So braveWill admit was going to post that......Thought the board might go into meltdown if I did.
At least someone had the guts
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So braveWill admit was going to post that......Thought the board might go into meltdown if I did.
At least someone had the guts
It's sometimes too easy.
Look at that, the world goes on.Poor form from you in this thread. Your avatar is suddenly very fitting.
The teen also faces charges of assault, threats to kill, trespass and theft of electronics - a total of 39 charges from four separate incidents.
Precious much?
Thanks babe.Ah yes, the defence of the moron. When someone calls you out on being an utter *******, they are instantly 'precious' or 'not in the real world' or whatever else you can say in an attempt to make it look like they have no idea.
If finding your ridiculous comments in this thread abhorrent is precious then I'm happy to be precious
Thanks babe.
'Prominent' AFL Posters brother charged with five counts of ridiculous posting
Horrific reporting.
Journo should be sacked for trying glorify this story with a connection to AFL.
Sorry Majak.Haven't you seen, pantskyle is just too edgy to care, he's such a top troll
I knew it wasn't him when it indicated it was a brother of a good footballer.By the way, Ajak Daw can only be about 8 or 9 at the moment, if that, so that'll rule out the Daw name being sensationally muckraked again.
I knew it wasn't him when it indicated it was a brother of a good footballer.
Prominent is very different to good. Matt Priddis is a prominent footballer.
Not only is this pathetic because the Herald Scum is attempting to sully the name of an AFL player (which, given the anonymity involved, is actually tarnishing the name of players, in general), but such a story should warrant being reported in and of itself; why must a story about the rape of a teenage girl be linked to the AFL to be considered relevant? I'd like to think that no one is of the opinion that they wouldn't care if it wasn't "AFL related", but the implication that this is the case from the HScum is highly condescending and downright disgusting.
Typical s**t journo speak. Can't tell you but will drop little hints. Use of the word prominent denotes that it isn't a star or one of the Melbourne medias favorite little sensible Labor supporters but is someone highly visible. ruddy atrocious.
I thought usually they'll refer to any random AFL player as "star". How often do you see a headline "Former AFL star in strife over [drugs/domestic assault/dodgy property deal etc]" and when you read the article it turns out the "star" played three games a decade ago?