Donakebab
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Posts
- 36,083
- Reaction score
- 50,471
- Location
- Tempy Pub
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Detroit Red Wings
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

But surely he's worth a lower pick than that?

He's 11 spots better than Sam Mitchell.But surely he's worth a lower pick than that?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54...What numbers are available?
we don't have 48 players48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54...
I was going to tag you but had a feeling I wouldn't have to.1, 14, 16, 17, 19, (31), 38, 42
Eades also has 35, so if he isn't rookied that will be vacant as well.

Is that sad? I think that's a bit sad...I was going to tag you but had a feeling I wouldn't have to.![]()
I don't think it's sad at all.Is that sad? I think that's a bit sad...
Sadder still is I didn't need to look it up.
1, 14, 16, 17, 19, (31), 38, 42
Eades also has 35, so if he isn't rookied that will be vacant as well.
Cooney Melksham and maybe Paul Thomas?Last 3 players to wear 17?
Cooney Melksham and maybe Paul Thomas?
Add 15, 37 and 41... wow. The knives are sharp this year...I don't think it's sad at all.
we don't have 48 players
Last 3 players to wear 17?
Cooney Melksham and maybe Paul Thomas?
I had last 2 but 3rd has me stumped
We have more than 16 playersWe should give him 16.
And number 16 is vacant.We have more than 16 players
Give him number 1 just in case, so we don't have to use 42 again if there are too many players.And number 16 is vacant.