Floor Pie
Cancelled
- May 13, 2014
- 2,580
- 2,404
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
What the heck is wrong with a woman or a man, being able to dress as they wish, and live as they wish, without the fear of being raped??This woman disagrees with you.
http://returnofqueens.com/womens-responsibility-in-preventing-rape/
Yet here that is what you are telling tesseract. You lead him and tell him what his views should be which are also your own. You say women and men must do things to reduce rape, then say women should be able to dress in a way society dictates. If they dress in a sexually promiscuous manner for example deliberately to attract attention and also act in a way while out that invites or suggests that they are interested in engaging in sexual behaviours they should be held in no way responsible for their actions?
Yet you directly contradict this claim as soon as you say women and men should be doing things to reduce rape. Wouldn't not going out getting blind drunk, dressing slutty, leading on males be good examples of such behaviour to reduce rape. Seems you are happy to have your cake and eat it too.
Maybe a woman wouldn't have been 'raped' in your eyes and definition of it if she had taken measures to reduce the fact before hand. Therefore it seems you are willing to utilise the all are equal and some are more equal argument to say men and women should reduce the risks of rape and yet then excuse their behaviours which exacerbate the likelihood of rape happening.
I'm sorry, there is nothing I, you, or anyone can do, that justifies being raped...
If a person says no, or tries to disengage, or you know they are in no state to be aware of anything and you are and continue, then it's rape.
Reducing rape means finding ways to decrease the activieties of rapists, not restrict our civil liberties.