a trade back home.
You're blindStill don't see it.
Are your eyes painted on?Still don't see it.
I would dearly love to see him stay, be signed on for at least three more years.Need to sign this kid on 2 years with trigger for a 3rd (at least) ASAP or he'll be another Lachie Schultz.
Natural forwards like him don't grow on trees and in a good team he will dominate from minimal touches.
For memory he's only signed until the end of 2024, so you can guarantee VIC clubs will already be getting in his ear.
We're asleep at the wheel on this one (as usual) by not having signed him already beyond 2024. Unfortunately for us non-vic clubs we need to give these talented Vic players probably a year more than they're worth, just to stop the Vic teams from getting in their ear.
No current season stats available
No current season stats available
Lol yet another case of someone getting blindly lead by statsI think Sturt had a decent back half of the season and should look at Schultz leaving as a further opportunity to assert himself as an important piece for us, but I think people are getting a tad carried away with the player he is. Fergus Greene literally just got delisted for putting up similar if not better numbers for a worse team: Sam Sturt and Fergus Greene AFL Stats Comparison
2024 is a key year for him. 2023 felt like him having to fight for his AFL career. Now the door is open, and he can potentially be that 30+ goal fwd for us or he can get leapfrogged by players we draft in and once again find his AFL future in the balance.
Sturt is two years younger and a former first round pick whereas Green was a DFA and former 4th round pick.I think Sturt had a decent back half of the season and should look at Schultz leaving as a further opportunity to assert himself as an important piece for us, but I think people are getting a tad carried away with the player he is. Fergus Greene literally just got delisted for putting up similar if not better numbers for a worse team: Sam Sturt and Fergus Greene AFL Stats Comparison
2024 is a key year for him. 2023 felt like him having to fight for his AFL career. Now the door is open, and he can potentially be that 30+ goal fwd for us or he can get leapfrogged by players we draft in and once again find his AFL future in the balance.
Yes? Given the main praise of Sturt is that he is "a natural forward", it should be reflected in basic offensive metrics: goals, goal assists, score involvements. Fergus Greene outperforms him in all 3, and he got delisted.Lol yet another case of someone getting blindly lead by stats
Sure, the youth is why you have more faith in Sturt than Greene. My point is people here are overcorrecting: if what Greene is doing was worth a somewhat harsh delisting, what Sturt is doing isn't worth "drop everything and re-sign him for 4 years this instant or the titanic will sink."S
Sturt is two years younger and a former first round pick whereas Green was a DFA and former 4th round pick.
Also Green only kicked 4 goals in his last 5 games, whereas Sturt kicked 12 in his last 7.