Hurley, Pears and Ryder Vs Goldstein, Hansen and Grima

[TeamHurley]

I have no idea what I am talking aboutQUOTE]

87.50% agree with you KA.

 

[WN123]

Wow you have hit a new low here. Find 1 post of mine where I rate the 3 Roos players against the 3 Essendon. Stupid poll. What the poll should have been was:

Gumby V Hansen - 2 and 3 in the same draft
Grima V Hooker - late draft picks in the same draft
Goldstein V Bellchambers - 21 and 22 year old ruckmen.

In that case the Roos easily.

Why not poll the midfields?

I reckon all you've done is highlight our depth in these positions. Thanks for that.

 

[Kings Army]

Well look who finally decided to show up and eat humble pie.

Name the North melbourne players who play in the same position and are better than them. Has nothing to do with where they were drafted

Are you quoting me??

Pick 7 Ryder V pick 37 Goldstein. Bellchambers rucked on the weekend and Ryder went forward.

Stupid loaded poll from a stupid poster.

 

[Kings Army]

I have no idea what I am talking aboutQUOTE]

87.50% agree with you KA.

We are Essendon - lol - nice 87%
bomber93, BrownPearHookers, CHIEF SMACKAHOE, Daicos Mullets, DapperDon, donbooger, DVD Player, jade_00, jtp23, lamaros, Lance Uppercut, lards, nathan t, NAUGHT5, paddy love, Palmer Stoat, quotemokc, ringo200, RobbyRoy, SA HAWK, scaryness, shad518, Slattery_20, Smyth94, TeamHurley, The Edukator, Tippaz, WN123

 

[TeamHurley]

So you disagree with the results?

 

[DapperDon]

Wow you have hit a new low here. Find 1 post of mine where I rate the 3 Roos players against the 3 Essendon. Stupid poll. What the poll should have been was:

Gumby V Hansen - 2 and 3 in the same draft
Grima V Hooker - late draft picks in the same draft
Goldstein V Bellchambers - 21 and 22 year old ruckmen.

In that case the Roos easily.

This thread is about the 6 players in discussion, if you wish to make a new thread feel free to do so.

 

[TeamHurley]

We are Essendon - lol - nice 87%
QUOTE]

Take out the north and essendon supporters and it's 100% who think the essendon trio is better

 

[WN123]

We are Essendon - lol - nice 87%
QUOTE]

Take out the north and essendon supporters and it's 100% who think the essendon trio is better

Nah - its 9-1... 90% Point remains though. also gotta wonder why more North fans aren't voting. Wouldn't be cause they already know the answer and can't bring themselves to vote that way would it.

 

[TeamHurley]

Nah - its 9-1... 90% Point remains though. also gotta wonder why more North fans aren't voting. Wouldn't be cause they already know the answer and can't bring themselves to vote that way would it.

Could be because there is just not really that many of them.

 

[Kings Army]

This thread is about the 6 players in discussion, if you wish to make a new thread feel free to do so.

It is called glory hunting when a poll has clear bais towards a team you support. I could start a poll on Carey V Lucas - knowing that Carey was miles better. Then sit back and gloat about how good Carey is. Again a stupid poll by a stupid poster.

 

[TeamHurley]

It is called glory hunting when a poll has clear bais towards a team you support. I could start a poll on Carey V Lucas - knowing that Carey was miles better. Then sit back and gloat about how good Carey is. Again a stupid poll by a stupid poster.

This thread isn't about Carey V Lucas. If you want to talk about that start another poll.

 

[ThePuppetMaster]

troy davis, max gawn and tom mcdonald

hands down

...

 

[Kings Army]

This thread isn't about Carey V Lucas. If you want to talk about that start another poll.

No worries glory hunter. - I would like it to be close so can you pick 1 player in the history of Essendon that was the equal too or a better player than Carey?

 

[Slattery_20]

Here's a thought Kings, maybe if you didn't spend 3/4 of your time on this site trolling Essendon posters, maybe they wouldn't troll you back?
Just a thought.

 

[THRILLHO]

All of Essendon's trio are ahead of North's trio but it isnt as clear cut as some are making it out to be. Goldstein has to do it on his own, Ryder has Hille, a very underrated ruckman, to share duties with; Grima is very good but has been injured, didnt play in round 1 and the ball was constantly in the forward line on Saturday and; Hurley has shown more than Hansen but I've seen some very good signs from Lachie.

There's one main difference between Hurley and Lachie. It's confidence. You see Hurley and he's got a bit of swagger and a bit of mongrel, Lachie doesnt have that and it's to the detriment of his game. We desperately need Duck down at the club to tutor him, not up on the GC taking shots at campaigner.

 

[Slattery_20]

Goldstein has to do it on his own, Ryder has Hille, a very underrated ruckman, to share duties with

Really?

Hille & Belly played about 8 games combined in 2009, Ryder was very definitely one-out. 2010 we had 2 rucks almost every week.
Goldstein couldn't have played that many wihtout McIntosh right next to him. McIntosh barely missed a game the last 2 years.

 

[DVD Player]

We are Essendon - lol - nice 87%
bomber93, BrownPearHookers, CHIEF SMACKAHOE, Daicos Mullets, DapperDon, donbooger, DVD Player, jade_00, jtp23, lamaros, Lance Uppercut, lards, nathan t, NAUGHT5, paddy love, Palmer Stoat, quotemokc, ringo200, RobbyRoy, SA HAWK, scaryness, shad518, Slattery_20, Smyth94, TeamHurley, The Edukator, Tippaz, WN123

Why would you go to such an effort in an attempt to prove someone over the internet incorrect?

 

[Kings Army]

Why would you go to such an effort in an attempt to prove someone over the internet incorrect?

Such effort? - 10 seconds to copy and paste?

 

[Lance Uppercut]

Here's a thought Kings, maybe if you didn't spend 3/4 of your time on this site trolling Essendon posters, maybe they wouldn't troll you back?
Just a thought.

yeah it's not rocket science

 

[DVD Player]

Such effort? - 10 seconds to copy and paste?

And bolding the individual user-names...

 

[Wild Bill]

if we were judging right now
ryder>goldy
grima>pears
hurley>hansen

essendon trio win 2-1, but i wouldnt be surprised to see goldy go past ryder, revisit this poll in 3 years time

3 years on and the North trio lead.

Goldy is clearly better than Ryder - 2 AA squad noms and last year runner up in the Roos B&F. Ryder keeps teasing but still lacks consistancy.

Hurley and Hansen are a nil all draw. Both being switched back and both looking solid.

Grima is better than Pears who can't get a game at essendon. Grima has started the year very well and is the most underrated player on our list.

2-0 points win to the Roos.

 

[Ashton Agar]

3 years on and the North trio lead.

Goldy is clearly better than Ryder - 2 AA squad noms and last year runner up in the Roos B&F. Ryder keeps teasing but still lacks consistancy.

Hurley and Hansen are a nil all draw. Both being switched back and both looking solid.

Grima is better than Pears who can't get a game at essendon. Grima has started the year very well and is the most underrated player on our list.

2-0 points win to the Roos.

Hurley > Hansen

 

[Wild Bill]

Hurley > Hansen

Rubbish.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/lachie-hansen-vs-michael-hurley.1032466/

Their stats are very similar and there is nothing between them.

 

[JD11]

Bizarre bump. How obsessed?

 

[Wild Bill]

Bizarre bump. How obsessed?

"Revist poll in 3 years". 3 years last week.

Time to judge:
2-0 - Roos