Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good point you raise. I don't claim be an expert on economic policy but I definitely feel we could be kinder. Maybe sometimes these politicians are focused on the party room rather than God.Economic policy too. Not many of the meek are getting an inheritance from this government, they seem far more concerned about the money lenders.
Because we are not reflecting Christ. I always aim to be a reflection of Christ but I'm a sinner and I fall short.
Perhaps they've forsaken God for Mammon, and only tote their bibles when it comes to telling a woman what she can, and can't do with her body, or stopping gay people being wed.Good point you raise. I don't claim be an expert on economic policy but I definitely feel we could be kinder. Maybe sometimes these politicians are focused on the party room rather than God.
Who is they?Perhaps they've forsaken God for Mammon, and only tote their bibles when it comes to telling a woman what she can, and can't do with her body, or stopping gay people being wed.
Like Turnbull and Shorten who both attend church and are in support of marriage equality?So called Christian MPs.
I was sincerely hoping you were an educated Christian, bringing in theological debate, quoting scripture and the like. Religion is one of the most studied topics in the history of mankind and as you are appointing yourself a representative of whatever branch of Christianity you adhere to I was hoping you would have a deep understanding. I mean, I appreciate your effort, but you are opening yourself to ridicule. simply saying we aren't like Christ, and 'because of God' as you did earlier is slightly insulting to the men and women who spent decades of their lives studying what their religion means to them.
May I ask what denomination you belong to? Or are you more of an ecumenical Christian?
I'm thinking more of the conservative rump in the Liberal Party, for a bunch of self identifying Christians, there's a massive disconnect between their policy positions, and biblical teaching.Like Turnbull and Shorten who both attend church and are in support of marriage equality?
Great point. That is why I voted Australian Christians (not to be confused with Christian democrats) because whether are mot you agree with Christian views at least they are consistent.Perhaps they've forsaken God for Mammon, and only tote their bibles when it comes to telling a woman what she can, and can't do with her body, or stopping gay people being wed.
If you read the opening post I said that this thread is not about theological debate. Nor do I claim to be representative or a spokesman for any particular denomination. As mentioned I attend a Presbyterian Church but just consider myself a Christian.I was sincerely hoping you were an educated Christian, bringing in theological debate, quoting scripture and the like. Religion is one of the most studied topics in the history of mankind and as you are appointing yourself a representative of whatever branch of Christianity you adhere to I was hoping you would have a deep understanding. I mean, I appreciate your effort, but you are opening yourself to ridicule. simply saying we aren't like Christ, and 'because of God' as you did earlier is slightly insulting to the men and women who spent decades of their lives studying what their religion means to them.
May I ask what denomination you belong to? Or are you more of an ecumenical Christian?
So you have fallen for the same trap that daesh sets for Muslims, represent the hardline ultra conservative interpretation of the faith is if it is the only one to tar everyone with the same brush. By all means mock the conservative rump of the liberal party but don't simply say all Christian mp's are that way inclined. I know a Catholic MP who personally very conservative in their own behaviours (non drinking smoking swearing or gambling, prudish beyond all belief really) but says that while his faith represents his personal choices, as a representative he has to follow the will of the people and most importantly respect that people have a freedom of will and should never have religion pushed upon them just like he wouldn't like it pushed upon him...so he supports marriage equality, abortion rights and so on.I'm thinking more of the conservative rump in the Liberal Party, for a bunch of self identifying Christians, there's a massive disconnect between their policy positions, and biblical teaching.
I don't think I said all Christian MP's are that way inclined. I am conservative in some areas but def not all, see my posts on refugees.So you have fallen for the same trap that daesh sets for Muslims, represent the hardline ultra conservative interpretation of the faith is if it is the only one to tar everyone with the same brush. By all means mock the conservative rump of the liberal party but don't simply say all Christian mp's are that way inclined. I know a Catholic MP who personally very conservative in their own behaviours (non drinking smoking swearing or gambling, prudish beyond all belief really) but says that while his faith represents his personal choices, as a representative he has to follow the will of the people and most importantly respect that people have a freedom of will and should never have religion pushed upon them just like he wouldn't like it pushed upon him...so he supports marriage equality, abortion rights and so on.
I can remember being in a meeting room where religion teachers were discussions the curriculum they will teach for the year in a catholic school and the key understanding everyone took from the meeting was never to teach the bible literally, never to foster fundamentalism and to treat the book and its traditions as something to be interpreted in a way that brings out personal morals and messages, and that notions of love, charity and respect should be heavily emphasised. When the question was asked of marriage equality it was a difficult one, everyone in the room supported it but knew the official church stance was against it...thus it was decided to first teach love and importantly the idea of the golden rule first...then explain the official potition only if it is asked (so the one or two hardline families amongst the thousand who send their kids to the school know the official position is taught)... but however back that up with the gift of free will each person is given and how love is crucial to everything we hold dear and should be encouraged. It wasn't satisfactory to any of them admittedly...and I spoke to a few after who said they would state their personal position in class anyway as a way of comforting their students despite what repercussions it may entail.
From personal experiences, the vast majority in the Catholic faith under the age of 50 are probably who some would call leaning to the left politically simply because of the idea that "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" is their guiding principle. Sure they live conservatively personally but who are they to say what others should be doing if they are not causing anyone else harm?
But if you want to get stuck into the Australian Christian Lobby and the DLP then be my guest.
Totally agree. I definitely think they should be.Gough's line of questioning has nailed what I was trying to get at earlier. The disconnect between self professed Christians and their actions. Why aren't they called out when they kick the disadvantaged in the guts. It's like hearing a Hawthorn supporter say "Cyril doesn't chase hard enough".
Because we are not reflecting Christ. I always aim to be a reflection of Christ but I'm a sinner and I fall short.
There are many different faiths around the world and different faiths beliefs different things, some believe there are multiple Gods. Speaking for Christanity It all changed because of the reformation 500 years ago which occurred because Martin Luthor believed the Catholic church had move away from the Bible.
On wars when Christians are involved in starting conflict they are not obeying Christ they are actually disobeying him
I don't think Christians feel the need to control others, I certainly don't. I do however defend my right in a democratic society to have an opinion and I believe Christians are just as entitled as anyone else to express an opinion.
Yes I do have an insight into his teaching through the Bible and yes I live my life for him and my identity is in Christ absolutely.
How did this identity of yours come about?
Was it passed down to you, in which case it wouldn't really be your identity. You'd be simply following others' followings, or....
Did you find religion off your own accord and if so, what 'science' did you use to come to the conclusion for your god?
Using words belief, faith, trust don't count.
A bit like all the other words in your post.
Your entitled to your opinion. Obviously I disagree but have a great Christmas.
But lets remember that if Christanity is true so is heaven and we are only on earth for a temporary assignment and heaven is our home.
God being what?To answer your question. Simple its because of God.
Do you love terrorists and isis?We don't. We love the Gay community and we love everyone.