SydneyMalakellis
Senior List
Imagine if Bigfooty existed when Gary Ayres was around. This thread would be 868585577788556775457887608796099 pages long by now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Here's a thought - what if they were wrong?
Yep, I thought we played average football all year and really, its no 'accident' that Scott managed to get us so high on the ladder, given how ordinary we were. But happy to disagree on this one.No, because you don't get there by accident. We were good enough to win the games we did. They certainly weren't ordinary, but the finals results showed that in September they were nowhere near Hawthorn, and unable to get past North.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It still reflects nothing against Scott. You're holding him responsible for the performance of an independent department whose job is to maintain the health of the players and provide accurate recommendations to those without medical expertise.
To hold Scott accountable for the performance of the medical department would be an excellent example of bad governance.
The only case in which he could be accountable is if he disregarded their advice.
It certainly would be. Which is why it isn't what I said. I said someone should held accountable, and if it was the medical staff's call then that's who it is.
Who was referring to 2013, go and read Cronin's reply again, you seem to jump blindly into everything.
I don't agree with Fremantle's midfield being that much better than ours, I believe we lost that game because they were better prepared, they're pressure and intensity was far greater and their structures worked better.
What did I see? I saw Steve Johnson get a mountain of the ball in the first quarter, then got the Crowley tag and barely got a sniff after that; why wasn't he moved forward to not only try and break the tag but also kick some goals, which we were only able to kick 9 of?
We had no movement up forward, which allowed for Ross Lyon put players down back and then slingshot forward, where we got caught out every time.
All I can go by is what I see and the results we get.
Does this sound like 2013?Can you get something right ?his whole bloody post almost is about the 2013 QF final.
And what did the medical experts say about agravating it even more if he played?
Listen this is not complex .
He did not aggravate it by playing .
I don't agree with you and I'm tired of arguing the same points over and over again.Don't start this nonsense about Scott not making any changes during the game , its a fairy tale .Coaches make more than 20 positional changes a quarter .As for structural changes , the way the game is played today with 18 players around the ground us supporters don't notice most structural changes, they are too subtle .I am sure Johnson would of been played up forward .
Sorry they have 4 Big bodies A grade midfielders that are well backed up , we have just 1 joel selwood .
Notice how the media have never criticised Scott like they criticised Thompson for finals loses ?
Even cook came out and said Scott had proven himself to be a really good coach early in 2014 ?
Does this sound like 2013?
.
Settle down mate, I wasn't generalising about Chris Scott's overall ability as a coach, I clearly stated that IMO he was out-coached by Ross Lyon in the 2013 Qualifying Final.
You argued that Fremantle had a superior midfield to us, yet in that game we still had premiership midfielders in Corey, Bartel, Kelly, Johnson, Selwood, Chapman, Stokes, Duncan as well as young players in Motlop, Caddy and Guthrie; Still pretty capable I think.
We were standing right behind the goals and trust me we saw everything that was happening or wasn't happening.
BTW Paul Chapman had 11 possessions and 5 tackles in a little over a quarter and the week after he was B.O.G against Port Adelaide so imagine if he had of played a full game....
.
No hope? he always has to have the last say, even if wrong.I don't agree with you and I'm tired of arguing the same points over and over again.
At the end of the day we all want the club to be successful so let's just leave it at that.
By playing it got so sore that he just couldn't play anymore.
No hope? he always has to have the last say, even if wrong.
Whatever you say Dr Crazy.That's were your wrong , your assuming it was playing football that made his back sore .
People who have a bulging disc usually have good and bad day , that goes for AFL footballers and the rest of us .It was just unfortunate that his bad day was on the day of the QF.
That's were your wrong , your assuming it was playing football that made his back sore .
People who have a bulging disc usually have good and bad day , that goes for AFL footballers and the rest of us .It was just unfortunate that his bad day was on the day of the QF.
They could well have been. But at the time, do you go against the experts or do you trust their expertise? That is my point. If I recall, the docs were saying that rest wouldn't help and playing wouldn't make it any worse than it already was. So what would you do given that information?Here's a thought - what if they were wrong?
Forbidden? Haven't seen anything of the sort. Are you sure you aren't over-embellishing for dramatic effect?I'm sorry, I've been told before that unless one has a medical background speculating on injuries is forbidden. If you haven't got the letters 'MD' after your name you'll be informed of that.
Forbidden? Haven't seen anything of the sort. Are you sure you aren't over-embellishing for dramatic effect?
Whatever you say Dr Crazy.
I think you may be right....Vdubs doesn't have MD after his name but comments frequently on injuries..but hey, why ruin a good story.
Just from my father's experience, in this case I think geelong_crazy26 is pretty spot on.
They could well have been. But at the time, do you go against the experts or do you trust their expertise? That is my point. If I recall, the docs were saying that rest wouldn't help and playing wouldn't make it any worse than it already was. So what would you do given that information?
Whatever you say Dr Crazy.
I'm sorry, I've been told before that unless one has a medical background speculating on injuries is forbidden. If you haven't got the letters 'MD' after your name you'll be informed of that.
Forbidden? Haven't seen anything of the sort. Are you sure you aren't over-embellishing for dramatic effect?