No we won't.
We would keep pick 2 for young Norwood star James Aish.
Good to hear.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

No we won't.
We would keep pick 2 for young Norwood star James Aish.
Maybe this could work....
Vince to Melbourne
Polec & pick 25 to the Crows
Pick 20 and Lyons the Lions
Adelaide gains: Polec and Pick 25 (from Brisbane)
Brisbane gains: Pick 20 and pick Lyons
Melbourne gains: Vince
Leave 25 out of it and send Lyons to Melbourne.
I don't think pick 20 for Polec would get the deal done.
Plus, basically Polec and pick 36 for Vince and Lyons isn't going to cut it. Not even close.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
If we do end up with Grant, we'll need to get him some kind of a cure for this allergy to putting on bulk.
Maybe this could work....
Vince to Melbourne
Polec & pick 25 to the Crows
Pick 20 and Lyons the Lions
Adelaide gains: Polec and Pick 25 (from Brisbane)
Brisbane gains: Pick 20 and pick Lyons
Melbourne gains: Vince
Remember you're outbidding Port who won't offer pick 13. IMO pick 20 is paying overs for Vince who's played his best footy and is going to a developing side.
Personally, I'd take it.
Not convinced we have genuine interest in Lyons, though. Seems more like Adelaide BF fans want to get rid of him.
Fair enough and we go our separate ways.
I doubt we would be willing to pay pick 20 for Polec. If you were willing to upgrade pick 25 to pick 20 and accept a lower ranked player yes but pick 20 outright, no chance.
Lyons was just a name.
You could select from any a number of players: Wright, Mackay, Lyons, Petrenko, A. Riley or Martin. But IMO, Lyons offers the most value as he will be a very good inside midfielder and we have a larger number of that type.
How can you say that?
What are Adelaide posturing for then? Are they going to use pick 20 in the draft or are they trying to trump Port to get Polec?
Pick 20 is a second round pick that will become pick 22 once compensation is awarded for FA. I think this is a very fair price to pay for Polec.
Maybe this could work....
Vince to Melbourne
Polec & pick 25 to the Crows
Pick 20 and Lyons the Lions
Adelaide gains: Polec and Pick 25 (from Brisbane)
Brisbane gains: Pick 20 and pick Lyons
Melbourne gains: Vince
I agree, but I'm not convinced we're interested in any of them, or that any of them would agree to be traded to Brisbane for that matter. I think we might be talking about players with Adelaide to try and up the Power's offer.
I quite like Lyons. He seems like he could be a genuine extractor, and maybe useful in the forwardline as well. Players have to be coaxed into coming to Brisbane, though, and I don't think he's worth the three year deal at good money we generally have to pony up to get players from other clubs.
Trading is all risk reward. You don't know how the player you are getting will turn out, especially with drafting and recruiting in experienced players. Polec may turn into a very good player but his current trajectory may follow the same trends he's demonstrating in Brisbane. With all due respect to him, not much. We don't know that, that's why it's a risk.
Saying that, if you suggest Polec is worth pick 20 (to become 22) doesn't that then devalue a player like Vince? Shouldn't his value become a higher commodity based on the known factor?
Here's a curly one.
You're Rob Kerr and GWS want Jack Redden to upgrade our pick #7 to pick #1.
Would you do it?
I think I might.
Here's a curly one.
You're Rob Kerr and GWS want Jack Redden to upgrade our pick #7 to pick #1.
Would you do it?
I think I might.
Here's a curly one.
You're Rob Kerr and GWS want Jack Redden to upgrade our pick #7 to pick #1.
Would you do it?
I think I might.
I would in a heartbeat. Redden is a good solid player,but he's never gonna be an A-grader or star midfielder. Tackles like a champ and uses the ball ok,but fairly easily replaced if we're being honest. I'll take the hulking full forward thank youHere's a curly one.
You're Rob Kerr and GWS want Jack Redden to upgrade our pick #7 to pick #1.
Would you do it?
I think I might.
Here's a curly one.
You're Rob Kerr and GWS want Jack Redden to upgrade our pick #7 to pick #1.
Would you do it?
I think I might.
I think Grant would offer a point of difference in our forward half and be a good upgrade on Bewick and others battling for that fourth/third forward role. I reckon he cops a bad wrap, and whilst he hasn't been the most consistent performer, he is an early draft pick and often been unable to get a decent match-up due to the Dogs small forward line, hence stagnating his development.At first, I was interesting in exploring Grant as an option. But unless we do think we can turn him into a half back flanker to replace Yeo, then I'm no longer that keen. I don't really see Staker/McGuane as being competition for him - they are more like KPPs than running types. However, I think we've got good coverage with Bewick, Zorko, Hanley, Mayes etc - our runners who play forward of centre roles and who are regulars in our best 22. We also rest inside mids up forward (Rockliff, Redden, Rich etc) and if Green improves his engine, he is also an option to get up field more.
I'm not putting Paparone into that mix (not without seeing a bit more) but clearly we've recruited him to play that sort of linking role too.
I tend to think that he's a better footballer than people give him credit for but, like you say, he's not the best fit for our squad.
I'm becoming more interested in Kane Lucas as a trade option.
