Remove this Banner Ad

No Oppo Supporters CAS hands down guilty verdict - Players appealing - Dank shot - no opposition - (cont in pt.2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
What's your point? She is still allowed to be accountable for her actions, you are assuming she has the confidence of a few.

Caro is not a protected specie because she has been in a role for 15 years - laughable.

What I am saying is that journalists survive on the 'strength of their sources.' Journalists die once their lose their sources. What I am saying is that Caro's story on the payment of Bomber Thompson's fine is a non-issue - It's like people making James Hird an election issue for the upcoming election - They are both utterly unimportant - And reading through Bruce Francis' thread on BB shows not to believe what you read or hear through the media.
 
For those that haven't read it yet, the Bruce Francis letter to Patrick Smith is a must.(page13)
 
For those that haven't read it yet, the Bruce Francis letter to Patrick Smith is a must.

I really feel that the constant insults diminish his work. They arent nessasary when the facts themselves carry the most weight and are more of an insult to the likes of PSmith
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I really feel that the constant insults diminish his work. They arent nessasary when the facts themselves carry the most weight and are more of an insult to the likes of PSmith


I agree somewhat, but I put myself in his position (as best I could) & if I had been ignored time & time again by these people, who lets face it have failed horribly in their reporting of this saga, then I might find that attack is the only way to get their attention & at least get some sort of response out of them. That's just my take on why he writes they way he has.

So I dont really have a problem with it, they deserve all the derision they get afaiac.
 
I agree somewhat, but I put myself in his position (as best I could) & if I had been ignored time & time again by these people, who lets face it have failed horribly in their reporting of this saga, then I might find that attack is the only way to get their attention & at least get some sort of response out of them.

Yeah true, i dont think it reflects him as a person, but it doesnt help spread his message. This information needs to be seen but people will turn their nose up if all they read is snide comments.
Just thinking from a outsiders view he just sounds likea disgruntled essendon supporter.
 
Yeah true, i dont think it reflects him as a person, but it doesnt help spread his message. This information needs to be seen but people will turn their nose up if all they read is snide comments.
Just thinking from a outsiders view he just sounds likea disgruntled essendon supporter.


A couple of posters over there have mentioned the same to him & I agree it doesn't help get the word out. As to Patrick Smith, he often put's people down the same way so in the terms of a letter from one person to another, Smith probably enjoyed it, distasteful but that's just the way he roles I suspect.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Ok to play in the NT...'suspended'? lol:oops:

Essendon supplements saga: former Bombers play in Northern Territory despite infraction notices
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...spite-infraction-notices-20141128-11vwbh.html

"Lovett-Murray's manager Peter Jess said the fact the players had been allowed to play suggested that the Australian Sports Anti-doping Authority's case was not on solid footing."

The AFL has given at least two former Essendon players permission to play competitive games in the Northern Territory Football League despite them being issued with infraction notices.

Small forward Cory Dell'Olio, and utility Nathan Lovett-Murray have been cleared to play in the territory's top competition.

Fairfax Media understands that both players are among the 34 current and former Bombers issued with infraction notices on November 14.

Dell'Olio played a game on November 15 for Waratah - which is also based in the NT capital, having received clearance from the AFL on the morning of the game.

Lovett-Murray will play for his former club St Mary's for the first time this weekend, lining up alongside former Bombers-listed player Anthony Long.

Lovett-Murray's manager Peter Jess said the fact the players had been allowed to play suggested that the Australian Sports Anti-doping Authority's case was not on solid footing.

"I'm hypothesising, but that they are allowing this to happen is an indicator of the possible penalty regime," Jess said.

Forwards Alwyn Davey and Leroy Jetta were also permitted to play games on Sunday, November 16. Fairfax Media can not confirm whether Long, Davey and Jetta were among the 34 players issued with infraction notices.

Jetta and Davey have been playing for Darwin-based club Palmerston.

