Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Heres the thing, its called trading - or an exchange. We decide what we want to give/receive as do you.
We dont make the call on what you want for Clark and you dont make the call on what we offer - hence a trade.
So dont come on this board telling us that our business practices are poor
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
And how exactly has your club done that, given that they have made NO OFFER for him?
No, and that's fine, but you've made NO OFFER.
Why? They are. Making NO OFFER for a bloke you're chasing is poor practice. If GWS nab him in the PSD, we get compensated, and you'd not get the player you actively chased, but for some bizarre reason made NO OFFER for.
I agree re trading firmly, etc... but this is beyond that. Not sure if you got it, but guys your club has made NO OFFER for him. That is NOT being firm, that's poor business practice.
And how exactly has your club done that, given that they have made NO OFFER for him?
No, and that's fine, but you've made NO OFFER.
Why? They are. Making NO OFFER for a bloke you're chasing is poor practice. If GWS nab him in the PSD, we get compensated, and you'd not get the player you actively chased, but for some bizarre reason made NO OFFER for.
I agree re trading firmly, etc... but this is beyond that. Not sure if you got it, but guys your club has made NO OFFER for him. That is NOT being firm, that's poor business practice.
Why? They are. Making NO OFFER for a bloke you're chasing is poor practice. If GWS nab him in the PSD, we get compensated, and you'd not get the player you actively chased, but for some bizarre reason made NO OFFER for.
I agree re trading firmly, etc... but this is beyond that. Not sure if you got it, but guys your club has made NO OFFER for him. That is NOT being firm, that's poor business practice.
And how exactly has your club done that, given that they have made NO OFFER for him?
No, and that's fine, but you've made NO OFFER.
Why? They are. Making NO OFFER for a bloke you're chasing is poor practice. If GWS nab him in the PSD, we get compensated, and you'd not get the player you actively chased, but for some bizarre reason made NO OFFER for.
I agree re trading firmly, etc... but this is beyond that. Not sure if you got it, but guys your club has made NO OFFER for him. That is NOT being firm, that's poor business practice.
Not sure if anyone's mentioned it already (can't really be arsed to check) but if you get a chance you should contrast the perceived trade value of Mitchy thrown up by Lions supporters on this thread with some of the comments made in the "Roster Watch - Mitch Clark" thread on their board. Some real vitriol there, and not all linked to his decision to leave.
It is, of course, entirely possible that two different Brisbane fans may have different views of Clark's value.
Personally, I think he's a lazy waste of space, but I suspect he may not have been giving his all in the second half of the season. He may well have had his mind in Fremantle for some time.
It would seem that Freo and Clark's management are in constant communication. I reckon Clark told them some time ago that he would veto any trade deal that wasn't to the Dockers. No wonder Bond is playing it cool. It's easy to call your poker opponent's bluff when you've got a mate reading his cards over his shoulder.
Fremantle are totally entitled to try and leverage their position of strength to get the best possible deal for the club. But I do think it starts to get a little dodgy when Clark is drawing a salary from the Brisbane football club, while seemingly doing everything he can to undermine their interests.
When Tarrant left us last year there was no sympathy for Freo, AFL is just like any other business, politics, and life, brutal.
Mellington will be in the forward line next year, no question.Balla will be rotated to keep him fresh, he is very good in bursts.
Will be interesting to see if Walters is in our plans, or will be discarded.
??? Knew that, changes nothing... my point is that this kind of business practice is poor, and will hurt you in future trading. How do you think other clubs will respond to this?
"Fremantle are stubborn at trading, so we'll have to play hard-ball with them right back to get a fair deal."
Will make trading with your club very difficult going ahead. The best way is to be firm, but fair.
I think they will offer pick 20 and maybe a 2nd or 3rd round pick. We need pick 16 to try and lure Goddard to Freo, that's they rumours anyway, pick 16 and two players for Goddard, it's probably a load of crap but jeez we can dream can't we?
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/sport/a/-/sport/10469036/clark-determined-to-seal-freo-deal/
"The Lions denied reports Fremantle had offered them national draft picks No.16 and No.20, but did say they had been offered the No.16 choice."
Just to clarify things.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/sport/a/-/sport/10469036/clark-determined-to-seal-freo-deal/
And how exactly has your club done that, given that they have made NO OFFER for him?
No, and that's fine, but you've made NO OFFER.
Why? They are. Making NO OFFER for a bloke you're chasing is poor practice. If GWS nab him in the PSD, we get compensated, and you'd not get the player you actively chased, but for some bizarre reason made NO OFFER for.
I agree re trading firmly, etc... but this is beyond that. Not sure if you got it, but guys your club has made NO OFFER for him. That is NOT being firm, that's poor business practice.
Do you have a source that confirms we have made no offer? ...
Reading between the lines, it's possible (probable) that we have offered one of those picks and Brisbane aren't prepared to accept that offer.
I don't know, but personally, based on your comments, I'd like to see a source that confirms we have made no offer at all as yet.
Do you have any source for this?
...
You would think if they were offering nothing, they would have said Not Interested and walked away by now.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/sport/a/-/sport/10469036/clark-determined-to-seal-freo-deal/
"The Lions denied reports Fremantle had offered them national draft picks No.16 and No.20, but did say they had been offered the No.16 choice."
Just to clarify things.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/sport/a/-/sport/10469036/clark-determined-to-seal-freo-deal/
He is definitely worth more than Clark though, who is apparently worth two top twenty picks according to some on this board.
Which means a lot for us because we're getting Clark as a forward.
Seriously, he's a shit forward. PSD or bust. This delusion of Moo's that we'll get 90 goals out of Clark + Pavlich is the same shit I read about the Tarrant trade. It's only possible if both have their best seasons on record.
You forced that situation by asking a ridiculous price for him.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/sport/a/-/sport/10469036/clark-determined-to-seal-freo-deal/
"The Lions denied reports Fremantle had offered them national draft picks No.16 and No.20, but did say they had been offered the No.16 choice."
Just to clarify things.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/sport/a/-/sport/10469036/clark-determined-to-seal-freo-deal/
Yoo hoo.... Duritz, are you there????
Yoo hoo.... Duritz, are you there????
Duritz??
Duritz????
Nah.... didn't think so.![]()