Will still damage his reputation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Call me synical, but when something surfaces for the first time 27 years later when the alleged offender obtain an extremely high public profile, it general says to me one of two things, either they want to destroy their career or they want money.
Abbott was charged with indecent assault in 1978Will still damage his reputation.
A 27-year-old court case in which Health Minister Tony Abbott was charged with indecent assault is about to be revived.
The case involved an allegation that Mr Abbott, then a 20-year-old student leader in the heady days of campus politics, groped a woman activist on stage before an audience of 200.
If the pro coalition media or the coalition try to use this against Shorten
since the police has ruled no further action is being taken , shorten should go after them
Call me synical, but when something surfaces for the first time 27 years later when the alleged offender obtain an extremely high public profile, it general says to me one of two things, either they want to destroy their career or they want money.
Will still damage his reputation.
Why? The allegations have no currency whatsoever. Any person repeating the allegation would be a self-admitting dickhead and the collective memory of the great Australian Public, with all due respect to goldfish, is like that of a goldfish.
No brainer. He has made it clear he fully co-operated with police, they do not intend charging him, he states on the record his innocence, the media ask a whole heap of stupid questions and the caravan now moves on.Surprised he decided to make that statement. Cannot see the net gain for him in doing so. Maybe letting of some steam.
Same could have been communicated without his name being mentioned and the caravan would have moved on. His decision.No brainer. He has made it clear he fully co-operated with police, they do not intend charging him, he states on the record his innocence, the media ask a whole heap of stupid questions and the caravan now moves on.
How would an "unnamed senior ALP figure" say "I have fully co-operated with police etc" and not be laughed about?Same could have been communicated without his name being mentioned and the caravan would have moved on. His decision.
Not for 'The Australian' though, they have asked for the other person to comment.No brainer. He has made it clear he fully co-operated with police, they do not intend charging him, he states on the record his innocence, the media ask a whole heap of stupid questions and the caravan now moves on.
It shows how desperate this newsltd/abbott coalition isNot for 'The Australian' though, they have asked for the other person to comment.
I don't bother reading Murdoch press and haven't for many years.It shows how desperate this newsltd/abbott coalition is
They defended Abbott when he lied about the wall punching incident , in fact they smeared the victim
Surprised he decided to make that statement. Cannot see the net gain for him in doing so. Maybe letting of some steam.
I'm not denying that things often take time to come out, what I am referring to is how it just happens to coincide with when he took over as ALP leader is a bit perculiar.Sorry you cant assume that. Too many times things come out later. people originally too afraid or feel self guilt/shame. Look at the kids molested by priests etc. Its not about money. Its about help, recognition & justice. Kids dont often know how to deal with such issues, it comes out later as teenagers & young adults. It ends in suicide more often than most people appreciate. We see then in the Hospital/medical system, its awful.
I'm not denying that things often take time to come out, what I am referring to is how it just happens to coincide with when he took over as ALP leader is a bit perculiar.
I don't think that it has anything to do with him taking a while to become leader.Perhaps Gillard knew about it and wanted revenge, perhaps all of Labor knew and that's why he was a powerful backroom figure and not the leader for so long?
100% it was to stay ahead of the " curve "Surprised he decided to make that statement. Cannot see the net gain for him in doing so. Maybe letting of some steam.
If it happened, I don't think I'd blame them for either of those motivations.
There is no right to anonymity is there?
For the complainant there is, even without a criminal proceeding as I recall. For the accused there isn't necessarily, although high-profile people accused of crimes such as these often aren't named in the media. A certain jockey comes to mind.
No brainer. He has made it clear he fully co-operated with police, they do not intend charging him, he states on the record his innocence, the media ask a whole heap of stupid questions and the caravan now moves on.