The November 16 game against Wanderers was Davey's 100th for Palmerston - the club from which he was recruited to Essendon. He kicked five goals and was among his side's best in a 54-point victory.

Jetta missed that game through injury, but returned to play in last Saturday's game against Waratah.

Dell'Olio's stint was always intended to be short-lived, coinciding with Davey's milestone match. The West Australian was only made aware of his infraction notice on the morning of Waratah's clash with the Darwin Buffaloes.

Representatives for the players involved checked with the AFL as to whether they could proceed and play in the NTFL games, with the AFL deciding not to stand in the players' way.

Players issued with infraction notices will generally step away from competition as part of provisional suspensions, however the sporting bodies involved have discretion which allows them to play.

Current Bomber captain Jobe Watson and veteran defender Dustin Fletcher were both granted dispensation by the AFL to play in last Saturday's international rules match.

Both Jetta and Dell'Olio were delisted by the Bombers at the conclusion of the 2014 season, and nominated for the national draft held on Thursday night.

Davey was cut a year earlier by Essendon after playing 100 games for the club, the same season Lovett-Murray retired. Long was axed at the end of 2012 after failing to play a single game for the club.

A specially convened AFL anti-doping tribunal will hear the cases against the 34 players. December 15 had been mooted as a possible date for the hearings to begin, however they may not commence until 2015.

The AFL, AFLNT and the clubs involved declined to comment, as did the AFL Players' Association - whose legal representatives are acting on behalf of 32 of the 34 players.
 
WADA will come OTT about this.

I'm sure they will. Just like they did with the weak suspensions handed down to Cronu...... oh yeah :o
 
Horribly deceptive article.
Watch the hardcore Hird supporters jump all over him, id only ask that they read the whole thing (its not big) and note that he only holds that view IF players are suspended. Id say hes being quite reasonable.
Agreed.

Andrews is pretty much stating what many of us believe.. if players receive bans then Hird probably has to go.. and I think this is a common sense approach really.

Of course the grey area is if it is a '1 week' ban.. or they take a sweetheart deal..

The staggering part is that Andrews was even canvassed on this issue.. I mean FFS.. we are talking about the coach of a footy club.. and yet this is front page news??
 
Agreed.

Andrews is pretty much stating what many of us believe.. if players receive bans then Hird probably has to go.. and I think this is a common sense approach really.

Of course the grey area is if it is a '1 week' ban.. or they take a sweetheart deal..

The staggering part is that Andrews was even canvassed on this issue.. I mean FFS.. we are talking about the coach of a footy club.. and yet this is front page news??
He spoke on SEN and they just ask his opinion as he is an Essendon supporter and member.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...s-hird-the-cold-shoulder-20141128-11wdbu.html
AFL coaches give James Hird the cold shoulder
Date
N
1408400777609.png

ovember 28, 2014 - 6:30PM
Caroline Wilson
Chief Football Writer for The Age
View more articles from Caroline Wilson
Email Caroline
1417161498369.jpg

Mark Brayshaw has defended his push to broker talks between James Hird and his coaching compatriots,Photo: Pat Scala

A significant number of senior AFL coaches have continued to avoid meaningful talks with Essendon coach James Hird, resisting the encouragement to do so from new coaches' association boss Mark Brayshaw.

With Hird attending his first official AFL function on the eve of the national draft on the Gold Coast this week, Brayshaw defended his push to broker talks between Hird and his coaching compatriots, saying it was the role of his organisation to encourage communication between all league coaches.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...s-hird-the-cold-shoulder-20141128-11wdbu.html
 

I'm confused as to who is actually expected to give a **** about this? Does it change anything? Does anything need to change? Has anyone, anywhere, ever indicated that they may be required to give any ****s whether Hird has a friendly chat with his competitors or not? I'm fairly certain that if I smeared my duck butter across the screen of my IPad it would provide as much meaning, insight and factual information regarding Hird as this article Caro has just shat out beneath an Age letterhead.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom