Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll restrict myself to saying how ironic it is that to have a large endowment is considered desirable, yet a similarly proportioned pudendum is frowned upon. Being versatile, I can cope with all comers.skilts you need to lend some respectability to this thread with some wanton references to pudenda
yes, far from us to be gratuitous. we will leave that to emma alberici's new career.I'll restrict myself to saying how ironic it is that to have a large endowment is considered desirable, yet a similarly proportioned pudendum is frowned upon. Being versatile, I can cope with all comers.
If I've got anything to do with it, it does so become. Neither negative nor positive, it just the way things are going to be.yes, far from us to be gratuitous. we will leave that to emma alberici's new career.
skilts what happens when you marry said large endowment to a receptacle. does the receptacle then become of similar proportion, and, is this negative, or just symmetry?
The public get no more say in how social welfare, medicare or public transport dollars are spent than they do on how ABC dollars are spent.Simple. There's overwhelming support for all those things, on all sides of the political divide. Our society may impose manditory tax but through democratic process people get a say in how those dollars are spent. The ABC has managed to alienate large sections of the community through its bias and poor service. Thats why there's a debate on its ungoing funding and future.
The majority of Australians who don't vote for Labor or The Greens.
In the 1998 Federal Election, Beasley secured more votes that Howard in the "GST Election", yet despite the fact that the majority of Australian's vote against the GST, it got bought in.Should I even bother asking you to provide evidence for that?
The public get no more say in how social welfare, medicare or public transport dollars are spent than they do on how ABC dollars are spent.
If there's a popular groundswell of community support or angst over how public moneys are spent, then there's a corresponding political imperative to deal with it (one way or another) thats inversely related to the size of the demographic calling for the change.
So "Seems like public broadcaster funding will be fine!" is the inverse corollary??If there's a popular groundswell of community support or angst over how public moneys are spent, then there's a corresponding political imperative to deal with it (one way or another) thats inversely related to the size of the demographic calling for the change.
Kudos to the ABC for supporting Mental Health this week and also a great variety program tonight - Mentalas.
The problem is, a few loners on a talkboard doesn't constitute a groundswell. Not even a groundripple.
Do they?All Liberal voters hate the ABC?
Is this a serious question?Do they?
I used to be a hardcore liberal voter. For many, many years.In other words, people who vote for the liberal party don't count.
Only votes for Labor or the Greens represent true democracy.
ABC beat Ten last year. Their 'falling ratings' is equivalent to people who say the earth has cooled since 2008, despite most of the years after 2008 being hotter than before 2008.Good old Floor Pie logic. It's better than the rest despite falling ratings so it mus t not mean people are critical and less satisfied of it.
Hundreds? WTF?It's just a TV station mate. We have hundreds of them in Australia, don't need a taxpayer funded one.
No, there's a debate because the Coalition are cutting everything. Despite getting voted in on a promise to not cut everything, including specific things like the ABC & SBS.Is there a sizeable debate on the ABC's future, or isn't there?
Yes. Because a large section of the community is alienated by the ABC's bias.
Oh, hang on. No need to answer that. ^ I see your confidence comes from ignorance.And what was that Muslim extremist doing on our TV last night? He is living in our country with not one speck of loyalty to our nation. If an extreme anti-Islam spokesperson made similar, outrageous claims the whole twitterati, ABC presenters and Fairfax press would explode with outrage. The ABC board is a joke for giving this swine a platform, Emma only just managed to pull it back.
Oh crap. Have we been debating with anyone who's actually worth debating?It is impressive they managed to find someone so nuts even someone on the ABC wouldn't accept their views. What next, maybe they'll ask some of their own, like Walid Aly similar questions....I wonder if they'll hold him to a similar standard when he deflects such questions.
I used to be a hardcore liberal voter. For many, many years.
Didn't stop me from loving the ABC.
Hundreds? WTF?
Of course some of those are basically the same station too, and the community stations will soon to be defunct (unless he's extended Turnbull's logic and thinks that because everyone carries a camera in their pocket, we have millions of TV stations...). Let's be generous and assume he meant 'channels' and therefore he thinks the ABC is equally as important as the 'hundreds of stations' he sees when he looks at his Foxtel guide and notices three numbers in front of the channel names.Well spotted.
Thanks to the aggregation that happened under Hawke, we now have the ABC, SBS, NITV, Imparja, Prime, Win, Southern Cross Ten, Southern Cross (FNQ/NT/Outback), GWN, Satellite services plus Seven, Nine, Ten and Foxtel.
It's really less than 20.
The National Broadcaster is resigned and adjusting to the cuts already declared but are apparently dreading the cuts that are yet to come.