And like that it's back to Hartlett staying long term. Bloody hell that's been the obvious one the whole time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

HAMISH Hartlett is expected to commit his long-term future to Port Adelaide despite keen interest from rival clubs.
With the Power managing a tight salary cap, there was suggestions the club was vulnerable to losing Hartlett as it looks to accommodate Gold Coast forward Charlie Dixon.
However, Fox Footy understands the 25-year-old is weighing up a new deal that would effectively make him a one-club player.
The lucrative offer is likely to be back ended to help Port Adelaide through its cap squeeze.
Hartlett’s current two-year contract does not expire until 2016, coinciding with his restricted free agency eligibility.
Cross-town rivals Adelaide, in addition to Victorian clubs Melbourne, North Melbourne and Richmond, have been linked to Hartlett. However, the Demons are not considered a likely destination.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad

However, the Demons are not considered a likely destination.
#destinationclubnot

However, the Demons are not considered a _______________________However, the Demons are not considered a likely destination.
#destinationclubnot
Surprised you didn't go with Conca.I'll admit I was struggling.![]()


Jay Schulz is also Port Adelaide.Hamish Hartlett is Port Adelaide.
We're did you here that ??david king basically backed up what all of us have been saying here.
he says
-he has spoken to people at port, who found the reports quite bizarre
-hamish close and very keen to recommitting to the club
-no salary cap squeeze (why resign schulz to lose hartlett?)
-hamish hartlett is not a player you let go.
i believe him because i believe the club has its friends in the media who they will give inside info to because they have no agenda (king, Afl 360) or are football people who dont try to big note themselves by spreading rumours like barrett or scoops.
We're did you here that ??
david king basically backed up what all of us have been saying here.
he says
-he has spoken to people at port, who found the reports quite bizarre
-hamish close and very keen to recommitting to the club
-no salary cap squeeze (why resign schulz to lose hartlett?)
-hamish hartlett is not a player you let go.
Thanks mate. Do you have the link to that interview
who are the 5 trade table players?Lets say Rooch is right for oncewho are the 5 trade table players?
Young, Moore, O'Shea, Butcher (stay calm), The Carhoon ?
*Mitchell, I doubt would garner any interest
Lets say Rooch is right for oncewho are the 5 trade table players?
Young, Moore, O'Shea, Butcher (stay calm), The Carhoon ?
*Mitchell, I doubt would garner any interest
