Tiger_Of_Old
🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆
That is true.Pia trumps all though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is true.Pia trumps all though.
Possibly. Also, we only had 3 recruiters. Our recruiting has improved a lot since we went from 1 to 3. Hopefully 3 to 4 will see another jump. Wouldn't mind us getting another one at some stage to look after the 2 non-footy states.
There you go RFC_Official tigs is putting in his resume for a recruiting position I'm sure he'll happily move to sunny Queensland to watch football.
I have worked with Luke previously and can confirm he is as professional and prudent as you can possibly get.
He will be looking after the state league competitions and scouting at his new club. The main reason why he left Carlton is his job brief changed when he initially got there.
At Geelong, Thompson and Scott gave Wells & Luke a brief as to what type of players they required in their list management decisions. They also had a dedicated list manager who would relay this message.
At Carlton, despite McKay, Malthouse was effectively the list manager and called the shots even telling Rogers and Luke what specific draftees to recruit after they had given him their dossier. I can't say this is the reason he left but Malthouse was told or taken away from having a direct role in recruiting in Collingwood after Hine and Walsh believed the Geelong model worked best without the coach coming in.
They must have missed me. Shame.We do already have voluntary recruiters all across the country... eyes everywhere
I think Nield and Watters show being successful working under someone talented doesn't necessarily make you talented.
Will be interesting to see how he goes if he takes over from Jackson in the future.
Well lets hope Carlton keep giving Malthouse the world because having your coach as list manager is a great choice, just see Wallace aka The List Manager at Richmond, Neeld at Melbourne and Ross Lyon at Saint Kilda or even the other way round where you list manager/football manager becomes the coach like Connelly and Schwab at Melbourne.
No one. I said "if" not " when" he takes over.Why would he take over from Jackson when we have other recruiters who have been here for a long while? Who said he was coming over as a 2ic?
Rogers is out head recruiter not Malthouse.
Having a subordinate cracking the sads in decision making process that doesn't directly involve him, is pretty ordinary. Don't you think?
No one. I said "if" not " when" he takes over.
Easy to be a great assistant. The real test is when you are accountable for the decisions.
Sound like he wasn't happy with the people who will have to live with the consequences of the decisions.
I think Nield and Watters show being successful working under someone talented doesn't necessarily make you talented.
A mans got to know his limitations. Clearly Neeld wasn't up to the jobs he was employed to do by making that many mistakes before a ball had even been kicked. Watters to a lesser extent as he was always deal a crap hand that wasn't going to end well.I think both Watters and Neeld are probably tallented guys. There mistake was to take Mick's hard-ass approach and apply it as rookie coaches. Mick gets away with it as he has runs on the board and the players respect him.
Neeld rocked up to Melbourne and immidiatley marginalised senior players such as Moloney, the reigning B&F winner, by naming a couple of kids as co-captains and publically saying that while it wasn't ideal, these were the best leaders he had to work with?! From that moment on, was always going to stuggle to have the players on his side...
I was responding to a statement regarding the List manager at Carlton not the head recruiter. And the statement said he wasn't sure how much what he said with regards to Malthouse and McKay affected William's decision.
Me too.Still waiting for evidence of this appointment.
Rogers' drafting has been a bit iffy though.Rogers is out head recruiter not Malthouse.
Having a subordinate cracking the sads in decision making process that doesn't directly involve him, is pretty ordinary. Don't you think?
FWIW we don't have a list manager, we have a list management committee. So there's a hole in that statement
And I don't think Carlton supporters are concerned Williams didn't agree with our draft choices, considering both Geelong and Sydney wanted Cripps with their first pick (pick 15 & 16 vs our 13 - so not that much of a reach as others are proclaiming) and Geelong wanted Giles with their third round pick which was only a couple of picks after our 3rd round pick we used on him.
Rogers' drafting has been a bit iffy though.
On a side note this whole Extractor thing sounds more like a Big footy circle jerk than the kind of objective conversations that you would expect from a recruiting department.
I maintain that Carlton should have gotten McCarthy at 13, and whilst Cripps may be a better player, sometimes you have to put the needs of the team before your wants.
That is the reason why we took Vickery, and Why we took Conca. Yes there were more talented players on the board, but those two filled an Immediate need at the club at the time. Both are established best 22 players, and our side is substantially better with those two in them, compared to without. You only have to look at how we went when Vickery did his shoulder.
Cripps will be a very solid AFL player, but Carlton really seem to be going for a best available approach, and sometimes, that is the wrong approach to take.
Cripps will be a very solid AFL player, but Carlton really seem to be going for a best available approach, and sometimes, that is the wrong approach to take.
Sorry, I forgot you changed recruiters. Hopefully Cripps is his Oakley Nicholas then...