- Feb 25, 2013
- 51,218
- 58,275
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
don't bring Brady into thisI'm not sure what's worse to labor thru....Brady vs manning debates or power vs crows debates.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
don't bring Brady into thisI'm not sure what's worse to labor thru....Brady vs manning debates or power vs crows debates.
He's inextricably attached to the manning discussion. When you talk about about one of the best qb's ever you're gonna have to draw parrallels with his peer(s) who also are one of the greatest ever. Like when you argue one of Elway Marino or Montana you're gonna have to include the others into it.don't bring Brady into this
We're not really arguing if he's the greatest, well, if anything Royals is arguing that he's the greatestHe's inextricably attached to the manning discussion. When you talk about about one of the best qb's ever you're gonna have to draw parrallels with his peer(s) who also are one of the greatest ever. Like when you argue one of Elway Marino or Montana you're gonna have to include the others into it.
Marino is the greatest.We're not really arguing if he's the greatest, well, if anything Royals is arguing that he's the greatest
Fair callMarino is the greatest.
No, it's the right callFair call
It's not really a debate though is it... One has regular season stats, the other has the rings.He's inextricably attached to the manning discussion. When you talk about about one of the best qb's ever you're gonna have to draw parrallels with his peer(s) who also are one of the greatest ever. Like when you argue one of Elway Marino or Montana you're gonna have to include the others into it.
One has had good teams and coach, the other hasn't.It's not really a debate though is it... One has regular season stats, the other has the rings.
Not a fan of Tony Dungy and his "quiet strength"?One has had good teams and coach, the other hasn't.
Tony Dungy was decent, not on Belicheick's levelNot a fan of Tony Dungy and his "quiet strength"?
You are right about John Fox. Mind you, if the media is to be believed Manning is the HC and OC anyway.
It's hard to argue that any coach is on BB's level. TB12 and BB are an interesting mix where I honestly believe the drive and ambition of each has made the other better at their job. It's the sporting equivalent of a perfect marriage.Tony Dungy was decent, not on Belicheick's level
but don't get me started on old mate Foxy
Which Manning you talking about. In my time Montana is the best but presently Brady has done well with sometimes average offensive players.I'm not sure what's worse to labor thru....Brady vs manning debates or power vs crows debates.
I'm sorry to be so belligerent on this topic but when it comes to greatest ever qb and rb, the answer is Marino and sanders and that's the end. But I appreciate people have their legitimate reasons for others.Which Manning you talking about. In my time Montana is the best but presently Brady has done well with sometimes average offensive players.
Elway and Davis thxI'm sorry to be so belligerent on this topic but when it comes to greatest ever qb and rb, the answer is Marino and sanders and that's the end. But I appreciate people have their legitimate reasons for others.
2006 was the only season Brady had a deplorable #1. Reche Caldwell strangely enough, made some plays.It's not the rings that makes Brady better than Manning. It's the clutch factor and working with a revolving door of average receivers.
I'm not sure what's worse to labor thru....Brady vs manning debates or power vs crows debates.
And he managed a big one against the #1 Chargers2006 was the only season Brady had a deplorable #1. Reche Caldwell strangely enough, made some plays.
And he managed a big one against the #1 Chargers
Compared to the WRs Manning has had at Colts and Broncos......huge difference.2006 was the only season Brady had a deplorable #1. Reche Caldwell strangely enough, made some plays.
Brady's always had at least one dependable guy in his WR corp. It's typically been the slot receiver funnily enough. I guess it's the way Belichick likes to construct his team when one considers the Erhardt-Perkins system the team runs. Deion Branch, Troy Brown and David Patten were a large reason why the Patriots had success during Brady's early years. When you needed a play, one of them (generally Brown) picked up the required yards. What Brady had was a decent run game and RBs who could catch and run out of the backfield.
The thing with the Patriots is the big down the field threat isn't something that necessarily fits their game plan. Belichick likes high percentage throws that minimise the risk of turnovers but also put the receivers in a position to exploit the coverages. There was a big debate as to whether to not the Patriots stuffed the pick when they passed over Des Bryant in favour of Devin McCourty (I think they got it right). I'm not sure Bryant is bright enough to pick up the requirements of the Patriots system. It's why guys like college QB Minitron, guys with a high football IQ appear to flourish with Brady despite the lack of a big, household name. It's also a large reason why Gronk is unstoppable. He sees coverages and adjusts his routes to what Brady sees.
So yeah, I can see why people would say he's had an average group because the names aren't they but maybe, just maybe, they were guys who were right for the system. There's also the fact that Tom Brady is ******* awesome and improves everyone who plays with him.