Mega Thread Trade/Free Agency Open Discussion - RFC Forum

[fargothegreat]

Weren't we linked to Young by C4 earlier in the year? Maybe we're going for both?

 

[fargothegreat]

FYI I like Moore. A classy player who just needs to be given a starting position in a midfield to give him the confidence to find a bit more ball

 

[Rodney Dangerfield]

It's not just about big names, but in my opinion Moore is a waste of a spot on our list. Has been at Port for 5 years and has made zero impact. We've got enough middle of the road triers. We need some genuine class.

know what you're saying.
He does have a bit of class but he has had a pretty harsh run not unlike his brother.
That is a genuine concern for sure.

 

[Tiger_Of_Old]

Weren't we linked to Young by C4 earlier in the year? Maybe we're going for both?

More Port.lol
Maybe thats a sign.

 

[Wacky Tiger]

Young? He is half way through his career. Will turn 25 next year.

Young is turning 23 in December. Moore is turning 25 next May

 

[fargothegreat]

I'd take both for a second round pick

 

["The Roar Is Back"]

Getting Miles has allowed Lids to play more outside , getting Moore and Townsend should permit Cotchin to spend more time outside.

 

[Gosha]

View attachment 183339

We bring up another 100 pages of sh!t.....

Solid run rate though.

Number 9 draft pick
Yazz no 6 draft pick

All that is missing is Jack Watts.

 

[UpTheGuts]

This Andrew Moore response reminds me a lot of when we traded Collins for Grigg...

Have some faith in the club guys. Seriously this is just ridiculous by you lot.

And Miles was a list clogger

 

[Rodney Dangerfield]

Geez I bloody hope that new account user named mandrew who told us about Moore coming to the tigers last night wasn't him!
if so.......... eh welcome to tigerland this is how we roll.

 

[rfctiger90]

Young? He is half way through his career. Will turn 25 next year.

Yeah well whatever you consider young, probably better than the guy we draft at that pick (50-60) will ever be and can provide instant depth if we get a harsh injury run.

 

[Varicho]

And Miles was a list clogger

Miles was initially a rookie that came good, no risk. Moore will need to be traded for and will take a spot on the list.

Club obviously knows we need quality, hence going hard for Treloar. This just seems like a very average compromise.

 

[Michaels]

Plan B = moneyball theory

 

[Tiger_Of_Old]

Geez I bloody hope that new account user named mandrew who told us about Moore coming to the tigers last night wasn't him!
if so.......... eh welcome to tigerland this is how we roll.

Coming to Tigerland for an interview perhaps.
Get a free bithday cake and spend the night with Dusty.

 

[captain cotch 9]

 

[Calcium Man]

And Miles was a list clogger

Miles was 21 and Grigg was 22. Moore will be 25.

 

[bigstyletiger]

Is Moore even an inside mid. I thought he was a half back/utility type player. Poor mans B Goddard type.

 

[Ancient Tiger]

Is Moore even an inside mid. I thought he was a half back/utility type player. Poor mans B Goddard type.

I think you are correct. Anyway, we will transform him into an inside mid if he comes to us as we can't play him half back because every junior player we have has to go there to learn how to play defence!

 

[rfctiger90]

Miles was initially a rookie that came good, no risk. Moore will need to be traded for and will take a spot on the list.

Club obviously knows we need quality, hence going hard for Treloar. This just seems like a very average compromise.

Will he be better than the guy we draft at 60? Yes. Therefore he's cheap and good to have as a back up. No one is suggesting he comes in and plays 23 games. He'll take a spot on our list but we're not short on spots after our retirements and delistings. Realistically he'll just take Arnott's spot. Debatable whether he's better than him or not but worst case scenario it's a no gain.

 

[Rodney Dangerfield]

Will he be better than the guy we draft at 60? Yes. Therefore he's cheap and good to have as a back up. No one is suggesting he comes in and plays 23 games. He'll take a spot on our list but we're not short on spots after our retirements and delistings. Realistically he'll just take Arnott's spot. Debatable whether he's better than him or not but worst case scenario it's a no gain.

No debate there whatsoever imo

 

[Varicho]

Will he be better than the guy we draft at 60? Yes. Therefore he's cheap and good to have as a back up. No one is suggesting he comes in and plays 23 games. He'll take a spot on our list but we're not short on spots after our retirements and delistings. Realistically he'll just take Arnott's spot. Debatable whether he's better than him or not but worst case scenario it's a no gain.

Is he going to make us a top 4 side? Then what's the point.

 

[rfctiger90]

Is he going to make us a top 4 side? Then what's the point.

Because if Miles goes down and Matt Thomas goes down then we're (even more) ****ed.

That's the point.

There's 44 blokes on a list. Not every one of them can be a superstar who will drag us into the top 4.

 

[Tiger Toffee]

Seriously if you are going after a port fringe mid it's Young >>>Moore

LOL, Moore has better numbers, shits all over Young

This Andrew Moore response reminds me a lot of when we traded Collins for Grigg...

Have some faith in the club guys. Seriously this is just ridiculous by you lot.

Some posters wont be happy unless we recruit 5/6 big names.

 

[Squibbs]

Is he going to make us a top 4 side? Then what's the point.

You don't chase quality players with a third round draft pick. He's there as mature depth and would improve our 20-30th best players on the team. The club knows best, they spend hours on this kind of shit.

 

[Magic17]

You don't chase quality players with a third round draft pick. He's there as mature depth and would improve our 20-30th best players on the team. The club knows best, they spend hours on this kind of shit.

What!!!... you sayin' the club knows better than BF posters... you must be a troll.